To tell or not to tell? Youth’s responses to unwanted Internet experiences

Abstract

This study is one of the first that investigated youth’s response to unwanted Internet experiences, not only for those youth who were bothered or distressed but for all youth who reported the experience. Three types of response were examined: telling someone about the incident and ending the unwanted situation by active or passive coping. Responses to the following unwanted Internet experiences were analysed: Sexual solicitation, online harassment and unwanted exposure to pornography. The study was based on data from the Third Youth Internet Safety Survey (YISS-3), a telephone survey with a nationally representative U.S. sample of 1,560 Internet users, ages 10 to 17, and their caretakers. Youth’s responses to unwanted Internet experiences differ depending on the type of unwanted experiences, whether they are distressed or have other negative reactions caused by the incident and – to some degree – other youth characteristics and incident characteristics. For example, not all youth who are distressed tell someone and not all youth who tell someone are distressed. Also, the reasons for telling may differ depending on whom they tell, and youth tell somebody less often about their victimization if they also are online perpetrators, but of different types of unwanted Internet experiences. Internet safety information for parents and parents’ active mediation of Internet safety does not seem to result in youth telling more often about unwanted Internet experiences.

Bibliographic citation

Priebe, G., Mitchell, K. J., & Finkelhor, D. (2013). To tell or not to tell? Youth’s responses to unwanted Internet experiences. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 7(1), Article 6. doi:https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2013-1-6

Keywords

coping; disclosure; online harassment; Internet; youth

Full Text:

HTML

References

Show references Hide references

American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR) (2011). Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys (7th ed.). Retrieved from: http://www.aapor.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Standard_Definitions2&Template=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=3156

Brick, J. M., Brick, P. D., Dipko, S., Presser, S., Tucker, C., & Yuan, Y. (2007). Cell phone survey feasibility in the US: Sampling and calling cell numbers versus landline numbers. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71, 23-39. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfl040

Common Sense Media (2012). Internet safety tips for elementary school kids. Retrieved from: http://www.commonsensemedia.org/advice-for-parents/internet-safety-tips-elementary-school-kids

Curtin, R., Presser, S., & Singer, E. (2005). Changes in telephone survey nonresponse over the past quarter century. Public Opinion Quarterly, 69, 87-98. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfi002

Dürager, A., & Livingstone, S. (2012). How can parents support children's Internet safety? LSE, London: EU Kids Online. Retrieved from: http://www2.lse.ac.uk/media@lse/research/EUKidsOnline/EU%20Kids%20III/Reports/ParentalMediation.pdf

Hasebrink, U., Görzig, A., Haddon, L., Kalmus, V., & Livingstone, S. (2011). Patterns of risk and safety online. In-depth analyses from the EU Kids Online survey of 9-16 year olds and their parents in 25 countries. LSE, London: EU Kids Online. Retrieved from: http://www2.lse.ac.uk/media@lse/research/EUKidsOnline/EU%20Kids%20II%20(2009-11)/EUKidsOnlineIIReports/D5%20Patterns%20of%20risk.pdf

Hu, S. H. S., Balluz, L., Battaglia, M. P., & Frankel, M. R. (2010). The impact of cell phones on public health surveillance. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 88, 799-799. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.10.082669

IBM SPSS 19.0 (2011). Statistical package for the social sciences. Armonk NY: Pearson.

Jones, L. M., Mitchell, K. J., & Finkelhor, D. (2012). Trends in youth Internet victimization: Findings from three youth Internet safety surveys 2000-2010. Journal of Adolescent Health, 50, 179-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.09.015

Keeter, S., Kennedy, C., Dimock, M., Best, J., & Craighill, P. (2006). Gauging the impact of growing nonresponse on estimates from a national RDD telephone survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70, 759-779. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfl035

Kempf, A. M., & Remington, P. L. (2007). New challenges for telephone survey research in the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Public Health, 28, 113-126. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.28.021406.144059

Kia-Keating, M., Dowdy, E., Morgan, M. L., & Noam, G. G. (2011). Protecting and promoting: An integrative conceptual model for healthy development of adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 48, 220-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.08.006

Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. New York: Springer.

