Are we the same online? The expression of the five factor personality traits on the computer and the Internet

Tim Blumer; Nicola Döring

doi:10.5817/CP2012-3-5

Are we the same online? The expression of the five factor personality traits on the computer and the Internet

Vol.6,No.3(2012)

Tim Blumer Nicola Döring

https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2012-3-5

How to Cite:

Blumer, T., & Döring, N. (2012). Are we the same online? The expression of the five factor personality traits on the computer and the Internet. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 6(3), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2012-3-5

HTML

Abstract

The article distinguishes between different perspectives of contemporary research on personality and Internet usage. An open question concerns how personality is expressed on the Internet. Although some authors postulate a structural change of personality on the Internet, the precondition of cross-situational consistency rather speaks for just a different, situation-dependent expression of personality on the Internet. This study provides an initial empirical approach to the question of whether the five factor personality traits – exemplary for the whole personality of a person – express differently on the computer and on the Internet. Therefore, the five factors of 122 student participants were measured by the NEO-FFI. In a second step, the same subjects completed a modified version of the NEO-FFI, in which all items refer to computer-mediated communication. Results indicate that with regard to four of the five factors, the absolute influence of personality on behavior and experience decreases in favor of situational impact. In the case of neuroticism, a different effect occurred. On the computer and the Internet participants report higher emotional stability than in the offline world.

Keywords:
big five; five factors; computer-mediated communication; person-situation controversy; cross-situational consistency

Author biographies

Tim Blumer

Tim Blumer is a PhD candidate at Ilmenau University of Technology, Germany. His research interests focus on media psychology, advertising psychology, and consumer psychology. He has been working as a lecturer at Berlin University of the Arts for several years.

Nicola Döring

Nicola Döring is head of the research group on media psychology and media design at Ilmenau University of Technology in Germany. Her research interests include the psychology and design of online, mobile and human robot communication, learning and teaching with new media, gender and sexuality issues related to media and technology. She also teaches courses on and writes about social scientific research methods and evaluation.

References

Amichai-Hamburger, Y., Kaplan, H., & Dorpatcheon, N. (2008). Click to the past: The impact of extroversion by users of nostalgic websites on the use of Internet social services. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1907-1912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.005

Amichai-Hamburger, Y., & Vinitzky G. B. (2010). Social network use and personality. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1289-1295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.018

Amichai-Hamburger, Y., Wainapel, G., & Fox, S. (2002). “On the Internet no one knows I’m an introvert”: Extroversion, neuroticism, and Internet interaction. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 5, 125-128. https://doi.org/10.1089/109493102753770507

Blumer, T., & Renneberg, B. (2010). Easy living in a virtual world? Borderline-specific cognitions and Internet usage. Zeitschrift für Psychiatrie, Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 58, 55-62.

Borkenau, P., & Ostendorf, F. (1993). NEO-Fünf-Faktoren Inventar nach Costa McCrae. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

Castells, M. (2001). The Internet galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, business, and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Colquitt, J. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., LePine, J. A., & Sheppard, L. (2002). Computer-assisted communication and team decision-making performance: The moderating effect of openness to experience. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 402-410. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.402

Correa, T., Hinsley, A. W., & de Zúñiga, H. G. (2010). Who interacts on the Web?: The intersection of users’ personality and social media use. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 247-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.09.003

Costa, P., Terracciano, A., & McCrae, R. R. (2001). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 322-331. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.2.322

Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO personality inventory manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources Inc.

Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and the NEO Five-Factor inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources Inc.

Cronbach, L., & Snow, R. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions. New York: Irvington.

Ehrenberg, A., Juckes, S., White, K. M., & Walsh, S. P. (2008). Personality and self-esteem as predictors of young people’s technology use. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11, 739-741. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2008.0030

Endler, N. S., & Magnusson, D. (Eds.) (1976). Interactional psychology and personality, England: Hemisphere.

Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology,(Vol. 1, pp. 141-165). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Guadagno, R., Okdie, B., & Eno, C. (2008). Who blogs? Personality predictors of blogging. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1993-2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.09.001

Hardie, E., & Tee, M. Y. (2007). Excessive Internet use : The role of personality, loneliness and social support networks in Internet addiction. Society, 5, 34-47.

