The effects of text, audio, video, and in-person communication on bonding between friends

Vol. 7No. 2 (2013)

Lauren E. Sherman Minas Michikyan Patricia M. Greenfield

https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2013-2-3

HTML
Abstract
Considerable research on computer-mediated communication has examined online communication between strangers, but little is known about the emotional experience of connectedness between friends in digital environments. However, adolescents and emerging adults use digital communication primarily to communicate with existing friends rather than to make new connections. We compared feelings of emotional connectedness as they occurred in person and through digital communication among pairs of close friends in emerging adulthood. Fifty-eight young women, recruited in pairs of close friends, engaged in four conversations each: in-person, video chat, audio chat, and instant messaging (IM). Bonding in each condition was measured through both self-report and affiliation cues (i.e., nonverbal behaviors associated with the emotional experience of bonding). Participants reported feeling connected in all conditions. However, bonding, as measured by both self-report and affiliation cues, differed significantly across conditions, with the greatest bonding during in-person interaction, followed by video chat, audio chat, and IM in that order. Compared with other participants, those who used video chat more frequently reported greater bonding with friends through video chat in our study. Compared with other participants, those who spoke on the phone more frequently with their participating friend reported greater bonding during audio chat. Use of textual affiliation cues like emoticons, typed laughter, and excessive letter capitalization during IM related to increased bonding experience during IM. Nonetheless, a significantly lower level of bonding was experienced in IM compared with in-person communication. Because adolescent and emerging adults’ digital communication is primarily text-based, this finding has significant real-world implications.

Keywords:
Emerging adulthood, digital communication, friendship, bonding
##article.supplementary##
References

Antheunis, M. L., Schouten, A. P., Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2012). Interactive uncertainty reduction strategies and verbal affection in computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 39, 757-780. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211410420

Antheunis, M. L., Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2012). The quality of online, offline, and mixed-mode friendships among users of a social networking site. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 6(3), article 1. Retrieved from http://www.cyberpsychology.eu/view.php?cisloclanku=2012120304. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2012-3-6

Antheunis, M. L., Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2007). Computer-mediated communication and interpersonal attraction: An experimental test of two explanatory hypotheses. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10, 831-836. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.9945

Arnett, J. J. (2001). Conceptions of the transition to adulthood: Perspectives from adolescence to midlife. Journal of Adult Development, 8, 133-143.

Arnett, J. J., & Schwab, J. (2013). The Clark University Poll of Emerging Adults, 2012: Thriving, struggling, and hopeful. Worcester, MA: Clark University.

Baird, A. A. (2010). The terrible twelves. In P. D. Zelazo, M. Chandler, & E. Crone (Eds.), Developmental social cognitive neuroscience (pp. 191–207). New York, NY: Psychology Press.

Bargh, J. A., McKenna, K. Y., & Fitzsimons, G. M. (2002). Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the "true self" on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 33-48. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00247

Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497

Burgoon, J. K., Bonito, J. A., Ramirez, A., Dunbar, N. E., Kam, K., & Fischer, J. (2002). Testing the interactivity principle: Effects of mediation, propinquity, and verbal and nonverbal modalities in interpersonal interaction. Journal of Communication, 52, 657-677. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02567.x

Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32, 554-571. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554

Duggan, M., & Brenner, J. (2013). The demographics of social media users – 2012. Pew Internet & American life project. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Social-media-users.aspx

Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Social capital and college students' use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143-1168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x

George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Gonzaga, G. C., Keltner, D., Londahl, E. A., & Smith, M. D. (2001). Love and the commitment problem in romantic relations and friendship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 247-262. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.2.247

Gonzaga, G. C., Turner, R. A., Keltner, D., Campos, B., & Altemus, M. (2006). Romantic love and sexual desire in close relationships. Emotion, 6, 163-179. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.6.2.163

Goren, C. C., Sarty, M., & Wu, P. Y. (1975). Visual following and pattern discrimination of face-like stimuli by newborn infants. Pediatrics, 56, 544-549.

Gross, E. F. (2004). Adolescent internet use: What we expect, what teens report. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 25, 633-649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2004.09.005

Henderson, S., & Gilding, M. (2004). “I’ve never clicked this much with anyone in my life:” Trust and hyperpersonal communication in online friendships. New Media and Society, 6, 487-506. https://doi.org/10.1177/146144804044331

IBM Corp. (2012). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.

