Media representations and children’s discourses on online risks: Findings from qualitative research in nine European countries

Vol.8,No.2(2014)

Abstract
Prior research has pointed to cross-national variations in media attention for online risks, which are then mirrored in parental concerns regarding the internet. However, little is known so far about how the discursive environment around opportunities and risks of the internet for children shapes the very context in which children’s own perceptions are developed and their online experiences are situated. The aim of this contribution is threefold: (1) to understand how and to what extent children’s perceptions of online risks incorporate media representations, parental worries and discourses circulating among peers; (2) to identify any age- or gender-specific patterns in the appropriation and conversion of media, parents’ and peers’ discourses; and (3) to identify whether there are cross-cultural variations in risk perceptions.

Keywords:
Risk awareness, online risks, children, qualitative methods, cross-cultural research
Author biographies

Giovanna Mascheroni

Author photo Giovanna Mascheroni, PhD, is a Lecturer in Sociology of Communication and Culture in the Department of Sociology at Università Cattolica of Milan and a Visiting Fellow in the Department of Media and Communications at the London School of Economics and Political Science. She was the coordinator of the Net Children Go Mobile project and has been the national contact of the EU Kids Online network since 2007. She is also part of the research project, WebPolEU: Comparing Social Media and Political Participation across EU (http://www.webpoleu.net/).

Ana Jorge

Author photo Ana Jorge is a Postdoctoral Researcher and Guest Assistant Professor in New University of Lisbon, studying children and media. She holds a Media and Journalism Studies PhD from the same university and a Masters in Sociology of Communication from ISCTE, Lisbon. She takes part in RadioActive101 project (2013-14) and EU Kids Online network (2008-14).

Lorleen Farrugia

Author photo Lorleen Farrugia is a PhD Candidate at the University of Malta researching the understanding of online risks and safety by Maltese children. She has researched young people and self-disclosure on Reality TV. Lorleen has been a member of the EU Kids Online Network (www.eukidsonline.net) since 2012, and she is also a member of the Malta Communications Authority BeSmartOnline! Advisory Board.
References

Barbovschi, M., Green, L., & Vandoninck, S. (Eds.) (2013). Innovative approaches for investigating how children understand risk in new media. Dealing with methodological and ethical challenges. London: EU Kids Online. Retrieved from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/53060

Barbovschi, M., Marinescu, V., Velicu, A., & Laszlo, E. (2012). Meeting new contacts online. In S. Livingstone, L. Haddon, & A. Görzig (Eds.), Children, risk and safety on the internet (pp. 177-189). Bristol: Policy Press.

Bauman, Z. (1993). Postmodern ethics. Oxford: Blackwell.

Bauwens, J. (2012). Teenagers, the internet and morality. In E. Loos, L. Haddon, & E. Mante-Meijer (Eds.), Generational use of new media (pp. 31-47). Aldershot: Ashgate.

Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.

Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. Garden City, NY: Anchor.

Critcher, C. (2003). Moral panics and the media. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Davis, J. M. (1998). Understanding the meanings of children: A reflexive process. Children & Society, 12, 325-335. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.1998.tb00089.x

Drotner, K. (1999). Dangerous media? Pedagogica Historica, 35, 593-619.

European Commission (2008). Towards a safer use of the Internet for children in the EU: A parents’ perspective. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/flash/fl_248_en.pdf

Farr, R. M., & Moscovici, S. (1984). Social representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Flores, A., & James, C. (2013). Morality and ethics behind the screen: Young people’s perspectives on digital life. New Media & Society, 15, 834-852. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812462842

Gerbner, G., & Gross, L. (1976). Living with television: The violence profile. Journal of Communication, 26, 173-199. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1976.tb01397.x

Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N. (1986). Living with television: The dynamics of the cultivation process. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Perspectives of media effects (pp. 17-40). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity.

Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity.

Goode, E., & Ben-Yehuda, N. (2010). Moral panics: The social construction of deviance. Oxford: Blackwell.

Haddon, L., & Stald, G. (2009). A comparative analysis of European press coverage of children and the internet. Journal of Children and Media, 3, 379-393. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482790903233432

Hagen, I., & Jorge, A. (forthcoming). Grey zones: Audience research, moral evaluations and online risk negotiation. In F. Zeller, C. Ponte, & B. O’Neill (Eds.), Revitalising audiences: Innovations in European audience research. London: Routledge.

Hasebrink, U., Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., & Ólafsson, K. (2009). Comparing children’s online opportunities and risks across Europe: Cross-national comparisons for EU Kids Online (2nd ed.). London: EU Kids Online. Retrieved from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/24368

Helsper, E. J., Kalmus, V., Hasebrink, U., Sagvari, B., & de Haan, J. (2013). Country classification: Opportunities, risks, harm and parental mediation. London: EU Kids Online. Retrieved from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/52023

Ito, M. (2009). Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out: Kids living and learning with new media. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Jenkins, H. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Juvonen, J., & Gross, E. F. (2008). Extending the school grounds? Bullying experiences in cyberspace. Journal of School Health, 78, 496-505. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2008.00335.x

Levy, N., Cortesi, S., Crowley, E., Beaton, M., Casey, J., & Nolan, C. (2012). Bullying in a networked era: A literature review. Berkman Center Research Publication, 17. Retrieved from http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/publications/2012/kbw_bulling_in_a_networked_era

Lewis, T. (2006). DIY selves? Reflexivity and habitus in young people’s use of the internet for health information. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 9, 461-479. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549406069068

Livingstone, S. (2003). On the challenges of cross-national comparative media research. European Journal of Communication, 18, 477-500. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323103184003

Livingstone, S. (2013). Online risk, harm and vulnerability: Reflections on the evidence base for child internet safety policy. Zer: Revista De Estudios De Comunicación= Komunikazio Ikasketen Aldizkaria,18 (35), 13-28.

Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., Görzig, A., & Ólafsson, K. (2011). Risks and safety on the internet: The perspective of European children. Full findings. London: EU Kids Online. Retrieved from http://www.lse.ac.uk/media%40lse/research/EUKidsOnline/EU%20Kids%20II%20%282009-11%29/EUKidsOnlineIIReports/D4FullFindings.pdf

Livingstone, S. & Haddon, L. (2012). Theoretical framework for children’s internet use. In S. Livingstone & L. Haddon (Eds), Children, risk and safety on the internet (pp. 1-14). Bristol, UK: Policy Press.

Livingstone, S., Kirwil, L., Ponte, C., & Staksrud, E. (2013). In their own words: What bothers children online? London: EU Kids Online. Retrieved from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/48357

Lupton, D. (1999). Risk. London: Routledge.

McCombs, M. (2005). A look at agenda-setting: Past, present and future. Journalism Studies, 6, 543-557. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700500250438

Machackova, H., Cerna, A., Sevcikova, A., Dedkova, L., & Daneback, K. (2013). Effectiveness of coping strategies for victims of cyberbullying. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 7(3), article 5. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2013-3-5

Marwick, A., & boyd, d. (2014). “It’s just drama”: Teen perspectives on conflict and aggression in a networked era. Journal of Youth Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2014.901493

Mascheroni, G., & Ólafsson, K. (2014). Net Children Go Mobile: Risks and opportunities. Second edition. Milan: Educatt. Retrieved from www.netchildrengomobile.eu/reports

Pasquier, D. (2005). Cultures Lycéennes: La tyrannie de la majorité [Youth cultures: The tiranny of the majority]. Paris: Éditions Autrement.

Ponte, C., & Simões, J. A. (2009). Asking parents about children’s internet use: Comparing findings about parental mediation in Portugal and other European countries. EU Kids Online – Final conference. Retrieved from www.fcsh.unl.pt/eukidsonline/docs/Asking%20parents-FINAL%20Paper1_27-05-09.pdf

Ponte, C., Bauwens, J., & Mascheroni, G. (2009). Children and the internet in the news: Agency, voices and agendas. In S. Livingstone & L. Haddon (Eds.), Kids Online: Opportunities and risks for children (pp. 159-172). Bristol: Policy Press.

Ponte, C., Simões, J. A., & Jorge, A. (2013). Do questions matter on children’s answers about internet risk and safety?. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 7(1), article 1. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2013-1-2

Potter, J. (2004). Discourse analysis. In M. Hardy & A. Bryman (Eds.), Handbook of data analysis (pp. 607-624). London: Sage.

Rennie, D. L., Phillips, J. R., & Quartaro, G. K. (1988). Grounded theory: A promising approach to conceptualization in psychology. Canadian Psychology, 29, 139-150. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0079765

Ringrose, J., Harvey, L., Gill, R., & Livingstone, S. (2013). Teen girls, sexual double standards and “sexting”: Gendered value in digital image exchange. Feminist Theory, 14, 305-323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700113499853

Schrock, A. & boyd, D. (2008). Online threats to youth: Solicitation, harassment, and problematic content: Literature review prepared for the Internet Safety Technical Task Force. Retrieved from http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/sites/cyber.law.harvard.edu/files/RAB_Lit_Review_121808_0.pdf

Smahel, D., & Wright, M. (2014). Meaning of Online problematic situation for children. Results of qualitative cross‐cultural investigation in nine European countries. London: EU Kids Online. Retrieved from http://www.lse.ac.uk/media@lse/research/EUKidsOnline/EU%20Kids%20III/Reports/D4.2MeaningsReport.pdf

Staksrud, E., & Livingstone, S. (2009). Children and online risk: Powerless victims or resourceful participants? Information, Communication and Society, 12, 364-387. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180802635455

Staksrud, E., & Ólafsson, K. (2013). Awareness. Strategies, mobilisation and effectiveness. In B. O’Neill, E. Staksrud, & S. McLaughlin (Eds.). Towards a better internet for children? (pp. 57-76). Göteborg: Nordicom.

Thompson, J. B. (1995). Media and modernity: A social theory of the media. Cambridge: Polity.

Threadgold, S., & Nilan, P. (2009). Reflexivity of contemporary youth, risk and cultural capital. Current Sociology, 57, 47-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392108097452

Tulloch, J., & Lupton, D. (2003). Risk and everyday life. London: Sage.

van Zoonen, L. (2012). I-pistemology: Changing truth claims in popular and political culture. European Journal of Communication, 27, 56-67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323112438808

Wall, E. & Olofsson, A. (2008). Young people making sense of risk: How meanings of risk are materialized within the social context of everyday life. Young, 16, 431-448. https://doi.org/10.1177/110330880801600405

Weaver, D. (2007). Thoughts on agenda setting, framing, and priming. Journal of Communication, 57, 142-147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00333.x

Wolak, J., Finkelhor, D., & Mitchell, K. (2008). Is talking online to unknown people always risky? Distinguishing online interaction styles in a national sample of youth Internet users. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11, 340-343. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.0044

Metrics

1441

Views

5160

HTML views