Let’s talk about sex: How people with intellectual disability in Australia engage with online social media and intimate relationships

Judith Darragh, Louise Reynolds, Caroline Ellison, Michelle Bellon

Abstract

People with intellectual disability often experience repression and control of their sexuality as they have historically been perceived as being childlike and asexual by members of society.  Such acts can be seen to contravene their Human Rights under The Convention on the Rights of Person with Disabilities (CRPD), which endorses the rights of people with intellectual disability to fully express their sexuality.
The purpose of this study was to explore if people with intellectual disability access internet based social media, and if so, if they use it to form relationships that express their sexuality.
Using an interpretative phenomenological approach, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 30 adults with an intellectual disability (22 males, 8 females), aged between 20 to 66 years. Participants were purposely sampled though disability #organisations.
Three themes emerged from the data: creating new friendships, maintaining existing friendships, exploring and expressing sexuality.  People with intellectual disability used a variety of personal electronic devices to access internet based social media to be socially and sexually active. Facebook was accessed to make contact with existing platonic friends, peers and interest groups to meet socially. Sexually explicit material was viewed using the internet, either as an individual activity or by couples in monogamous relationships. 
This study adds to the paucity of research examining the use of internet based social media by people with intellectual disability for sexual expression. This research revealed the people with intellectual disability exercised cyber safe practices without any explicit formal education and conducted themselves in a respectful manner.  Few participants acted in a manner that appeared to put them at risk of exploitation.

Bibliographic citation

Darragh, J., Reynolds, L., Ellison, C., & Bellon, M. (2017). Let’s talk about sex: How people with intellectual disability in Australia engage with online social media and intimate relationships. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 11(1), article 9. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/CP2017-1-9

Keywords

intellectual disability; internet based social media; relationships; sexuality; Gatekeeper

Full Text:

HTML

References

Show references Hide references

Amado, A. N., Stancliffe, R. J., McCarron, M., & McCallion, P. (2013). Social inclusion and community participation of individuals with intellectual/ development disabilities. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 51, 360-375. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-51.5.360

Batey, G., & Waine, H. (2015). Safe internet access for service users. Art & Science, 18(3), 16-20.

Bazzo, G., Nota, L., Soresi, S., Ferrari, L., & Minnes, P. (2007). Attitudes of social service providers towards the sexuality of individuals with intellectual disability. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 20, 110-115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3148.2006.00308.x

Brown, H. (1994). 'An ordinary sexual life?’ A review of the normalisation principle as it applies to the sexual options of people with learning disabilities. Disability & Society, 9, 123-144. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599466780181

Bruder, C., & Kroese, B. (2005). The efficacy of interventions designed to prevent and protect people with intellectual disabilities from sexual abuse: A review of the literature. The Journal of Adult Protection, 7(2), 13-27. https://doi.org/10.1108/14668203200500009

Chadwick, D., Wesson, C., & Fullwood, C. (2013). Internet access by people with intellectual disabilities: Inequalities and opportunities. Future Internet, 5, 376-397. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi5030376

Cohen, N. Z., & Omery, A. (1994). Schools of phenomenology: Implications for research. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (pp. 136-156). Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications.

Collingridge, D, & Gantt, E. (2008).The quality of qualitative research. American Journal of Medical Quality, 23, 389- 395. https://doi.org/10.1177/1062860608320646

Correa, T., Hinsley, A., & de Zúñiga, H. (2010). Who interacts on the Web?: The intersection of users’ personality and social media use. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 247-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.09.003

Craft, A. (1987). Mental handicap and sexuality: Issues and perspectives. Turnbridge Wells: Costello.

Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Creswell, J., Hanson, W., Clark, P., & Morales, A. (2007). Qualitative research designs: Selection and implementation. Counselling Psychologist, 35, 236-264.

D’Aubin, A. (2007). Working for barrier removal in the ICT area: Creating a more accessible and inclusive Canada. The Information Society: An International Journal, 23, 193–201.

Delaney, C. (2003). Walking a fine line: Graduate nurses’ transition experiences during orientation. Journal of Nursing Education, 42, 437-443.

DiCicco-Bloom, B., & Crabtree, B. F. (2006). Making sense of qualitative research: The qualitative interview. Medical Education, 40, 314-321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02418.x

Di Giulio, G. (2003). Sexuality and people living with physical or developmental disabilities: A review of key issues. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 12, 53-68.

Dobransky, K., & Hargittai, E. (2006). The disability divide in internet access and use. Information, Communication & Society, 9, 313-334. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180600751298

Dowling, M., & Cooney, A. (2012). Research approaches related to phenomenology: Negotiating a complex landscape. Nurse Researcher, 20, 21-27. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2012.11.20.2.21.c9440

Flood, A. (2010). Understanding phenomenology. Phenomenology, 17(2), 7-15.

Fossey, E., Harvey, C., McDermott, F., & Davidson, L. (2002). Understanding and evaluating qualitative research. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 36, 717-732. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1614.2002.01100.x

Franco, D. G., Cardoso, J., & Neto, I. (2012). Attitudes towards affectivity and sexuality of people with intellectual disability. Sexuality and Disability, 30, 261-287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-012-9260-x

Gagnon, J. H., & Simon, W. (2005). Sexual Conduct. The Social Sources of Human Sexuality (2nd ed.). New Brunswick, London: Aldine Transaction.

