The tacit dimension of parental mediation
Special issue: Young Children’s Use of Digital Media and Parental Mediation
Studies into the way parents mediate their children’s (digital) media use are challenging. A reason for this is that parents are not always aware of what they do and why, as their choices do not necessarily involve rational decision-making. In the present study we adopted the notion of “tacit knowledge” (Nonaka & Takeuchi, 1995; Polanyi, 1966) to explore how and why parents of young children mediate digital media use. In-depth interviews were conducted with 24 Dutch parents from 15 families who were selected to represent a range of socioeconomic backgrounds and different family compositions. Through qualitative analysis we first distinguished three mediation styles of “regulation”, “guidance” and “space”. Furthermore, we revealed seven values that drive parental mediation: three core values of “balance”, “freedom” and “protection” that are foundational in the sense that they explain why parents mediate; three orientational values of “qualification”, “Bildung” and “health/fitness” that explain to which end parents mediate; and one additional value of “flexibility” that accounts for parents’ exception-making. Finally, we showed that the most important emotions associated with these values were anger and disapproval (with balance and protection) and love and joy (with orientational values); fear was mentioned occasionally (in relation to protection).
Parental mediation; young children; digital media; emotions; values; tacit knowledge; qualitative research
Akkerman, S., Admiraal, W., Brekelmans, M., & Oos, H. (2006). Auditing quality of research in social sciences. Quality & Quantity, 42, 257-274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9044-4
Boeije, H. (2010). Analysis in qualitative research. Los Angeles: Sage.
Bucx, F. (Ed.). (2011). Gezinsrapport 2011: Een portret van het gezinsleven in Nederland [Family report 2011: A portrait of family life in the Netherlands]. The Hague: The Netherlands Institute for Social Research.
Chaudron, S. (2015). Young children (0–8) and digital technology. A qualitative exploratory
study across seven countries. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC93239
Clark, L.S. (2011). Parental mediation theory for the digital age. Communication Theory, 21, 323-343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2011.01391.x
Danner, H. (1994). ‘Bildung’: A basic term of German education. Retrieved from http://www.helmut-danner.info/pdfs/German_term_Bildung.pdf
Eastin, M., Greenberg, B. S., & Hofschire, L. (2006). Parenting the Internet. Journal of Communication, 56, 486–504. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00297.x
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
Hochschild, A. R. (1979). Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 85, 551–575. https://doi.org/10.1086/227049
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge Universiy Press.
Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E.J. (2008). Parental mediation of children's Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52, 581-599. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150802437396
Mascheroni, G. (2014). Parenting the mobile internet in Italian households: Parents' and children's discourses. Journal of Children and Media, 8, 440-456. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2013.830978
Nikken, P., & Jansz, J. (2013). Developing scales to measure parental mediation of young children's internet use. Learning, Media and Technology, 39, 250-266. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.782038
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nussbaum, M. (2004). Emotions as judgements of value and importance. In R. C. Solomon (Ed.), Thinking about feeling (pp. 183-213). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Paavola, S., Lipponen, L., & Hakkarainen, K. (2004). Models of innovative knowledge communities and three metaphors of learning. Review of Educational Research, 74, 557-576. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074004557
Padilla-Walker, L. M., Coyne, S. M., Fraser, A. M., Dyer, W. J., & Yorgason, J. B. (2012). Parents and adolescents growing up in the digital age: Latent growth curve analysis of proactive media monitoring. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 1153–1165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.03.005
Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Shaver, P., Schwartz, J., Kirson, D., & O'Connor, C. (2001). Emotion knowledge: Further exploration of a prototype approach. In W.G. Parrott (Ed.), Emotions in social psychology: Essential readings (pp. 26-56). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
Solomon, R. C. (2004). Emotions, thoughts, and feelings: Emotions as engagements with the world. In R. C. Solomon (Ed.), Thinking about feeling (pp. 76-88). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
van der Voort, T. H. A., Nikken, P., & van Lil, J. E. (1992). Determinants of parental guidance
of children’s television viewing: A Dutch replication study. Journal of Broadcasting &Electronic Media, 36, 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838159209364154
Valkenburg, P. M., Krcmar, M., Peeters, A. L., & Marseille, N. M. (1999). Developing a scale to assess three styles of television mediation: “Instructive mediation,” “restrictive mediation” and “social coviewing.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 43, 52–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838159909364474
Zaman, B., Nouwen, M., Vanattenhoven, J., De Ferrerre, E., & Van Looy, J. (2016). A qualitative inquiry into the contextualized parental mediation practices of young children’s digital media use at Home. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 60, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2015.1127240
1. Learning and Collaboration Technologies. Designing the Learner and Teacher Experience
Eva Brooks, Marie Bengtsson
ISBN 978-3-031-05657-4 Chapter 13, first page: 176, year: 2022
2. Subterfuge: a parental strategy for mediating young children’s digital media practices in Azerbaijan
Learning, Media and Technology first page: 1, year: 2023
3. Relationship between restrictive strategies of parental control and digital violence in adolescence
Milica Matović, Vesna Zunić-Pavlović
CM: Communication and Media vol: 15, issue: 47, first page: 35, year: 2020
4. When you think you know: The effectiveness of restrictive mediation on parental awareness of cyberbullying experiences among children and adolescents
Oksana Caivano, Karissa Leduc, Victoria Talwar
Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace vol: 14, issue: 1, year: 2020
5. Editorial: Young children’s use of digital media and parental mediation
Bieke Zaman, Charles L. Mifsud
Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace vol: 11, issue: 3, year: 2017
6. Factors Affecting Parental Mediation Strategies in Children’s Technology Use: A Systematic Review
Rabia ÜSTÜNDAĞ ALKAN, Alper ASLAN, Yiğit Emrah TURGUT, Engin KURŞUN
Journal of Computer and Education Research vol: 9, issue: 18, first page: 702, year: 2021
7. The shared reading of digital storybooks with young children: Parents’ perspectives
Maria Nicholas, Louise Paatsch
Research Papers in Education first page: 1, year: 2023
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright © 2017 Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace