Social identification and collective action participation in the internet age: A meta-analysis

Abstract

Since the digitally-mediated large-scale protests took place all over the world, the role of social identities in collective actions has become the center of academic attention. Some scholars have claimed that interpersonal or individual reasons have become more important than collective identifications in participating digitally-mediated collective actions. To answer the question that whether social identification has lost its centrality in collective actions in the Internet age, we conducted a meta-analysis of 46 studies (N = 18,242) which examined digitally-mediated collective actions across the world reported between January 2011 and January 2020. We focused on the relationship between social identification and collective action, and the possible moderator effects of group type to be identified (emergent vs. pre-existing group), participation type (actual behavior vs. intention), and WEIRDness of the sample. The analyses showed a moderate to strong relationship between social identification and participation in digitally-mediated collective actions, while group type was the only significant moderator. Accordingly, the relationship between identification with emergent groups and collective action participation was much stronger compared to the relationship between identification with pre-existing groups and collective action participation. We discussed the theoretical implications of the results emphasized the basic dynamics of collective actions.

Bibliographic citation

Akfırat, S., Uysal, M. S., Bayrak, F., Ergiyen, T., Üzümçeker, E., Yurtbakan, T., & Özkan, Ö. S. (2021). Social identification and collective action participation in the internet age: A meta-analysis. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 15(4), Article 10. doi:https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2021-4-10

Keywords

Social identification; collective action; connective action; social media; digital platforms

Full Text:

HTML

References

Show references Hide references

Adam-Troian, J., Bonetto, E., & Arciszewski, T. (2021). “We Shall Overcome”: First-person plural pronouns from search volume data predict protest mobilization across the United States. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(8), 1476–1485. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620987672

Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action control, from cognition to behavior (pp. 11–39). Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2

*Alberici, A. I., & Milesi, P. (2013). The influence of the internet on the psychosocial predictors of collective action. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 23(5), 373–388. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2131

*Alberici, A. I., & Milesi, P. (2016). Online discussion, politicized identity, and collective action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19(1), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430215581430

*Alberici, A. I., & Milesi, P. (2018). Online discussion and the moral pathway to identity politicization and collective action. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 14(1), 143–158. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v14i1.1507

Anduiza, E., Cristancho, C., & Sabucedo, J. M. (2014). Mobilization through online social networks: The political protest of the indignados in Spain. Information, Communication & Society, 17(6), 750–764. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.808360

Arnett, J. J. (2016). The neglected 95%: Why American psychology needs to become less American. American Psychologist, 63(7), 602–614. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.7.602

*Ayanian, A. H., & Tausch, N. (2016). How risk perception shapes collective action intentions in repressive contexts: A study of Egyptian activists during the 2013 post-coup uprising. British Journal of Social Psychology, 55(4), 700–721. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12164

Becker, J. C., Tausch, N., Spears, R., & Christ, O. (2011). Committed dis(s)idents: Participation in radical collective action fosters disidentification with the broader in-group but enhances political identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(8), 1104–1116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211407076

Bennett, W. L., Breunig, C., & Givens, T. (2008). Communication and political mobilization: Digital media and the organization of anti-Iraq war demonstrations in the U.S. Political Communication, 25(3), 269–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600802197434

Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2012.670661

Bennett, W. L., Segerberg, A., & Walker, S. (2014). Organization in the crowd: Peer production in large-scale networked protests. Information, Communication & Society, 17(2), 232–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2013.870379

*Besta, T., Jurek, P., Iwanowska, M., & Szostakowski, D. (2019). Multiple group membership and collective actions of opinion-based internet groups: The case of protests against abortion law restriction in Poland. Computers in Human Behavior, 95, 94–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.01.025

*Bilali, R., Godfrey, E. B., & Freel, S. H. (2020). How an election loss leads to a social movement: Reactions to the 2016 U.S. presidential election among liberals predict later collective action and social movement identification. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59(1), 227–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12335

Bimber, B., Flanagin, A. J., & Stohl, C. (2005). Reconceptualizing collective action in the contemporary media environment. Communication Theory, 15(4), 365–388. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2005.tb00340.x

Bliuc, A.-M., McGarty, C., Reynolds, K., & Muntele, D. (2007). Opinion‐based group membership as a predictor of commitment to political action. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.334

Carlisle, J. E., & Patton, R. C. (2013). Is social media changing how we understand political engagement? An analysis of Facebook and the 2008 presidential election. Political Research Quarterly, 66(4), 883–895. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912913482758

Castells, M. (2015). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the Internet age. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.7312/blau17412-091

Chan, M. (2014). Social identity gratifications of social network sites and their impact on collective action participation. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 17(3), 229–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12068

*Chan, M. (2016). Psychological antecedents and motivational models of collective action: Examining the role of perceived effectiveness in political protest participation. Social Movement Studies, 15(3), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2015.1096192

*Chan, M. (2017). Media use and the social identity model of collective action: Examining the roles of online alternative news and social media news. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94(3), 663–681. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699016638837

*Chan, W., Cattaneo, L. B., Mak, W. W. S., & Lin, W.-Y. (2017). From moment to movement: Empowerment and resilience as a framework for collective action in Hong Kong. American Journal of Community Psychology, 59(1–2), 120–132. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12130

Chayinska, M., Minescu, A., & McGarty, C. (2019). ‘We fight for a better future for our country’: Understanding the Ukrainian Euromaidan movement as the emergence of a social competition strategy. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(1), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12283

*Cheng, G. H.-L., Chan, D. K.-S., & Yeung, D. Y. (2019). Correlates of acceptance of wealth inequality: A moderated mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 900. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00900

Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104

Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155

Cooper, H., Hedges, L. V., & Valentine, J. C. (Eds.) (2009). The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. Russell Sage Foundation.

*Dalgar, I., Sumer, N., Thomsen, L., & IJzerman, H. (2021). Testing the relational motivational model of collective action [Unpublished manuscript].

*de Zúñiga, H. G., Jung, N., & Valenzuela, S. (2012). Social media use for news and ındividuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 319–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01574.x

*de Zúñiga, H. G., Molyneux, L., & Zheng, P. (2014). Social media, political expression, and political participation: Panel analysis of lagged and concurrent relationships. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 612–634. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12103

Drury, J., & Reicher, S. (1999). The intergroup dynamics of collective empowerment: Substantiating the social identity model of crowd behavior. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 2(4), 381–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430299024005

Drury, J., & Reicher, S. (2000). Collective action and psychological change: The emergence of new social identities. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39(4), 579–604. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466600164642

Drury, J., & Reicher, S. (2009). Collective psychological empowerment as a model of social change: Researching crowds and power. Journal of Social Issues, 65(4), 707–725. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01622.x

Earl, J., & Kimport, K. (2011). Digitally enabled social change: Activism in the internet age. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262015103.001.0001

Ellemers, N. (1993). The influence of socio-structural variables on identity management strategies. European Review of Social Psychology, 4(1), 27–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779343000013

Garrett, R. K. (2006). Protest in an information society: A review of the literature on social movements and new ICTs. Information, Communication & Society, 9(2), 202–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180600630773

*Girerd, L., Ray, F. A., Priolo, D., Codou, O., & Bonnot, V. (2020). “Free” not to engage: Neoliberal ideology and collective action. The case of the Yellow Vest movement. International Review of Social Psychology, 33(1), Article 7. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.363

*Gotlieb, M. R., & Thorson, K. (2017). Connected political consumers: Transforming personalized politics among youth into broader repertoires of action. Journal of Youth Studies, 20(8), 1044–1061. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2017.1305101

Greijdanus, H., de Matos Fernandes, C. A., Turner-Zwinkels, F., Honari, A., Roos, C. A., Rosenbusch, H., & Postmes, T. (2020). The psychology of online activism and social movements: Relations between online and offline collective action. Current Opinion in Psychology, 35, 49–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.03.003

Harlow, S., & Guo, L. (2014). Will the revolution be tweeted or Facebooked? Using digital communication tools in immigrant activism. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3), 463–478. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12062

Haslam, S. A., Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., McGarty, C., & Reynolds, K. J. (1998). The group as a basis for emergent stereotype consensus. European Review of Social Psychology, 8(1), 203–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779643000128

Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., McElreath, R., Alvard, M., Barr, A., Ensminger, J., Smith Henrich, N., Hill, K., Gil-White, F., Gurven, M., Marlove, F. W., Patton, J. Q., & Tracer, D. (2005). “Economic man” in cross-cultural perspective: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(6), 795–815. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X05000142

Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010a). The weirdest people in the world?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X

Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010b). Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, 466(7302), 29–29. https://doi.org/10.1038/466029a

Henrich, J., McElreath, R., Barr, A., Ensminger, J., Barrett, C., Bolyanatz, A., Cardenas, J. C., Gurven, M., Gwako, E., Henrich, N., Lesorogol, C., Marlowe, F., Tracer, D., & Ziker, J. (2006). Costly punishment across human societies. Science, 312(5781), 1767–1770. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1127333

Higgins, J. P. T., & Thompson, S. G. (2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21(11), 1539–1558. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1186

Hogg, M. A., & van Knippenberg, D. (2003). Social identity and leadership processes in groups. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 35, pp. 1–52). Academic Press.

*Hsiao, Y., & Yang, Y. (2018). Commitment in the cloud? Social media participation in the sunflower movement. Information, Communication & Society, 21(7), 996–1013. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2018.1450434

*Ji, Y., Zhou, Y., & Kim, S. (2017). A moderated mediation model of political collective action in Hong Kong: Examining the roles of social media consumption and social identity. Asian Journal of Communication, 27(5), 497–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2017.1336777

Jetten, J., Mols, F., & Selvanathan, H. P. (2020). How economic inequality fuels the rise and persistence of the Yellow Vest Movement. International Review of Social Psychology, 33(1), 2. http://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.356

Jost, J. T., Liviatan, I., van der Toorn, J., Ledgerwood, A., Mandisodza, A., & Nosek, B. A. (2012). System justification: A motivational process with implications for social conflict. In E. Kals & J. Maes (Eds.), Justice and conflicts (pp. 315–327). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19035-3_19

Jost, J. T., Barberá, P., Bonneau, R., Langer, M., Metzger, M., Nagler, J., Sterling, J., & Tucker, J. A. (2018). How social media facilitates political protest: Information, motivation, and social networks. Political Psychology, 39(S1), 85–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12478

Kelly, G., & Breinlinger, S. (1995). Attitudes, intentions, and behavior: A study of women’s participation in collective action. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25(16), 1430–1445. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1995.tb02625.x

*Kende, A., van Zomeren, M., Ujhelyi, A., & Lantos, N. (2016). The social affirmation use of social media as a motivator of collective action. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 46(8), 453–469. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12375

Khazraee, E., & Novak, A. N. (2018). Digitally mediated protest: Social media affordances for collective identity construction. Social Media + Society, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118765740

Klandermans, B. (1984). Mobilization and participation: Social-psychological expansions of resource mobilization theory. American Sociological Review, 49(5), 583–600. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095417

Klandermans, B. (1997). The social psychology of protest. Blackwell Publishers.

Klein, O., Spears, R., & Reicher, S. (2007). Social identity performance: Extending the strategic side of SIDE. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(1), 28–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868306294588

Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Jr., Alper, S., Aveyard, M., Axt, J., Babaloia, M., Bahník, Š., Berkics, M., Bernstein, M. J., Berry, D. R., Bialobrzeska, O., Bocian, K., Brandt, M., Busching, R., Cai, H., Cambier, F., . . . Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating variation in replicability across sample and setting. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9654g

Lee, F. L. F., Chen, H.-T., & Chan, M. (2017). Social media use and university students’ participation in a large-scale protest campaign: The case of Hong Kong’s Umbrella Movement. Telematics and Informatics, 34(2), 457–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.08.005

Leong, C., Pan, S. L., Bahri, S., & Fauzi, A. (2019). Social media empowerment in social movements: Power activation and power accrual in digital activism. European Journal of Information Systems, 28(2), 173–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085x.2018.1512944

