Gendered mediation of children’s internet use: A keyhole for looking into changing socialization practices

Vol.9,No.1(2015)
Special issue: Mediation of Children´s ICT Usage

Abstract
This study focuses on parental mediation of children’s internet use in the context of broader gendered socialization patterns. Analyses were carried out in three steps using quantitative and qualitative methods. Firstly, based on EU Kids Online survey data, gendered patterns in parental mediation across European countries were explored. Secondly, detailed analysis of mediation practices in Estonia, one country in the EU Kids Online survey, was carried out. As the last step, data from two focus group interviews were used for in-depth analysis of Estonian mothers’ everyday practices of mediating their children’s internet use. Quantitative analysis revealed significant correlations between the number of gender differences in parental mediation, and country-level variables of internet penetration and gender equality. In Estonia, as a country with low gender equality, but high internet use, mediation strategies do not depend purely on children’s gender, but on a more complex interrelation of gender and children’s and parents’ socio-demographic characteristics and parent-child interactions. This finding was supported and explained by qualitative analysis, showing that Estonian mothers’ methods for mediating boys’ and girls’ internet use differ in several aspects, reflecting the broader context of changing socialization practices, gender norms, and the generation gap in using digital technologies.

Keywords:
Parental mediation; socialization; gender ideologies; cultural values
Author biographies

Kairi Talves

Author photo Kairi Talves is currently working on her PhD thesis in Sociology at the University of Tartu, Estonia. Her main fields of research are related to gender studies, more specifically to gendered patterns of parental behaviour and their impact on socialization and intergenerational relations. She has participated in several international research projects, focusing on gender inequalities, and she has published a number of research papers in academic journals and chapters in edited volumes.

Veronika Kalmus

Kalmus VeronikaVeronika Kalmus is a Professor of Sociology at the Institute of Social Studies, University of Tartu, Estonia. Her research focuses on socialization, inter-generational relationships, media use and cultural values. She leads several research projects, including “Generations and inter-generational relations in the emerging information society,” and participates in the project EU Kids Online. She has published extensively in international journals and collections, including Childhood, Children & Society, Discourse & Society, and Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication.
References

Aavik, K., & Uusma, H. (2014). Laste sotsialiseerimine, kogumikus Soolise võrdõiguslikkuse monitooring 2013 [Socialisation of children. In T. Roosalu (Ed.), Gender Equality Monitoring 2013] (pp. 26-36). Sotsiaalministeeriumi toimetised 3/2014. Retrieved from: http://www.sm.ee/sites/default/files/content-editors/Ministeerium_kontaktid/Uuringu_ja_analuusid/Sotsiaalvaldkond/sooline_vo_monitooring_2013_veeb.pdf

Bohle, D., & Greskovits, B. (2007). Neoliberalism, embedded neoliberalism and neocorporatism: Towards transnational capitalism in Central-Eastern Europe. West European Politics, 30, 443-466. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380701276287

Chakroff, J. L., & Nathanson, A. I. (2011). Parent and school interventions: Mediation and media literacy. In S. L. Calvert & B. J. Wilson (Eds.), The Handbook of children, media, and development (pp. 552-576). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

Eastin, M. S., Greenberg, B. S., & Hofschire, L. (2006). Parenting the internet. Journal of Communication, 56, 486-504. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00297.x

Flick, U. (2014). An introduction to qualitative research. London: Sage Publications.

Görzig, A. (2012). Methodological framework: the EU Kids Online project. In S. Livingstone, L. Haddon, & A. Görzig (Eds.), Children, risk and safety online: Research and policy challenges in comparative perspective (pp. 15-32). Bristol: The Policy Press.

Hedström, P., & Swedberg, R. (1998). Social mechanisms: An analytical approach to social theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Helsper, E. J., Kalmus, V., Hasebrink, U., Sagvari, B., & de Haan, J. (2013). Country classification: Opportunities, risks, harm and parental mediation. London: EU Kids Online. Retrieved from: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/52023/

Henwood, F., Plumeridge, S., & Stepulevage, L. (2000). A tale of two cultures? Gender and inequality in computer education. In S. Wyatt, F. Henwood, N. Miller, & P. Senker (Eds.), Technology and in/equality: Questioning the information society (pp. 111-128). London: Routledge.

Järviste, L. (2010). Gender equality and inequality: Attitudes and situation in Estonia in 2009. Series of the Ministry of Social Affairs, 3/2010. Retrieved from: http://www.gwi-boell.de/sites/default/files/assets/gwi-boell.de/images/downloads/series_20103eng.pdf

Kalmus, V. (2012). Making sense of the social mediation of children’s internet use: Perspectives for interdisciplinary and cross-cultural research. In C. W. Wijnen, S. Trültzsch, & C. Ortner (Eds.), Medienwelten im Wandel: Kommunikationswissenschaftliche Positionen, Perspektiven und Konsequenzen. Festschrift für Ingrid Paus-Hasebrink [Changing Media Worlds: Positions, Perspectives and Consequences in Communication Science. Festschrift in Honour of Ingrid Paus-Hasebrink] (pp. 137-149). Wien: Springer.

