Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace https://cyberpsychology.eu/ <p><em>Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace </em>is a diamond open access, online, peer-reviewed scholarly journal published by Masaryk University. The journal is focused on social science research about cyberspace. It brings psychosocial reflections of the impact of the Internet on people and society. The journal is interdisciplinary, publishing works written by scholars of psychology, media studies, communication science, sociology, political science, ICT security, organizational psychology and also other disciplines with relevance to psychosocial aspects of cyberspace. The journal accepts original research articles, as well as theoretical studies and research meta-analyses.</p> <p>Follow our profiles on social media:</p> <p><a href="https://mobile.twitter.com/cyberpsy_jn" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img src="https://cyberpsychology.eu/public/site/images/ldedkova/mceclip0.png" width="40" height="40" /></a> <a href="https://www.facebook.com/cyberpsychologyjournal" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img src="https://cyberpsychology.eu/public/site/images/ldedkova/mceclip3.png" width="40" height="40" /></a> <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/cyberpsychology" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img src="https://cyberpsychology.eu/public/site/images/mbedrosova/linkedin.png" alt="" width="41" height="41" /></a></p> en-US <p>By submitting a work (hereinafter referred to as the “Work”) into the <em>Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace</em> (<a href="https://cyberpsychology.eu/">https://cyberpsychology.eu/</a>) (hereinafter referred to as the “Journal”) for the consideration for publication, the author grants the Masaryk University (hereinafter referred to as “MUNI”) a license to the Work, under the following conditions:</p> <p><strong>1. Author’s Statements</strong></p> <p>1.1 The author declares that the Work is free of copyright or other legal defects, it was neither published anywhere else, nor simultaneously offered for publication, except the platforms of standard scientific pre-submission communications (e.g. SSRN, ResearchGate, Academia).</p> <p>1.2 The author declares that he/she is the real author or the joint author of the Work and his/her freedom to grant the license is not limited or excluded, and the author is entitled to dispose of the Work, because especially, but not limited to:</p> <ol> <li>the Work is not an Employee work where the employee would not be entitled to exercise the rights to the Work,</li> <li>using of the Work within the scope of the granted license is not limited by the conditions of provided grant or other financial support</li> <li>using of the Work within the scope of the granted license is not limited by the third parties’ rights (e.g. copyright, the right to the protection of personal data),</li> <li>the Work is not the work of joint authors, where the other joint authors would not agree to grant the license.</li> </ol> <p>1.3 In the case that the Work is the work of joint authors, the author declares that all the joint authors have been informed of these License Terms and that he/she is authorized to grant MUNI the license under these License Terms on behalf of the joint authors.</p> <p>1.4 The author agrees that if the Work is accepted for publication, the proposal to conclude a license agreement for the Work will be on his/her behalf aimed at an indefinite number of persons, while the content of the agreement will be determined by reference to the publicly available licence conditions <em>Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 International </em>(available from: <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/</a>); such proposal will not be done for the works or the elements (e.g. image or photographic documentation) used by the author in the Work under a contractual license with a third party.</p> <p>1.5 If any of the author’s statements prove to be untrue, the author is aware that he/she is liable for the resulting damage, including the costs associated with any litigation and damage caused by a violation of the Journal’s and/or MUNI’s reputation.</p> <p><strong>2. License Grant</strong></p> <p>2.1 The author grants MUNI gratuitous non-exclusive license to use the Work in all the known manners of use (especially, but not limited to, reproduction, distribution and communication to public), individually, in the collection or together with any other works or elements unlimited as regards to amount and form and media of expression (including electronic).</p> <p>2.2 The license is granted as territorially and quantitatively unlimited.</p> <p>2.3 The license is granted royalty-free.</p> <p>2.4 The license is granted for the duration of economic rights to the Work.</p> <p>2.5 MUNI shall be entitled to grant an authorisation forming part of the licence to the third party or parties, in whole or in part under a sublicense agreement, with or without remuneration.</p> <p>2.6 By granting the license, the author agrees with including the Work into the scientific and bibliographical databases (eg. EBSCO, CEEOL) as well as information systems for providing the informational services, where the Journal is currently indexed as well as those, where it will be indexed <em>pro futuro</em>.</p> <p>2.7 MUNI shall be not obliged to make use of the license.</p> <p><strong>3. Further Use of Work</strong></p> <p>3.1 Given granted the non-exclusive license to the Work, the author shall be entitled to further use the Work. For the purpose of such further use of the Work, the author shall be obliged to state the Journal as the source of publication of the Work.</p> <p>3.2 In the case of disclosure of the Work on the platforms of standard scientific pre-submission communications within the meaning of Art. 1.1, the author shall be obliged to additionally state the Journal as the source of publication of the Work, without undue delay.