*Lu, C., Wan, C., Hui, P. P., & Tong, Y. (2020). In response to cultural threat: Cultural self-awareness on collective movement participation. Journal Of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 51(1), 70–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022119888795

*Mahfud, Y., & Adam-Troian, J. (2021). “Macron demission!”: Loss of significance generates violent extremism for the Yellow Vests through feelings of anomia. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(1), 108–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430219880954

McGarty, C., Bliuc, A.-M., Thomas, E. F., & Bongiorno, R. (2009). Collective action as the material expression of opinion‐based group membership. Journal of Social Issues, 65(4), 839–857. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01627.x

McGarty, C., Thomas, E. F., Lala, G., Smith, L. G. E., & Bliuc, A.-M. (2014). New technologies, new identities, and the growth of mass opposition in the Arab Spring. Political Psychology, 35(6), 725–740. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12060

*Morgan, G. S., & Chan, W. Y. (2016). Different paths to protest: Predictors of collective action in the Occupy Movement. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 46(10), 565–582. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12386

Morling, B., & Lamoreaux, M. (2008). Measuring culture outside the head: A meta-analysis of individualism-collectivism in cultural products. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(3), 199–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868308318260

Mummendey, A., Kessler, T., Klink, A., & Mielke, R. (1999). Strategies to cope with negative social identity: Predictions by social identity theory and relative deprivation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(2), 229–245. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.2.229

Nekmat, E., Gower, K. K., Zhou, S., & Metzger, M. (2019). Connective-collective action on social media: Moderated mediation of cognitive elaboration and perceived source credibility on personalness of source. Communication Research, 46(1), 62–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215609676

*Nekmat, E., & Ismail, I. (2019). Issue-based micromobilization on social media: Mediated pathways linking issue involvement and self-network opinion congruity to expressive support. Computers in Human Behavior, 101, 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.07.008

Norenzayan, A., Smith, E. E., Kim, B. J., & Nisbett, R. E. (2002). Cultural preferences for formal versus intuitive reasoning. Cognitive Science, 26(5), 653–684. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2605_4

Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., & Turner J. C. (1994). Stereotyping and social reality. Blackwell Publishing.

*Odağ, Ö., Uluğ, Ö. M., & Solak, N. (2016). “Everyday I’m Çapuling”: Identity and collective action through social network sites in the Gezi Park Protests in Turkey. Journal of Media Psychology, 28(3), 148–159. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000202

*Park, N., & Yang, A. (2012). Online environmental community members’ intention to participate in environmental activities: An application of the theory of planned behavior in the Chinese context. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(4), 1298–1306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.02.013

Platow, M. J., & van Knippenberg, D. (2001). A social identity analysis of leadership endorsement: The effects of leader ingroup prototypicality and distributive intergroup fairness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(11), 1508–1519. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672012711011

Postmes, T., & Brunsting, S. (2002). Collective action in the age of the internet: Mass communication and online mobilization. Social Science Computer Review, 20(3), 290–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/089443930202000306

Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Lea, M. (2002). Intergroup differentiation in computer-mediated communication: Effects of depersonalization. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.6.1.3

Priante, A., Ehrenhard, M. L., van den Broek, T., & Need, A. (2018). Identity and collective action via computer-mediated communication: A review and agenda for future research. New Media & Society, 20(7), 2647–2669. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817744783

Radburn, M., & Stott, C. (2019). The social psychological processes of ‘procedural justice’: Concepts, critiques and opportunities. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 19(4), 421–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895818780200

Reicher, S. (1996). ‘The Crowd’ century: Reconciling practical success with theoretical failure. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35(4), 535–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1996.tb01113.x

Reicher, S. D. (2001). The psychology of crowd dynamics. In M. Hogg & S. Tindale (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes (pp. 175–197). Blackwell Publishing.