Hertel, G., Schroer, J. , Batinic, B., & Naumann, S. (2008). Do shy people prefer to send e-mail? Social Psychology, 39, 231-243. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335.39.4.231

Kennedy, H. (2006). Beyond anonymity, or future directions for Internet identity research. New Media & Society, 8, 859-876.

Kiesler, S., & Kraut, R. (1999). Internet use and ties that bind. Reply to comments. American Psychologist, 54, 783-784. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.9.783

Landers, R. N., & Lounsbury, J. W., (2006). An investigation of Big Five and narrow personality traits in relation to Internet usage. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 283-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.06.001

Li, L., Yang, Y., & Mingxin, L. (2006). The relationship between adolescents’ neuroticism, Internet service preference, and Internet addiction. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 38, 375-381.

Matthews, G., Deary, I. J., & Whiteman, M. C. (2003). Personality traits (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.

McCrae, R. R, & Costa, P. T. (1997). Conceptions and correlates of openness to experience. Handbook of personality psychology. In R. Hogan, J. A. Johnson & S. R. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 825-847). San Diego: Academic Press.

McElroy, J. C., Hendrickson, A. R., Townsend, A. M., & Demarie, S. M. (2007). Dispositional factors in Internet use. MIS Quarterly, 31, 809-820. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148821

McKenna, K. Y., & Bargh, J. A. (2000). Plan 9 from cyberspace: The implications of the Internet for personality and social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 57–75.

Mehroof, M., & Griffiths M. D. (2010). Online gaming addiction: The role of sensation seeking, self-control, neuroticism, aggression, state anxiety, and trait anxiety. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13, 313-316.

Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159, 56-63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56

Mikami, A. Y., Szwedo, D. E., Allen, J. P., Evans, M. A., & Hare, A. L. (2010). Adolescent peer relationships and behavior problems predict young adults’ communication on social networking websites. Developmental Psychology, 46, 46-56. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017420

Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: John Wiley.

Mischel, W. (1977). The interaction of person and situation. In D. Magnusson & N. S. Endler (Eds.), Personality at the crossroads (pp. 333-352). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246-268. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.246

Muscanell, N. L., & Guadagno, R. E. (2011). Make new friends or keep the old: Gender and personality differences in social networking use. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 107-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.016

Pew Internet and American Life Project (2005). How men and women use the Internet. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2005/PIP_Women_and_Men_online.pdf.pdf

Ross, C., Orr, E. S., Sisic, M., Arseneault, J. M., Simmering, M. G., & Orr, R. R. (2009). Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 578-586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.024

Ryckman, R. M. (2008). Theories of personality (9th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Pub Co.

Steyer, R., Schmitt, M., & Eid, M. (1999). Latent-state-trait theory and research in personality and individual differences. European Journal of Personality, 13, 389-408. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199909/10)13:5<389::AID-PER361>3.0.CO;2-A

Saucier, G. (1994). Mini-Markers: A brief version of Goldberg’s unipolar Big-Five markers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 506-516. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6303_8

Stritzke, W. K., Nguyen, A., & Durkin, K. (2009). Shyness and computer-mediated communication: A self-presentational theory perspective. Media Psychology, 6, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532785xmep0601_1

Swickert, R. J., Hittner, J. B., Harris, J. L., & Herring, J. A. (2002). Relationships among Internet use, personality, and social support. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 437-451. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(01)00054-1

Tichenor, P., Donohue, G., & Olien, C. (1970). Mass media flow and differential growth in knowledge. Public Opinion Quarterly, 34, 159-170. https://doi.org/10.1086/267786

Tuten, T. L., & Bosnjak, M. (2001). Understanding differences in web usage: The role of need for cognition and the five factor model of personality. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 29, 391-398. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2001.29.4.391

Wehrli, S. (2008). Personality on social network sites: An application of the five factor model. ETH Zurich Sociology Working Paper No. 7.

Weiser, E. B. (2000). Gender differences in Internet use patterns and Internet application preferences: A two-sample comparison. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 3, 167-178. https://doi.org/10.1089/109493100316012

White, D. S., & Le Cornu, A. (2011). Visitors and residents: A new typology for online engagement. First Monday, 16(9). Retrived from http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/3171/3049. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v16i9.3171

Metrics