</p> <p>3.3 The reputation of MUNI and/or Journal shall not be negatively affected by the further use of the Work.</p> <p><strong>4. Varia</strong></p> <p>4.1 Legal relations based on the license shall be governed by the laws of the Czech Republic; any disputes arising out of the license shall be settled by the courts of the Czech Republic.</p> <p>4.2 If the Work is rejected for publication in the Journal, the license shall be, at the moment of the decision of rejection, restricted in such a way that it shall cover use of Work only in the necessary extent within related editorial activities (e.g. review and archiving).</p> info@cyberpsychology.eu (Cyberpsychology) marie.bedrosova@mail.muni.cz (Marie Bedrosova) Fri, 29 Nov 2024 13:54:55 +0100 OJS 3.2.1.4 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 Longitudinal relationships between ideal body short-form video exposure, self-objectification, and preference for muscularity in a partner among Chinese young women https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/37615 <p>Cultivation theory suggests that exposure to ideal body images may influence women’s self-objectification and partner preferences. According to selective exposure theory, women who self-objectify and prefer muscularity may choose media that aligns with their interests, particularly media showcasing idealized bodies. This longitudinal study examined the reciprocal relationships between ideal body short-form video exposure, self-objectification, and preference for muscularity in a partner in women. A total of 215 Chinese women (<em>M</em><sub>age </sub>= 21.1, <em>SD</em> = 2.5, range = 19–30) completed measures of ideal body short-form video exposure, self-objectification, and preference for partner muscularity at baseline and at 6-month follow-up. Cross-lagged panel analyses were used to analyze the reciprocal relationships between variables. The results revealed that viewing thin-ideal female body short-form video was associated with decreased self-objectification six months later. Viewing muscular-ideal male body short-form videos was not significantly associated with preference for muscularity after six months. However, preference for muscularity was associated with increased viewing of muscular-ideal male body short-form video six months later. Self-objectification was associated with an increased preference for muscularity in a partner six months later. The findings partially support the media selectivity theory.</p> Lijun Zheng, Tiannan Zhao Copyright © 2024 Lijun Zheng, Tiannan Zhao https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/37615 Fri, 29 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0100 Reducing transphobia with the narratives of transgender YouTubers https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/36908 <p>YouTube has emerged as a valuable resource for trans people to get themselves heard. It also has the potential to help mainstream audiences to understand more about transgender’s lives. Following Contact, Narrative Persuasion, and Queer Intercultural Theories, two experiments were conducted among cisgender people to investigate which types of narratives (positive, neutral, or negative) shared by trans YouTubers are more effective for reducing prejudice towards trans people, and whether this effect depends on the YouTuber’s gender (Study 1) and/or their ethnic background (Study 2). Results from Study 1 (<em>N</em> = 254) show that negative narratives mediate the reduction of prejudice through narrative transportation, empathy, and intergroup anxiety. Trans women’s narratives are more effective for prejudice reduction. Study 2 (<em>N</em> = 161) replicates these findings and shows that xenophobia moderates the aforesaid effect if trans YouTubers are from different nationalities. Consequently, different prejudices might interact in the reception of LGBTQ+ narratives.</p> Isabel Rodríguez-de-Dios, María T. Soto-Sanfiel Copyright © 2024 Isabel Rodríguez-de-Dios, María T. Soto-Sanfiel https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/36908 Fri, 29 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0100 Unveiling the depths of Tinder: Decoding the dark tetrad and sociosexuality in motives behind online dating https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/36677 <p>Given the widespread use of dating apps, it is essential to understand the reasons for their use. Dark Tetrad predict motives for Tinder usage in different ways, but it seems that sexual motives are one of the main reasons why “dark” people use Tinder. So, both dark traits and sociosexual orientation seem to play a relevant role. This study aimed to identify profiles of individuals in terms of their Dark Tetrad traits and their orientation towards unrestricted sex and analyse the differences between them based on the Tinder usage reasons. In 200 participants (<em>M</em><sub>age</sub> = 30.78; 67.50% female), an online survey was administered including the Tinder Motives Scale (TMS; validated in Spanish in this study), the Tinder use and outcomes, the Short Dark Triad, the Assessment of Sadistic Personality, and the Sociosexual Orientation Inventory were administered. Results offered a shorter version of the TMS, and three-profiles: Non-dark and non-sociosexual (41.30%), Slightly narcissistic and sociosexual (38.60%), and High-dark and slightly sociosexual (20.10%). There were differences between profiles and Tinder motives. People with less dark traits and sociosexual orientation seem to be more motivated to use Tinder for finding romantic partners, and people most interested in using Tinder for sexual purposes are those with moderate Dark Tetrad and not those with the highest scores. Identifying what motivates those with less sexual restriction and undesirable traits to use Tinder is crucial. This knowledge could help design awareness programs on the misuse of these apps.