Editorial: How to increase probability of manuscript acceptance

Vol.8,No.2(2014)

Abstract

Editorial: How to increase probability of manuscript acceptance

Author biographies

David Smahel

Faculty of Social Studies, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic

David Smahel, Ph.D. is the Associate Professor at the Institute of Children, Youth and Family Research, Masaryk University, the Czech Republic. He directs the workgroup “Cyberpsychology” (http://www.cyberpsychology.eu/team) which researches social- psychological implications of the internet and technology. Current research focuses on adolescents’ and adults’ internet use, the online risks of children and adolescents, the construction of online identities and virtual relationships, and online addictive behavior. He is editor of Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace and has co-authored book Digital Youth: The Role of Media in Development (Springer, 2011). Smahel also published in several international journals such as Developmental Psychology, Cyberpsychology & Behavior, Zeitschrift für Psychologie, European Journal of Developmental Psychology and others. He is also author of several book chapters, such as in Encyclopedia of Cyber Behavior, Encyclopedia of Adolescence, Internet Addiction: A Handbook and Guide to Evaluation and Treatment, Gesundheit und Neue Medien etc.

Kristian Daneback

Department of Social Work, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

Kristian Daneback, Ph.D. is the Professor of Social Work at the University of Gothenburg, Sweden and in the Faculty of Social Studies at Masaryk University in Brno, Czech Republic. His main field of research is sexuality and in particular internet sexuality, but he is also interested in other internet related phenomena such as parenthood and the internet, cyberbullying, and how the internet can be used to collect qualitative and quantitative data. Daneback has published his research in several well known international journals such as Archives of Sexual Behavior, Cyberpsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking, Journal of Sexual and Relationship Therapy, Journal of Bisexuality, and Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity. In addition, he is a reviewer for journals such as Journal of Sex Research, Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, Pediatrics, Sex Roles, and Sexual Reproduction & Health Care. Currently he serves as the Associated Editor of Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace and is a Board Member of the Open Journal of Communication and ISRN Family Medicine. Daneback is also a member of the International Academy of Sex Research and the Association of Internet Researchers.

Lenka Dedkova

Faculty of Social Studies, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic

Lenka Dedkova is a PhD student of social psychology at the Faculty of Social Studies, Masaryk University, Brno, where she also works for the Institute for Research of Children, Youth and Family. Her research interests include cyberbullying and meeting online strangers, with focus on children and adolescents, but she’s also interested in online security behavior and social networking sites.

Full text

Dear researchers, colleagues, and readers interested in research on cyberspace,

We are pleased to present the July issue (2-2014) of “Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace”. In this issue, we present six articles which originate from three continents (Europe, Asia, Australia) and use different methodologies: surveys, in-depths interviews, focus groups and also content analyses. As discussed below, also the topics of this issue are diverse, and such territorial, methodological and topical variability allows readers to understand Cyberspace from different cultural and scientific perspectives.

The first article ”Media representations and children’s discourses on online risks: Findings from qualitative research in nine European countries” (Mascheroni, Jorge, Farrugia) is based on unique qualitative data from nine European countries and tries to understand how and to what extent children’s perceptions of online risks incorporate media representations, parental worries and discourses circulating among peers. Authors also investigate differences among ages, genders and identify cross-culture variations. The second article “Family honor, cultural norms and social networking: Strategic choices in the visual self- presentation of young Indian Muslim women” (Mishra, Basu) is also based on qualitative investigation and explores how young Indian Muslim women negotiate multiple influences while posting their photographs on social networking sites. Authors concluded that most Indian Muslim women seemed to carry the responsibility of upholding the “honor” of their families, a requirement in their offline life, also to digital settings. The third article “Is it Friday yet? Mothers talking about sex online” (Pedersen) explores the discussion of sex on the UK parenting website Mumsnet. The authors summarizes that women seek the advice and support from others, attempt to establish ‘norms’ relating to sexual behaviour, and supplement information given by health professionals. The fourth article “A developmental perspective regarding the behaviour of adolescents, young adults, and adults on social network sites” (Steijn) uses the developmental perspective to understand the behaviour of individuals on social network sites with respect to information sharing and the type of contacts. The fifth article “The role of social motivation and sociability of gamers in online game addiction” (Blinka, Mikuška) researches MMO gamers and focuses on associations between social factors and online addictive gaming. Authors revealed that although social motivation is a predictor of addictive gaming, high social motivation was typical for intensive gamers regardless of their level of addiction. The sixth article “Cyberbullying and self-esteem in Australian adults” (Brack, Caltabiano) examines the prevalence of cyberbully typologies and their associations with self- esteem in a sample of young adults. Authors summarize that research should examine cyberbullying behaviour across all age groups to determine if this is related to different factors in adolescence compared to adulthood.

