Exploring the Relationships among Internet Usage, Internet Attitudes and Loneliness of Turkish Adolescents


As the average amount of time spent on the Internet is rapidly increasing, the starting age of Internet users is steadily decreasing. Thus, parents, psychologists, educators, technology creators and lawmakers must become aware of the potential risks and rewards of this phenomenon. In the light of these perspectives, this study aims to investigate the relationships among Internet usage, Internet attitudes and loneliness of Turkish adolescents. A survey method was used for the study and the data were collected by an Internet usage questionnaire, Internet attitudes scale and UCLA loneliness scale. 1049 adolescents completed the questionnaires pertaining to their own internet usage, internet attitudes and feelings of loneliness. At the end of the study, it was revealed that Turkish adolescents’ loneliness was associated with both increased Internet usage and Internet attitudes. Adolescents who reported excessive uses of the Internet for web surfing, instant messaging, emailing and online games had a significantly higher mean score of loneliness than those who did not. In addition, male adolescents reported a higher frequency of Internet usage and more loneliness than females. Male adolescents reported a higher frequency of web surfing and online games than females. However, females reported a higher frequency of e-mailing.

loneliness; Internet attitudes; Internet usage; gender
Author biography

Yavuz Erdoğan

Author photo Yavuz Erdoğan is graduated from Atatürk Education Faculty at Marmara University in 1998. He received M.A. degree on Mathematics Education in 2000 from Marmara University and received Ph.D. on Education Management and Planning in 2005 from Marmara University. He prepared the dissertation namely “Evaluation of Web Based Higher Education According to Students’ Academic Achievements and Attitudes”. He is currently a lecturer in the Department of Computer and Instructional Technologies at Marmara University in Turkey.

Beard, K.W. (2002). Internet addiction: current status and implications for employees. Journal of Employment Counseling, 39(2), 2-11.

Blackburn, C. & Read, J. (2005). Using the Internet? The experiences of parents with disabled children. Child: Care, Health and Development, 31, 507-515.

Bonebrake, K. (2002). College students’ internet use, relationship formation, and personality correlates. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 5, 551-557.

Campbell, A.J., Cumming, C.R. & Hughes, I. (2006). Internet use by the socially fearful: Addiction or therapy? CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9, 69-81.

Cohen, S. & Willis, T. (1985). Stress, social support and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310-357.

Cooper, N.S. (2003). The identification of psychological and social correlates of Internet use in children and teenagers . Unpublished doctoral thesis, Alliant International University, California.

Cummings, J.N., Sproull, L. & Kiesler, S.B. (2002). Beyond hearing: Where real-world and online support meet. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 6, 78-88.

Deloitte-Türkiye (2008). Türkiye’de İnternet kullanıcıları medyayı nasıl tüketiyor? [How internet users consume media in Turkey?] Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu. Retrieved from http://www.deloitte.com/dtt/cda/doc/content/Turkey-tr_tmt_MediaSurveyBooklet_250608.pdf .

Engelberg, E. & Sjoberg, L. (2004). Internet use, social skills and adjustment. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7, 41-47.

Erdoğan, Y. (2005). Web tabanlı yükseköğretimin öğrencilerin akademik başarıları ve tutumları doğrultusunda değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of web based higher education according to students’ academic achievements and attitudes]. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Marmara University, İstanbul.

Green, M. & Palfrey, JS. (2002). Bright futures: Guidelines for health supervision of infants, children and adolescents. Pocket guide . Arlington, VA: National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health.

Gross, E.F., Juvonen, J. & Gable, S.L. (2002). Internet use and well-being in adolescents. The Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues, 58 (1) , 75-90.

Hamburger, Y. & Ben-Artzi, E. (2003). Loneliness and internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 71.

Hardie, E. & Tee, M.Y. (2007). Excessive internet use: the role of personality, loneliness and social support networks in internet addiction. Australian Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society, 5 (1) , 34-47.

Hillier, L. & Harrison, L. (2007). Building realities less limited than their own: Young people practising same-sex attraction on the internet. Sexualities, 10, 82-100.

Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyay, T. & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53, 1017-1031.

Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J.N., Helgeson, V. & Crawford, A.M. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 49-74.

Krackhardt, D. (1994). The strength of strong ties: The importance of Philos in organizations. In N. Nohria & R. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Lavin, M., Marvin, K., McLarney, A., Nola, V., & Scott, L. (1999). Sensation seeking and collegiate vulnerability to Internet dependence. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2, 425–430.

Moody, E.J. (2001). Internet use and its relationship to loneliness. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 4, 393-401.

Morahan-Martin, J., & Schumacher, P. (2000). Incidence and correlates of pathological Internet use among college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 13-29.

Morahan-Martin, J. & Schumacher, P. (2003). Loneliness and social uses of the internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 659-671.

Nie, N., & Erbring, 1. (2000). Internet and society: a preliminary report. Stanford: Stanford Institute for the Quantitative Study of Society.

Odell, P.M., Korgen, K.O., Schumacher, P. (2000). Internet use among female and male college students. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 3, 855–862.

Oldfield, B., & Howitt, D. (2004). Loneliness, social support and Internet use . Paper presented at the conference of Internet Research 5.0: Ubiquity?, Sussex, UK.

O’Toole, K. (2000). Study offers early look at how Internet is changing daily life . Stanford News. Retrieved from www.stanford.edu/dept/news/pr/00/000216internet.html

Perse, E.M. & Ferguson, D.A. (2000). The benefits and costs of web surfing. Communication Quarterly, 48, 343-359.

Russell, D. (1996). UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 20-40.

Sapolsky, R. (1998). Why Zebras Don't Get Ulcers. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.

Savran, C. (1993). Sıfat listesinin Türkiye koşullarına uygun dilsel eşdeğerlilik, geçerlilik, güvenirlilik ve norm Çalışması ve örnek bir uygulama[To realize the lingual equivalence, validity, reliability and norm studies of adjective check list adopted to Turkey]. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Marmara University, Istanbul.

Schumacher, P. & Morahan-Martin, J. (2001). Gender, Internet and computer attitudes and experiences. Computers in Human Behavior, 17, 95–110.

Seepersad, S.S. (1997). Analysis of the relationship between loneliness, copping strategies and the Internet . Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana.

Shaw, L.H. & Gant, L.M. (2002). In defense of the Internet: The relationship between internet communication and depression, loneliness, self-esteem and perceived social support. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 5, 157-171.

Stoll, C. (1995). Silicon Snake Oi l. New York: Anchor Books.

Tavşancıl, E. & Keser, H. (2002). İnternet kullanımına yönelik likert tutum ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi [Development of a Likert type attitude scale for internet using]. Journal of Educational Science and Applications, 1 (1), 79-100.

Turkle, S. (1996). Virtuality and its discontents: Searching for community in cyberspace. The American Prospect, 24, 50-57.

Weiser, E.B. (2001). The functions of internet use and their social and psychological consequences. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 4, 723-743.

Widyanto, L. & McMurran, M. (2004). The psychometric properties of the Internet addiction test. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7, 443-450.

Whitty, M.T. & McLaughlin, D. (2007). Online recreation: The relationship between loneliness, Internet self-efficacy and the use of the Internet for entertainment purposes. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1435–1446.

Yao-Guo, G., Lin-Yan, S. & Feng-Lin, C. (2006). A research on emotion and personality characteristics in junior high school students with internet addiction disorders. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 14, 153-155.

Young, K. (1996). Internet addiction: The emergence of a new clinical disorder. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 3, 237-244.





HTML views