</p> Pilar Rico-Bordera, Manuel Galán, David Pineda, José A. Piqueras Copyright © 2024 Pilar Rico-Bordera, Manuel Galán, David Pineda, José A. Piqueras https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/36677 Fri, 29 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0100 Distinguishing high engagement from problematic symptoms in Instagram users: Associations with big five personality, psychological distress, and motives in an Italian sample https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/21420 <p class="Abstract"><span lang="EN-US">Building on recent findings by Fournier and colleagues (2023), the present study examined the fit of a bi-dimensional model of problematic Instagram use, distinguishing between non-pathological high engagement and problematic symptoms mirroring addictive tendencies. A sample of 696 Italian adults completed an online survey assessing problematic Instagram use, personality traits, psychological distress, usage motives for Instagram use, and Instagram usage metrics. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the bi-dimensional model, with high engagement (salience and tolerance) and problematic symptoms (relapse, withdrawal, conflict, and mood modification) as distinct factors. Neuroticism, depression, emotional dysregulation, loneliness, and FoMO and the diversion motive were more strongly correlated with problematic symptoms. In turn, social interaction, documentation, and self-promotion were more associated with high engagement. Frequency of sharing posts and stories were also more strongly correlated with high engagement. These findings highlight the importance of distinguishing between high engagement and addiction-like symptoms in understanding problematic Instagram use and inform the development of targeted interventions.</span></p> Davide Marengo, Alessandro Mignogna, Jon D. Elhai, Michele Settanni Copyright © 2024 Davide Marengo, Alessandro Mignogna, Jon D. Elhai, Michele Settanni https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/21420 Fri, 29 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0100 You can’t judge me! Virtual observers do not influence moral judgments in virtual environments https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/36896 <p>Prior research has shown that individuals tend to make norm-based (deontological) moral choices more frequently when observed by real humans. Our aim in this study was to explore whether this phenomenon extends to virtual observers. Sixty-two participants (39 women, 22 men and 1 non-binary) with mean age of 24.95 (<em>SD</em> = 5.70, age range 19–44) were presented with textual moral dilemmas, both in the presence of a virtual observer and alone. Prior to making the moral judgment, Skin Conductance Response (SCR) was recorded upon presentation of the moral dilemma in order to assess potential modulation of moral decisions by physiological arousal. Moral judgments were modulated by both the physiological arousal immediately preceding the decision and the directness of the dilemma (a personal dilemma involves direct harm; an impersonal one does not). Higher arousal was associated with more frequent utilitarian choices in personal dilemmas, but no effect in impersonal choices. We did not observe any impact of the virtual character’s presence on the moral decisions, thus demonstrating the potential bounds within which a virtual character can shape human behavior.</p> Radosław Sterna, Joanna Pilarczyk, Jakub Szczugieł, Teresa Kulej, Michał Kuniecki Copyright © 2024 Radosław Sterna, Joanna Pilarczyk, Jakub Szczugieł, Teresa Kulej, Michał Kuniecki https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/36896 Fri, 29 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0100 Does consciousness of social face matter? Understanding sharing behavior towards online charitable crowdfunding information https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/36922 <p>Information-sharing behavior constitutes one of the key elements for the success of online charitable crowdfunding (OCC) projects, but it has received relatively limited academic attention so far. From a relational perspective, this study proposed a conceptual model to better understand the relationship between consciousness of social face, two types of impression management motivations, OCC information-sharing behavior, and perceived relational value. An online survey was conducted among 1,166 Internet users in China (47.2% were male; 70.8% fell within the age group of 18–35 years old). The finding showed that consciousness of social face was positively associated with information-sharing behavior through the positive mediation of promotion-focused impression management motivation and the negative mediation of prevention-focused impression management motivation. Furthermore, information-sharing behavior was positively associated with perceived relational value. This study sheds light on the impact of social face consciousness on prosocial information-sharing behavior through impression management motivations and offers practical implications concerning how to promote individuals’ OCC information sharing behavior on social media.