Reicher, S., Haslam, S. A., & Hopkins, N. (2005). Social identity and the dynamics of leadership: Leaders and followers as collaborative agents in the transformation of social reality. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(4), 547–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.06.007

Rhodes, R. E., & Dickau, L. (2012). Experimental evidence for the intention–behavior relationship in the physical activity domain: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology, 31(6), 724–727. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027290

Saab, R., Spears, R., Tausch, N., & Sasse, J. (2016). Predicting aggressive collective action based on the efficacy of peaceful and aggressive actions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46(5), 529–543. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2193

*Sabucedo, J.-M., Gómez-Román, C., Alzate, M., van Stekelenburg, J., & Klandermans, B. (2017). Comparing protests and demonstrators in times of austerity: Regular and occasional protesters in universalistic and particularistic mobilisations. Social Movement Studies, 16(6), 704–720. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2017.1338940

*Schumann, S., & Klein, O. (2015). Substitute or stepping stone? Assessing the impact of low-threshold online collective actions on offline participation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(3), 308–322. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2084

Selvanathan, H. P., & Lickel, B. (2019). Empowerment and threat in response to mass protest shape public support for a social movement and social change: A panel study in the context of the Bersih movement in Malaysia. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49(2), 230–243. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2502

Shadiqi, M. A., Muluk, H., & Milla, M. N. (2018). Palestinian solidarity action: The dynamics of politicized and religious identity patterns among student activists. Makara Human Behavior Studies in Asia, 22(2), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.7454/hubs.asia.1140818

Simon, B., & Klandermans, B. (2001). Politicized collective identity: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 56(4), 319–331. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.4.319

Smith, L. G. E., Gavin, J., & Sharp, E. (2015). Social identity formation during the emergence of the Occupy movement. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(7), 818–832. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2150

Smith, L. G. E., Thomas, E., & McGarty, C. (2015). “We must be the change we want to see in the world”: Integrating norms and identities through social interaction. Political Psychology, 36(5), 543–557. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12180

Smith, L. G. E., McGarty, C., & Thomas, E. F. (2018). After Aylan Kurdi: How tweeting about death, threat, and harm predict increased expressions of solidarity with refugees over time. Psychological Science, 29(4), 623–634. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617741107

*Stewart, A. L., Leach, C. W., Bilali, R., Çelik, A. B., & Cidam, A. (2019). Explaining different orientations to the 2013 Gezi Park demonstrations in Istanbul, Turkey. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(4), 829–852. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12316

Stott, C., Ball, R., Drury, J., Neville, F., Reicher, S., Boardman, A., & Choudhury, S. (2018). The evolving normative dimensions of ‘riot’: Towards an elaborated social identity explanation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(6), 834–849. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2376

Stott, C., & Drury, J. (2000). Crowds, context, and identity: Dynamic categorization process in the “Poll Tax Riot”. Human Relations, 53(2), 247–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/a010563

Stott, C., & Reicher, S. (1998). Crowd action as intergroup process: Introducing the police perspective. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28(4), 509–529. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199807/08)28:4<509::AID-EJSP877>3.0.CO;2-C

Stürmer, S., & Simon, B. (2004). Collective action: Towards a dual-pathway model. European Review of Social Psychology, 15(1), 59–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280340000117

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.

Tang, G., & Lee, F. L. F. (2013). Facebook use and political participation: The impact of exposure to shared political information, connections with public political actors, and network structural heterogeneity. Social Science Computer Review, 31(6), 763–773. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439313490625

Thomas, E. F., Mavor, K. I., & McGarty, C. (2012). Social identities facilitate and encapsulate action-relevant constructs. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15(1), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430211413619

*Thomas, E. F., McGarty, C., Lala, G., Stuart, A., Hall, L. J., & Goddard, A. (2015). Whatever happened to Kony2012? Understanding a global Internet phenomenon as an emergent social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(3), 356–367. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2094

Thomas, E. F., McGarty, C., & Mavor, K. I. (2009). Aligning identities, emotions, and beliefs to create commitment to sustainable social and political action. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(3), 194–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309341563

*Thomas, E. F., Smith, L. G. E., McGarty, C., Reese, G., Kende, A., Bliuc, A.-M., Curtin, N., & Spears, R. (2019). When and how social movements mobilize action within and across nations to promote solidarity with refugees. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49(2), 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2380

Tufekci, Z. (2013). “Not This One”: Social movements, the attention economy, and microcelebrity networked activism. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(7), 848–870. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213479369

Turner, J. C., & Haslam, S. A. (2001). Social identity, organizations, and leadership. In M. E. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Theory and research (pp. 25–65). Lawrence Erlbaum.