Kalmus, V. (2013). Children’s safety in the new media environment. In M. Heidmets (Ed.), Estonian Human Development Report 2012/2013: Estonia in the World (pp. 92-94). Tallinn: Estonian Cooperation Assembly. Retrieved from: http://www.kogu.ee/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/EIA2013_eng.pdf

Kalmus, V., & Roosalu, T. (2012). Institutional filters on children’s internet use: An additional explanation of cross-national differences in parental mediation. In M. Walrave, W. Heirman, S. Mels, C. Timmerman, & H. Vandebosch (Eds.), E-youth: Balancing between opportunities and risks (pp. 234-250). Brussels: Peter Lang.

Kalmus, V., von Feilitzen, C., & Siibak, A. (2012). Effectiveness of teachers’ and peers’ mediation in supporting opportunities and reducing risks online. In S. Livingstone, L. Haddon, & A. Görzig (Eds.), Children, risk and safety on the internet: Research and policy challenges in comparative perspective (pp. 245-256). Bristol: The Policy Press.

Kimmel, M., Hearn, J., & Connell, R. W. (2005). Handbook of studies on men and masculinity, London: Sage Publications.

Kirwil, L. (2009). Parental mediation of children’s internet use in different European countries. Journal of Children and Media, 3, 394-409. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482790903233440

Kirwil, L., Garmendia, M., Garitaonandia, C., & Martínez Fernández, G. (2009). Parental mediation. In S. Livingstone & L. Haddon (Eds.), Kids online: Opportunities and risks for children (pp. 199-215). Bristol: Policy Press.

Kutsar, D., Kasearu, K., & Kurrikoff, T. (2012). Family trends and changing parenting practices in Estonia. Cognition, Brain, Behaviour: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16, 171-190.

Lauristin, M. (1997). Context of transition. In M. Lauristin, P. Vihalemm, K. E. Rosengren, & L. Weibull (Eds.), Return to the western world. Cultural and political perspectives on the Estonian post-communist transition (pp. 25-40). Tartu, Estonia: Tartu University Press.

Lauristin, M. (2003). Social contradictions shadowing Estonia’s ‘success story’. Demokratizatsiya, 11, 601-616.

Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., Görzig, A., & Ólafsson, K. (2011). Risks and safety on the Internet: the perspective of European children. Full findings. LSE London: EU Kids Online. Retrieved from: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/33731/

Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. J. (2008). Parental mediation of children’s internet use. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 52, 581-599. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150802437396

Livingstone, S., Kalmus, V., & Talves, K. (2014). Girls’ and boys’ experiences of online risk and safety. In C. Carter, L. Steiner, & L. McLaughlin (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Media and Gender (pp. 190-200). London: Routledge.

Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research,1(2), Art. 20. Retrieved from: http://nbnresolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0002204

Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research (2nd ed). London: Sage Publications

Nikken, P., & Schols, M. (2015). How and why parents guide the media use of young children? Journal of Child and Family Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-015-0144-4

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed). London: Sage Publications.

Paus-Hasebrink, I., Ponte, C., Dürager, A., & Bauwens, J. (2012). Understanding digital inequality: the interplay between parental socialisation and children’s development. In S. Livingstone, L. Haddon, & A. Görzig (Eds.), Children, risk and safety on the internet: Research and policy challenges in comparative perspective (pp. 257-271). Bristol: The Policy Press.

Raudsepp, M., Tart, I., & Heinla, E. (2013). Post-socialist dynamics of value patterns in Estonia. Studies of Transition States and Societies, 5(2), 35-51. Retrieved from: http://publications.tlu.ee/index.php/stss/article/view/162

Rosen, L. D., Cheever, N. A., & Carrier, L. M. (2008). The association of parenting style and child age with parental limit setting and adolescent MySpace behavior. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29, 459-471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2008.07.005

Soo, K., Ainsaar, M., & Kalmus, V. (2012). Behind the curtains of e-state: Determinants of online sexual harassment among Estonian children. Studies of Transition States and Societies, 4(2), 35-48. Retrieved from: http://publications.tlu.ee/index.php/stss/article/view/95

Trost, J. (1986). Statistically nonrepresentative stratified sampling: A sampling technique for qualitative studies. Qualitative Sociology, 9(1), 54–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988249

Tulviste, T., Mizera, L., & De Geer, B. (2012), Socialization values in stable and changing societies: a comparative study of Estonian, Swedish and Russian Estonian mothers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43, 480-497. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022111401393

van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (2011). Equivalence and bias: a review of concepts, models, and data analytic procedures. In D. Matsumoto, & F. J. R. van den Vijver (Eds.), Cross-cultural research methods in psychology (pp. 17-45). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Vis, B., van Kersbergen, K., & Becker, U. (2008). The politics of welfare state reform in the Netherlands: Explaining a never-ending puzzle. Acta Politica, 43, 333-356. https://doi.org/10.1057/ap.2008.11

Metrics

3861

Views

1898

PDF views