Leander, L., Christianson, S. Å., & Granhag, P. A. (2008). Internet-initiated sexual abuse: Adolescent victims' reports about on- and off-line sexual activities. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 1260-1274. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1433

Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., Görzig, A., & Ólafsson, K. (2011). Risks and safety on the Internet: The perspective of European children. Full findings. LSE, London: EU Kids Online. Retrieved from: http://www2.lse.ac.uk/media@lse/research/EUKidsOnline/EU%20Kids%20II%20(2009-11)/EUKidsOnlineIIReports/D4FullFindings.pdf

Mishna, F., Saini, M., & Solomon, S. (2009). Ongoing and online: Children and youth's perceptions of cyber bullying. Children and Youth Services Review, 31, 1222-1228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2009.05.004

Optem (2007). Safer Internet for children: Qualitative study in 29 European countries. Summary report: European commission. Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/quali/ql_safer_internet_summary.pdf

Pasupathi, M., McLean, K. C., & Weeks, T. (2009). To tell or not to tell: Disclosure and the narrative self. Journal of Personality, 77, 89-123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00539.x

Pearlin, L. I., & Schooler, C. (1978). The structure of coping. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 19, 2-21. https://doi.org/10.2307/2136319

Roth, S., & Cohen, L. J. (1986). Approach, avoidance, and coping with stress. American Psychologist, 41, 813-819. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.7.813

Safety Pledges (n.d.). Retrieved from: http://www.netsmartz.org/Resources/Pledges

Sleglova, V., & Cerna, A. (2011). Cyberbullying in adolescent victims: Perception and coping. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 5(2), article 4. Retrieved from: http://cyberpsychology.eu/view.php?cisloclanku=2011121901&article=4

Sourander, A., Brunstein Klomek, A., Ikonen, M., Lindroos, J., Luntamo, T., Koskelainen, M., … Helenius, H. (2010). Psychosocial risk factors associated with cyberbullying among adolescents: A population-based study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 67, 720-728. https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.79

Staksrud, E., & Livingstone, S. (2009). Children and online risk: Powerless victims or resourceful participants? Information, Communication & Society, 12, 364-387. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180802635455

Ybarra, M. L., Mitchell, K. J., Wolak, J., & Finkelhor, D. (2006). Examining characteristics and associated distress related to Internet harassment: Findings from the Second Youth Internet Safety Survey. Pediatrics, 118, e1169-e1177. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-0815

https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2013-1-6


Crossref Cited-by (8)

The listed references are provided by Cited-by (Crossref service) and thus do not represent the full list of sources citing the article.

1. Individual factors predicting reactions to online harassment among Finnish professionals
Magdalena Celuch, Nina Savela, Reetta Oksa, Rita Latikka, Atte Oksanen
Computers in Human Behavior  vol: 127,  first page: 107022,  year: 2022  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107022

2. Victimización y perpetración de la violencia de pareja adolescente: Un modelo predictivo
Jaime Humberto MORENO-MÉNDEZ, María Margarita ROZO-SÁNCHEZ, Sandra Jimena PERDOMO-ESCOBAR, Bertha Lucía AVENDAÑO-PRIETO
Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas)  vol: 36,  year: 2019  
https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0275201936e180146

3. Coping and Sexual Harassment: How Victims Cope across Multiple Settings
Jennifer A. Scarduzio, Sarah E. Sheff, Mathew Smith
Archives of Sexual Behavior  vol: 47,  issue: 2,  first page: 327,  year: 2018  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1065-7

4. Proceedings of International Conference on Recent Advancement on Computer and Communication
Husin Jazri, Elizabeth Paulus, Dharm Singh Jat, Durgesh Kumar Mishra
ISBN 978-981-10-8198-9  Chapter 70,  first page: 673,  year: 2018  
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8198-9_70

5. Reference Module in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Psychology
S.K. Wurtele
ISBN 9780128093245  year: 2017  
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.05192-0

6. Children’s critical evaluation of parental mediation
Leslie Haddon
Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace  vol: 9,  issue: 1,  year: 2015  
https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2015-1-2

7. Parental regulation of online behavior and cyber aggression: Adolescents’ experiences and perspectives
Sara E. Goldstein
Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace  vol: 9,  issue: 4,  year: 2015  
https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2015-4-2

8. Cyber-harassment victimization in Portugal: Prevalence, fear and help-seeking among adolescents
Filipa Pereira, Brian H. Spitzberg, Marlene Matos
Computers in Human Behavior  vol: 62,  first page: 136,  year: 2016  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.039




Copyright (c) 2013 Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.