Researchers submitting articles may be interested in the journal’s acceptance rate statistics and also how long it takes to receive a decision after reviews. Therefore, we calculated our data for 2013:

  • The acceptance rate was 5% (decreased from 20% in 2012). Although we receive more and more articles every year, we still encourage the submission of more high-quality articles!
  • The decision with two reviews typically takes 3 – 5 months (average 4 months).
  • Half of the articles were rejected directly by editors and the average time for editorial rejects is two

The high editorial rejection rate means that half of the manuscripts were not of sufficient quality to go into the review process. We would like to decrease this number, and so we decided to list the typical reasons of editorial rejects below along with our recommendations for authors for lowering the chance of editorial rejection:

  • The manuscript does not fit into our journal’s scope. Check the Submission page carefully to see what articles we publish, and also browse through a few issues to obtain a better picture.
  • The manuscript does not follow APA style guidelines. Check the newest Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Please follow the structure of articles recommended by APA.
  • The manuscript is not a scientific article. We do not publish essays and if the authors are submitting a theoretical review, they should again follow the APA style. It is a frequent mistake that the authors simply write “what they think” and the manuscript lacks scientific argumentation for their perspectives. The authors’ ideas can be great and even ground breaking, but we are a scientific journal and publish only scientific articles based on the APA style.
  • The manuscript does not bring a substantial contribution to the current state of knowledge, but instead only reproduces already known results and/or relations. Read more relevant articles in your area of research. Your literature review must be strong.
  • The manuscript does not provide sufficient information for proper evaluation: typically missing information about measures and their psychometric properties, or missing information about statistical analysis, or about the sample. Check statistical books to see what has to be reported and again follow the APA manual and recommendations.
  • The sample used in the study is not an appropriate sample for planned analyses and does not allow the drawing of the authors’ conclusions made in the manuscript. Typically, the sample is too small, too narrow, or self-selected and not appropriate for relevant conclusions. Check carefully that your data allow you to analyze what you want the way you want to do Otherwise collect more data or change the analysis plan.
  • The manuscript has not been proofread. The language of your manuscript is important and must be 100% correct.
  • The manuscript does not provide sufficient rationale for the Explicitly justify and explain why your research is needed and who (and how) benefits from the results.

We believe that if authors avoid all the mistakes mentioned above, they have a good chance to get through the whole review process. Therefore we want to encourage researchers to continue to submit their work to our journal – your manuscripts are most welcome!

We will be also happy to meet you personally at the 12th Conference on “Cyberspace” in Brno dated 28- 29 November (see http://cyberspace.muni.cz). We will be honored to discuss your possible manuscripts, but also various fascinating aspects of Cyberspace research!

All the best,

David Smahel, editor

Kristian Daneback, associate editor Lenka Dedkova, editor assistant

Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace

Issue Content

Editorial and issue information

David Smahel, Kristian Daneback and Lenka Dedkova

doi: 10.5817/CP2014-2-1

 

Media representations and children’s discourses on online risks: Findings from qualitative research in nine European countries

Giovanna Mascheroni, Ana Jorge and Lorleen Farrugia

doi: 10.5817/CP2014-2-2

 

Family honor, cultural norms and social networking: Strategic choices in the visual self-presentation of young Indian Muslim women

Smeeta Mishra and Surhita Basu

doi: 10.5817/CP2014-2-3

 

Is it Friday yet? Mothers talking about sex online

Sarah Pedersen

doi: 10.5817/CP2014-2-4

 

A developmental perspective regarding the behaviour of adolescents, young adults, and adults on social network sites

Wouter Martinus Petrus Steijn

doi: 10.5817/CP2014-2-5

 

The role of social motivation and sociability of gamers in online game addiction

Lukas Blinka and Jakub Mikuška

doi: 10.5817/CP2014-2-6

 

Cyberbullying and self-esteem in Australian adults

Kerryn Brack and Nerina Caltabiano

doi: 10.5817/CP2014-2-7

 

About Journal

The 'Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace' is a web-based, peer-reviewed scholarly journal. The first peer-reviewed issue was published in September 2007. The journal is focussed on social science research about cyberspace. It brings psychosocial reflections of the impact of the Internet on people and society. The journal is interdisciplinary, publishing works written by scholars of psychology, media studies, sociology, political science, nursing, and also other disciplines. The journal accepts original research articles, as well as theoretical studies and research meta-analyses. Proposals for special issues are also welcomed.

The journal is indexed with EBSCO Academic Search Complete, the Directory of Open Access Journals, SCOPUS and the Czech Database of Scientific Journals.

The articles in Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace are open access articles licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.