Goggin, G. (2009). Disability, media, and the politics of vulnerability. Research Online, 1(19), 1-13.

Gutiérrez, P., & Martorell, A. (2011). People with intellectual disability and ICTs/Las personas con discapacidad intelectual ante las TIC. Comunicar, 18(36), 173-180. https://doi.org/10.3916/C36-2011-03-09

Hollomotz, A. (2011). Learning difficulties and sexual vulnerability: A social approach. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

Jaeger, P. T. (2012). Disability and the Internet: Confronting a digital divide. Disability and the Internet. Lynne Rienner Publishers.

Kulick, D., & Rydström, J. (2015). Loneliness and its opposite: Sex, disability, and the ethics of engagement. Duke University Press.

Lazar, J., & Jaeger, P. (2011). Reducing Barriers to online access for people with disabilities. Issues in Science and Technology, 27(2), 69-82.

Lester, S. (1999). An introduction to phenomenological research. Taunton UK: Stan Lester Developments. Retrieved from https://www.rgs.org/NR/rdonlyres/F50603E0-41AF-4B15-9C84-BA7E4DE8CB4F/0/Seaweedphenomenologyresearch.pdf

Liamputtong, P. (2009). Qualitative data analysis: Conceptual and practical considerations. Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 20, 133-139.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Löfgren-Mårtenson, L. (2004). "May I?" About sexuality and love in the new generation with intellectual disabilities. Sexuality and Disability, 22, 197-207. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SEDI.0000039062.73691.cb

Löfgren-Mårtenson, L. (2008). Love in cyberspace: Swedish young people with intellectual disabilities and the Internet. Scandinavian Journal of Disability, 10, 125-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/15017410701758005

Lowes, L., & Prowse, M. A. (2001). Standing outside the interview process? The illusion of objectivity in phenomenological data generation. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 38, 471-480. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7489(00)00080-8

MacDougall, C., & Fudge, E. (2001). Planning and recruiting the sample for focus groups and in-depth interviews. Qualitative Health Research, 11, 117-126. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973201129118975

Mackey, S. (2005). Phenomenological nursing research: Methodological insights derived from Heidegger's interpretive phenomenology. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 42, 179-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2004.06.011

McCarthy, M. (2014). Women with intellectual disability: Their sexual lives in the 21st century, Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 39, 24-131. https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2014.894963

McDonagh, R., (2007). Too sexed-up! The Journal of Adult Protection, 9(4), 27-33. https://doi.org/10.1108/14668203200700025

McRuer, R., & Mollow, A. (2012). Sex and disability. Duke University Press.

Murphy, G. H. (2003). Capacity to consent to sexual relationships in adults with learning disabilities. Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health, 29, 148-149. https://doi.org/10.1783/147118903101197520

Parchomiuk, M. (2012). Model of intellectual disability and the relationship of attitudes towards the sexuality of persons with an intellectual disability. Sexuality and Disability, 31, 125-139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-012-9285-1

Parley, F. (2010). What does vulnerability mean? British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 266-276. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3156.2010.00663.x

Pietkiewicz, I., & Smith, J. A. (2014). A practical guide to using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis in qualitative research psychology. Psychological Journal, 20(1), 7-14.

Priest, H. (2002). An approach to the phenomenological analysis of data. (Issues in research). Nurse Researcher, 10(2), 50-63.

Raacke, J., & Bonds-Raacke, J. (2008). MySpace and Facebook: Applying the uses and gratifications theory to exploring friend-networking sites. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11, 169-174. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.0056

Reid, G. G., & Boyer, W. (2013). Social network sites and young adolescent identity development. Childhood Education, 89, 243-253. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2013.815554

Rogers, C. (2009). (S)excerpts from a life told: Sex, gender and learning disability. Sexualities, 12, 270-288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460709103891

Seymour, D., & Lupton, W. (2000). Technology, selfhood and physical disability. Social Science & Medicine, 50, 1851-1862. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00422-0

Shakespeare, T. (2008). Debating disability. Journal of Medical Ethics, 34, 11-14.

Shakespeare, T., Gillespie-Sells, K., & Davies, D. (1996). The sexual politics of disability: Untold desires. Burns & Oates.

Smith, J A. (1996). Beyond the divide between cognition and discourse: Using interpretative phenomenological analysis in health psychology. Psychology and Health, 11, 261-271. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870449608400256

Smith, J., & Osborne, M. (2003). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology. A practical guide to research methods (pp. 51-80). London: Sage Publications.

Smith, J., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. London: Sage Publications.

Stendal. K. (2012). How do people with disability use and experience virtual worlds and ICT: A literature review. Virtual Worlds Research, 5(1), 1–17.

Swango-Wilson, A. (2010). Systems theory and the development of sexual identity for individuals with intellectual/developmental disability. Sexuality and Disability, 28, 157-164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-010-9167-3

Sweeney, L. (2007). The importance of human sexuality education for students with disability. The Exceptional Parent, 37(9), 36-39.

Todres, L., & Wheeler, S. (2001). The complementarity of phenomenology, hermeneutics and existentialism as a philosophical perspective for nursing research. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 38(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7489(00)00047-X

United Nations (2006). The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. USA: Author.

Van der Zalm, J., & Bergum, V. (2000). Hermeneutic-phenomenology: Providing living knowledge for nursing practice Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31, 211-218. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01244.x

https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2017-1-9