Keltner, D., & Bonanno, G. A. (1997). A study of laughter and dissociation: Distinct correlates of laughter and smiling during bereavement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 687–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.4.687

Lenhart, A. (2012). Teens & online video. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Teens-and-online-video.aspx

Lenhart, A., Madden, M., Smith, A., Purcell, K., Zickuhr, K., & Rainie, L. (2011). Teens, kindness and cruelty on social network sites. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Teens-and-social-media.aspx

Lo, S. (2008). The nonverbal communication functions of emoticons in computer-mediated communication. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11, 595-597. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.0132

Ma, C. Q., & Huebner, E. S. (2008). Attachment relationships and adolescents' life satisfaction: Some relationships matter more to girls than boys. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 177-190. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20288

Manago, A. M., Taylor, T., & Greenfield, P. M. (2012). Me and my 400 friends: The anatomy of college students' Facebook networks, their communication patterns, and well-being. Developmental Psychology, 48, 369-380. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026338

McClure, E. B., Monk, C. S., Nelson, E. E., Zarahn, E., Leibenluft, E., Bilder, R. M., et al. (2004). A developmental examination of gender differences in brain engagement during evaluation of threat. Biological Psychiatry, 55, 1047-1055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.02.013

Messinger, D. S., Fogel, A., & Dickson, K. L. (2001). All smiles are positive, but some smiles are more positive than others. Developmental Psychology, 37, 642-653. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.37.5.642

Mol, E. M. M., Krahmer, E. J., Maes, A., & Swerts, M. (2011). Seeing and being seen: The effects on gesture production. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 17, 77-100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2011.01558.x

Parkins, R. (2012). Gender and emotional expressiveness: An analysis of prosodic features in emotional expression. Griffith Working Papers in Pragmatics and Intercultural Communication 5, 46-54.

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives and digital immigrants, MCB University Press, 9(5), 1-6.

Ray, G. B., & Floyd, K. (2006). Nonverbal expressions of liking and disliking in initial interactions: Encoding and decoding perspectives. Southern Communication Journal, 71, 45-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/10417940500503506

Reich, S. M., Subrahmanyam, K., & Espinoza, G. (2012). Friending, IMing, and hanging out face-to-face: Overlap in adolescents' online and offline social networks. Developmental Psychology, 48, 356-368. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026980

Seltzer, L.J., Prososki, A.R., Ziegler, T.E., and Pollak, S.D. (2012). Instant messages versus human speech: Hormones and why we still need to hear each another. Evolution and Human Behavior. 33, 42-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.05.004

Short, J. A., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Small, G., & Vorgan, G. (2008). iBrain: Surviving the technological alteration of the modern mind. New York, NY: HarperCollins.

Steinberg, L. (2005). Cognitive and affective development in adolescence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 69–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.005

Stern, S. T. (2007). Instant identity: Adolescent girls and the world of instant messaging. New York, NY: Peter Lang.

Subrahmanyam, K., Reich, S. M., Waechter, N., & Espinoza, G. (2008). Online and offline social networks: Use of social networking sites by emerging adults. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29, 420-433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2008.07.003

Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. CyberPsychology & Behavior 7, 321-326. https://doi.org/10.1089/1094931041291295

Tidwell, L. C., & Walther, J. B. (2002). Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations: Getting to know one another a bit at a time. Human Communication Research, 28, 317-348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00811.x

Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., & Liszkowski, U. (2007). A new look at infant pointing. Child development, 78, 705-722. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01025.x

Turkle, S. (2012). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2007). Preadolescents’ and adolescents’ online communication and their closeness to friends. Developmental Psychology, 43, 267-277. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.2.267

Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2009). Social consequences of the Internet for adolescents: A decade of research. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01595.x

Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19, 52-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365092019001003

Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3-43. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365096023001001

Walther J. B. & D’Addario K. P. (2001). The impact of emoticons in message interpretation in computer-mediated communication. Social Science Computer Review, 19, 324-347. https://doi.org/10.1177/089443930101900307

Walther, J. B., Loh, T., & Granka, L. (2005). Let me count the ways: The interchange of verbal and nonverbal cues in computer-mediated and face-to-face affinity. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 24, 36-65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X04273036

Williams, E. (1977). Experimental comparisons of face-to-face and mediated communication: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 963-976. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.963

More information
Metrics

57

67

15598

Views

66418

HTML views

HTML