A review of pornography use research: Methodology and results from four sources

Vol.9,No.4(2015)

Abstract
The widespread electronic transmission of pornography allows for a variety of new data sources to objectively measure pornography use. Recent studies have begun to use these data to rank order US states by per capita online pornography use and to identify the determinants of pornography use at the state level. The aim of this paper is to compare two previous methodologies for evaluating pornography use by state, as well as to measure online pornography use using multiple data sources. We find that state-level rankings from Pornhub.com, Google Trends, and the New Family Structures Survey are significantly correlated with each other. In contrast, we find that rankings based on data from a single large paid subscription pornography website has no significant correlation with rankings based on the other three data sources. Since so much of online pornography is accessed for free, research based solely on paid subscription data may yield misleading conclusions.

Keywords:
Pornography; internet use; data; representative
Author biographies

Michael Gmeiner

Michael Gmeiner will graduate with a BS in Mathematics and a BS in Economics from Brigham Young University in December 2015. He will begin graduate studies in Economics in fall 2016.

Joseph Price

Joseph Price received a BS in Economics from Brigham Young University in 2003 and a Ph.D. in Economics from Cornell University in 2007. He is an Associate Professor of Economics at Brigham Young University.

Michael Worley

Michael Worley holds a J.D. in Law, and a B.A./B.S. in Economics/Mathematics, both from Brigham Young University.
References

Bergen, R., & Bogle, K. (2000). Exploring the connection between pornography and sexual violence. Violence and Victims, 15, 227-234. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.15.3.227

Buzzell, T. (2005). Demographic characteristics of persons using pornography in three technological contexts. Sexuality & Culture. 9, 28-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02908761

Carneiro, H. A., & Mylonakis, E. (2009). Google trends: A web‐based tool for real‐time surveillance of disease outbreaks. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 49, 1557-1564. https://doi.org/10.1086/630200

Choi, H., & Varian, H. (2012). Predicting the present with Google trends. Economic Record, 88(s1), 2-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.2012.00809.x

Cooper, A. (1998). Sexuality and the internet: Surfing into the new millennium. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 1, 187-193. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.1998.1.187

Doran, K. (2010). Industry size, measurement, and social costs. In M. Eberstadt & M. A. Layden (Eds.), The social costs of pornography: A collection of papers. Princeton, NJ: The Witherspoon Institute.

Doran, K., & Price, J. (2014). Pornography and Marriage. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 35, 489-498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-014-9391-6

Edelman, B. (2009). Markets: Red light states: Who buys online adult entertainment? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(1), 209-220. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.23.1.209

Fisher, R. (1993). Social desirability bias and validity of indirect questioning. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 303-315. https://doi.org/10.1086/209351

Glaeser, E., & Sacerdote, B. (2007). Aggregation reversals and the social formation of beliefs. NBER Working Paper No. 13031. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w13031.pdf

Glaeser, E., & Sacerdote, B. (2008). Education and Religion. Journal of Human Capital, 2, 188-215. https://doi.org/10.1086/590413

Hertlein, K., & Stevenson, A. (2010). The seven “As” contributing to internet-related intimacy problems: A literature review. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 4(1), article 1. Retrieved from http://www.cyberpsychology.eu/view.php?cisloclanku=2010050202

Ho, W., & Watters, P. (2004). Statistical and structural approaches to filtering internet Pornography. In Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2004 IEEE International Conference on: vol. 5, (pp. 4792-4798).

MacInnis, C., & Hodson, G. (2014). Do American states with more religious or conservative populations search more for sexual content on Google? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 137-147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0361-8

Patterson, R., & Price, J. (2012). Pornography, religion, and the happiness gap: Does pornography impact the actively religious differently? Journal of the Scientific Study of Religion, 51, 79-89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2011.01630.x

Preis, T., Moat, H., & Stanley, H. (2013). Quantifying trading behavior in financial markets using Google Trends. Scientific Reports, 3, 1684.

Sevcikova, A., & Daneback, K. (2014). Online pornography use in adolescence: Age and gender differences. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 11, 674-686. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2014.926808

Stack, S., Wasserman, I., & Kern, R. (2004). Adult social bonds and the use of internet pornography. Social Science Quarterly, 85, 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.08501006.x

Stoops, J. (2015). Class and gender dynamics of the pornography trade in late nineteenth-century Britain. The Historical Journal, 58, 137-156. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0018246X14000090

Traeen, B., & Daneback, K. (2013). The use of pornography and sexual behaviour among Norwegian men and women of differing sexual orientation. Sexologies, 22, e41-e48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sexol.2012.03.001

Tripodi, F., Eleuteri, S., Giuliani, M., Rossi, R., Livi, S., Petruccelli, I., Petruccelli, F., Daneback, K., & Simonelli C. (2015). Unusual online sexual interests in heterosexual Swedish and Italian university students. Sexologies, Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sexol.2015.03.003

Wright, P. (2011). U.S. males and pornography, 1973–2010: Consumption, predictors, correlates. Journal of Sex Research, 50, 60-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2011.628132

Young, K., & Case, C. (2004). Internet Abuse in the Workplace: New Trends in Risk Management. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 7, 105-111. https://doi.org/10.1089/109493104322820174

Metrics

13019

Views

2206

PDF views