Uskul, A., Kitayama, S., & Nisbett, R. (2008). Ecocultural basis of cognition: Farmers and fishermen are more holistic than herders. PNAS, 105(25), 8552-8556. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0803874105

Uysal, M. S., & Akfırat, S. (2021a). The social identity perspective of social media leadership in collective action participation. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2502

*Uysal, M. S., & Akfırat, S. A. (2021b). Formation of emergent identity: Applying the EMSICA into Gezi Park protests. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220983597

Vaast, E., Safadi, H., Lapointe, L., & Negoita, B. (2017). Social media affordances form connective action: An examination of microblogging use during the Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill. MIS Quarterly, 41(4), 1179–1205. https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2017/41.4.08

van Zomeren, M. (2013). Four core social-psychological motivations to undertake collective action. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(6), 378–388. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12031

van Zomeren, M. (2016). Building a Tower of Babel? Integrating core motivations and features of social structure into the political psychology of political action. Advances in Political Psychology, 37(S1), 87–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12322

van Zomeren, M. (2019). Toward a cultural psychology of collective action: Just how “core” are the core motivations for collective action? Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 13, Article e15. https://doi.org/10.1017/prp.2019.7

van Zomeren, M., & Louis, W. R. (2017). Culture meets collective action: Exciting synergies and some lessons to learn for the future. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20(3), 277–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217690238

van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 504–535. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504

van Zomeren, M., Spears, R., Fischer, A. H., & Leach, C. W. (2004). Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(5), 649–664. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.649

Vapnarsky, V., Ucan, E. E., Medin, D., Lynch, E., Atran, S., & Sousa, P. (2001). Folkbiology doesn’t come from folkpsychology: Evidence from Yukatek Maya in cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Cognition and Culture 1(1), 3–42. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853701300063561

*Velasquez, A., Montgomery, G., & Hall, J. A. (2019). Ethnic minorities’ social media political use: How ingroup identification, selective exposure, and collective efficacy shape social media political expression. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 24(4), 147–164. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmz007

Vestergren, S., Drury, J., & Chiriac, E. H. (2017). The biographical consequences of protest and activism: A systematic review and a new typology. Social Movement Studies, 16(2), 203–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2016.1252665

Vestergren, S., Drury, J., & Chiriac, E. H. (2018). How collective action produces psychological change and how that change endures over time: A case study of an environmental campaign. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57(4), 855–877. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12270

Vestergren, S., Drury, J., & Chiriac, E. H. (2019). How participation in collective action changes relationships, behaviours, and beliefs: An interview study of the role of inter- and intragroup processes. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 7(1), 76–99. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v7i1.903

Wahlström, M. (2011). Taking control or losing control? Activist narratives of provocation and collective violence. Social Movement Studies, 10(4), 367–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2011.614107

Waxman, S., & Medin, D. L. (2007). Experience and cultural models matter: Placing firm limits on childhood anthropocentrism. Human Development, 50(1), 23–30. http://doi.org/10.1159/000097681

Webb, T. L., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 132(2), 249–268. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.249

*Wlodarczyk, A., Basabe, N., Páez, D., & Zumeta, L. (2017). Hope and anger as mediators between collective action frames and participation in collective mobilization: The case of 15-M. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 5(1), 200–223. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v5i1.471

*Wollast, R., Lüders, A., Li, M., Wu, H., Beattie, P., Nugier, A., & Guimond, S. (2021). Understanding the role of social media in collective action: a comparison between the Yellow Vests movement in France and the Anti-ELAB protests in Hong Kong [Unpublished manuscript]. LAPSCO, UCA, France.

Wright, S. C., Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 994–1003. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.994

*Zhou, Q., & Qiu, H. (2020). Predicting online feminist engagement after MeToo: A study combining resource mobilization and integrative social identity paradigms. Chinese Journal of Communication, 13(4), 351–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2020.1725077

*= Articles included in the meta-analysis

https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2021-4-10



Copyright (c) 2021 Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.