Editor

Assoc. Prof. David Smahel, M.Sc. et Ph.D., Faculty of Social Studies, Masaryk University, Czech Republic
E-mail: smahel(at)fss.muni.cz

Associate Editor

Prof. Kristian Daneback, Ph.D., University of Gothenburg, Sweden
E-mail: kristian.daneback(at)socwork.gu.se

Editor Assistant

Lenka Dedkova, M.A., Faculty of Social Studies, Masaryk University, Czech Republic
E-mail: ldedkova(at)fss.muni.cz

Editorial Board

Prof. Kaveri Subrahmanyam, Ph.D., California State University, Los Angeles, USA

Prof. Herbert Hrachovec, Ph.D., University of Vienna, Austria

Prof. Dr. Micheline Frenette, Universite de Montreal, Canada

Prof. Alexander E. Voiskounsky, Ph.D., Moscow State University, Russia

Prof. Michael W. Ross, Ph.D., DrMedSc, MPH, MPHEd, University of Texas, Houston, USA

Prof. Petr Macek, CSc., Masaryk University, Czech Republic

Prof. Olle Findahl, World Internet Institute, Uppsala University, Sweden

Prof. Jochen Peter, Ph.D., University of Amsterdam, Netherlands

Prof. Veronika Kalmus, Ph.D., University of Tartu, Estonia

Assoc. Prof. Joshua Fogel, Ph.D., Brooklyn College of the City University of New York, USA

Assoc. Prof. Gustavo S. Mesch, Ph.D., University of Haifa, Israel

Václav Štětka, Ph.D., University of Oxford, UK

Andra Siibak, Ph.D., University of Tartu, Estonia

Birgit U. Stetina, Ph.D., University of Vienna, Austria

Lukas Blinka, Ph.D., Faculty of Social Studies, Masaryk University, Czech Republic

Advisory Board

Prof. Bente Traen, Ph.D., University of Tromso, Norway

Prof. Charles Ess, Ph.D., Drury University, USA

Prof. Dr. Ilse Kryspin-Exner, University of Vienna, Austria

Prof. PhDr. Jan Jirák, Ph.D., Charles University, Czech Republic

Prof. Vasja Vehovar, Ph.D., University of Ljubljana, Slovenia

Prof. Dr. Larry D. Rosen, California State University, USA

Prof. Patricia M. Greenfield, Ph.D., University of California, USA

Prof. Peter K Smith, University of London, England

Prof. Nicola Döring, Ilmenau University of Technology, Germany

Prof. Kimberly Young, Center for Internet Addiction Recovery Prof. Jos de Haan, Ph.D., Erasmus University, Netherlands

Prof. Zbyněk Vybíral, Faculty of Social Studies, Masaryk University, Czech Republic

Prof. Monica Whitty, Ph.D., Nottingham Trent University, UK

Assoc. Prof. Alfred Choi, Ph.D., Wee Kim School of Communication and Information, Singapore

Assoc. Prof. T. Ramayah, Technology Management Lab, School of Management, Universiti Sains Malaysia

Assoc. Prof. Neil Coulson, Ph.D., The University of Nottingham, UK

Assoc. Prof. Kenneth C. C. Yang, Ph.D., University of Texas at El Paso, USA

Assoc. Prof. Sun Sun Lim, Ph.D., National University of Singapore, Singapore

Assoc. Prof. Sameer Hinduja, Ph.D., Florida Atlantic University, USA

Assoc. Prof. Jana Horáková, Ph.D., Faculty of Arts, Masaryk University, Czech Republic

Assoc. Prof. Radim Polčák, Ph.D., Faculty of Law, Masaryk University, Czech Republic

Assist. Prof. Alexander Schouten, Ph.D., Tilburg University, Netherlands

Assist. Prof. Ewa S. Callahan, Ph.D., School of Communications, Quinnipiac University, USA

Assist. Prof. Regina van den Eijnden, Ph.D., Utrecht University, Netherlands

PhDr. Ing. Petr Soukup, Ph.D., Faculty of Social Studies, Charles University, Czech Republic

Alistair Duff, Ph.D., Napier University, Scotland

Janis Wolak, Ph.D., University of New Hampshire, USA

Francesca Romana Seganti, Ph.D., American University of Rome, Italy

Jeffrey Gavin, Ph.D., University of Bath, UK

Pille Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt, Ph.D., University of Tartu, Estonia

Michael Fenichel, Ph.D., New York, USA

Leslie Haddon, Ph.D., London School of Economics, UK

Monica Barbovschi, Ph.D., Masaryk University, Czech Republic

Jan Sirucek, Ph.D., Faculty of Social Studies, Masaryk University, Czech Republic

Publisher

Masaryk University, Faculty of Social Studies Jostova 10, 60200 Brno

Czech Republic

Publication Schedule

Twice per year (July and December) plus special issue

Metrics

4780

Views

3089

HTML views