Ageing on-line in risk society: Elderly people managing the new risks via new media in the context of decreasing ontological security

Vol.6,No.2(2012)
Special issue: Generation and mediated relations

Abstract
This article proposes a theoretical framework for studying new media and its use by elderly people in risk society. Old people and their practices of new media use are discussed in light of the concepts of age cohort, generation and media generation. The article detects homology between individualization (a backbone of the second modernity as defined by Ulrich Beck) in the management of new risks and operation of new media language. Consequently, the concept of “double individualization of responsibility” is coined and connection is made to the effects of new media and new risks on ontological security. The argument is taken further onto the ground of critical gerontology, which claims that individual decision-making and fluidity of the second modernity is a source of insecurity and anxiety mainly for the old people. The article eventually presents the area of e-health as a research field for further exploration of how old people experience autonomy, individual decision making, and the absence of (or conflict with) external authority while dealing with the health risks on-line.

Keywords:
old age; media generation; new media; new risks; ontological security
Author biographies

Irena Carpentier Reifova

Author photo Irena Carpentier Reifova, Ph.D, is a lecturer and researcher at Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Media Studies. She is a research coordinator and teaches courses on critical media theories, cultural studies and media audiences. Her major scholarly interests are in television popular culture; with a special focus on Czechoslovak and Czech serial television fiction. She is a co-author of a student book on quantitative content analysis, editor of Dictionary of Media Communication, and translates media studies works from English. She is also a lecturer at ECREA Media and Communication Doctoral Summer School.

Sylvie Fišerová

Author photo Sylvie Fišerová is a Ph.D. student at the Department of Media Studies, Institute of Communication Studies and Journalism, Faculty of Social Sciences, Charles University in Prague. She received her master’s degree in Media Studies in 2009 at the same department. The thesis focused on the social use of TV evening news in young families. She is currently working on her PhD project that deals with the usage of new media by middle-aged people in the Czech Republic. Her research interests include social use of media, digital divides, media generations, and use of new media by specific age groups – especially middle aged people and elderly people.
References

Bakardjieva, M. (2005). Internet society: The Internet in everyday life. London: Sage.

Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.

Beck, U. (2004). Riziková společnost [Risk society]. Praha: Slon.

Bourdieu, P. (1993). Sociology in question. London: Sage.

Boyce, T., & Lewis, J. (2009). Climate change and media. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.

Bruns, A. (2007). Produsage, generation C, and their effects on the democratic process. Media in transitions 5: Creativity, ownership, and collaboration in the digital age. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Buckingham, D. & Willett, R. (2006). Digital generations: Children, young people, and new media. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Czaja, S. J. and Lee, C. C., 2007. The impact of aging on access to technology. Universal Access in the Information Society, 5, 341-349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-006-0060-x

ČSÚ, (2010). [Czech Statistical Office]. Kapitola 8: Senioři a moderní informační a komunikační technologie [Chapter 8: Old people and modern information and communication technologies]. Retrieved from: http://www.czso.cz/csu/2010edicniplan.nsf/t/1100338FC9/$File/1417-10k08.pdf

Edmunds, J., & Turner, B.S. (2002). Generations, culture and society. Philadelphia: Open University.

Eyerman, R., & Turner, B.S. (1998). Outline of a theory of generations. European Journal of Social Theory, 1, 91-106. https://doi.org/10.1177/136843198001001007

Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Haddon, L. (2000). Social exclusion and information and communication technologies: Lessons from studies of single parents and the young elderly. New Media & Society, 2, 387-406.

Hesse, B.W. (2009). Enhancing consumer involvement in health care. In J.C. Parker & W. Thorson (Eds.), Health communication in new media landscape (pp. 119-144). New York: Springer Publishing Company.

Hoikkala, T. (2004). Global youth media and new forms of socialization. Presentation at United Nations Workshop on Global Youth Culture. New York.

Kanayama, T. (2003). Ethnographic research on the experience of Japanese elderly people on-line. New Media & Society, 5, 267-288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444803005002007

Kendall, D. (2010). Sociology of our times. Belmont: Wadsworth.

Landow, G.P. (2006). Hypertext 3.0: Critical theory and new media in an era of globalization. Baltimore: John Hopkins University.

Lash, S., & and Urry, J. (1987). The end of organized capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Lewis, T. (2006). Seeking health information on the Internet: Lifestyle choice or bad attack of cyberchondria? Media,Culture & Society, 28, 521-539. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443706065027

Lyotard, J.F. (1993). O postmodernismu [On postmodernism]. Praha: FÚ AVČR.

Mannheim, K. (1952). The problem of generations. In P. Kecskemeti (Ed.), Essays on the sociology of knowledge (pp. 276-321). London, UK: Routledge & Kegan.

Manovich, L. (2001). Language of new media. Cambridge: MIT Press.

McNair, B. (2006). Cultural chaos. Journalism and power in a globalised world. London: Routledge.

Melenhorst, A.S., Rogers, W.A., & Caylor, E.C. (2001). The use of communication technologies by older adults: Exploring the benefits from user´s perspective. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomic Society 45th Annual Meeting. Santa Monica: Human Factors and Ergonomic Society.

Miller, V. (2010). New media, networking and phatic culture. In P.K. Nayar (Ed.), New media and cybercultures anthology (pp. 534-544). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Morgan, R.E. (2005). Technology greets the age wave. The Gerontologist, 45, 704-710. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/45.5.704

Nicholson, C. & Hockley, J. (2011). Death and dying at older people. In D. Oliviere, B. Monroe & S. Payne (Eds.), Death, dying and social differences (pp. 101-110). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Phillipson, Ch. (2009). Reconstructing theories of aging. The impact of globalization on critical gerontology. In D.L. Bengtson, D. Gans, N.M. Putney & M. Silverstein (Eds.), Handbook of theories of aging (pp. 615-628). New York: Springer Publishing Company.

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6.

Richardson, M., Weaver, C. K., & Zorn, T. E. Jr. (2005). ‘Getting on’: Older New Zealanders’ perceptions of computing. New Media & Society, 7, 219-245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444805050763

Rogers, E.M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.

Seckin, G. (2010). Patients as information managers: The Internet for successful self-health care & illness management. Open Longevity Science, 4, 36-42.

Silverstone, R. (1994). Television and everyday life. London: Routledge.

Sourbati, M. (2009). It could be useful, but not for me at the moment: Older people, Internet access and e-public service provision. New Media & Society, 11, 1083-1100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809340786

Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital. The rise of the net generation. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Webster, F. (2006). Theories of information society. London: Routledge.

Wyatt, D. (1993). Out of sixties: Storytelling and the Vietnam generation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Zinn, J. (Ed.). (2008). Social theories of risk and uncertainty. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

Metrics

0

Crossref logo

1680

Views

2338

HTML views