</p> Wu Li, Yujie Dong, Zehang Xie, Qi Yao, Yu Tian Copyright © 2024 Wu Li, Yujie Dong, Zehang Xie, Qi Yao, Yu Tian https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/36922 Fri, 29 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0100 Keeping users experiencing a suicidal crisis safe online: Current text-based practices of professional online mental health forum moderators https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/35038 <p class="Abstract"><span lang="EN-US" style="color: #2a2a2a;">Individuals in a heightened state of suicidal desire often utilize online mental health forums for support. What we know about support comes predominately from forum-user research and their experiences and perspectives. Little research has considered the supportive role professional moderators’ play in such situations, with no research exploring how professional moderators keep forum-users safe online. The aim of this study was to explore the in-situ text-based practices that professional moderators employ when they are keeping forum-users safe online. Using Conversation Analysis, 34 publicly available forum posts and corresponding emails between forum-users in a heightened state of suicidal desire (at-risk users), non-suicidal forum-users, and professional moderators were analyzed. Results indicate that professional moderators and forum-users</span><span lang="EN-US"> work alongside each other to <span style="color: #2a2a2a;">keep at-risk users safe online. They do this by moderators aligning to risk presentations with forum-users affiliating to at-risk users relational needs. Previous research found professional moderators wanted to use more of their counselling skills in such situations. However, based on the findings of this study moderators do not need to do more. Their current practices appear to keep forum-users safe at that moment when they are most at risk. These practices perhaps go unrecognized as skillful as they draw upon the intersubjectivity of safety rather than on</span> individual user risk<span style="color: #2a2a2a;">. Future research needs to examine the safety interactions that occur between forum-users and moderators to enable a better understanding of online spaces as suicide prevention places</span>.</span></p> Amanda Perry, Steven Christensen, Andrea Lamont-Mills, Carol du Plessis Copyright © 2024 Amanda Perry, Steven Christensen, Andrea Lamont-Mills, Carol du Plessis https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/35038 Fri, 29 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0100 Are online users influenced by what other users say? Meta-analyzing the cognitive, emotional, and behavioral impact of online comment valence https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/33915 <p>Online comments have become an essential component of online media consumption. A meta-analysis was conducted to understand how online comment valence affects message perception, issue-relevant beliefs and attitudes, issue-relevant behaviors and behavioral intentions, communication behaviors and intentions, and emotions. Comment valence is defined as the distinction between positive comments, which align with, support, or favor the opinions expressed in the original message, and negative comments, which oppose, criticize, or disagree with the opinions expressed in the original message. After a comprehensive search and systematic screening and coding of existing studies, we identified 44 studies that are eligible to be included in the meta-analysis. We found that positive (vs. negative) comments led to significantly more positive evaluations of original messages (<em>r</em> = .22), stronger beliefs and attitudes that align with the positive comments (<em>r</em> = .29), higher likelihood to engage in behaviors that align with the positive comments (<em>r</em> = .09), higher likelihood to express opinions that align with the positive comments (<em>r</em> = .26), and more positive emotions (<em>r</em> = .16). Moreover, the number of comments, whether comment valence was mixed or not, and whether the original message was news or non-news moderated the effects of online comment valence on several outcomes. The findings suggest integrating these outcomes and moderators to develop a media effect theory and guide media practices in light of comment valence effects.</p> Junhan Chen, Shilin Xia Copyright © 2024 Junhan Chen, Shilin Xia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/33915 Fri, 29 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0100 From restrictions to awareness: Examining the varied relationship between mediation strategies and parental awareness of adolescents online sexual experiences across age groups https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/37055 <p>This study examines the relationship of parental concerns and attitudes toward restriction strategies with the implementation of parental mediation strategies and parental awareness of their children’s involvement in sexting. The research involved 710 German adolescents aged between 12 and 17 years old, along with one parent from each family (569 mothers and 141 fathers). Data for this research was collected in 2019 as part of the EU Kids Online project. Multigroup structural equation modelling was used to analyse relationships between parental concerns, positive attitudes toward restrictions, mediation strategies and parental awareness across two age groups (12–14 and 15–17 years old). Results indicate that parents have equal concerns for younger and older children, but have more concerns for girls than boys. Regarding younger children, parental concerns are positively related to monitoring strategies while negatively associated with the use of restrictive strategies. Concerns about online activities have been found to predict the use of monitoring and active strategies for older children. Parental positive attitudes towards restrictions are also a predictor of the use of different strategies, with a positive relationship with restrictive, active and monitoring strategies in both age groups. Restrictive mediation is positively correlated with parental awareness about a child’s online sexual experiences in the younger group, while active mediation is positively correlated with parental awareness about a child’s online sexual experiences in the older group. In both age groups, monitoring strategies are negatively correlated with parental awareness about a child’s online sexual experiences. These findings contribute valuable insights into age-appropriate strategies when it comes to addressing sexting experiences.</p> Luka Stanić Copyright © 2024 Luka Stanić https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/37055 Fri, 29 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0100 Electronic performance monitoring: The role of reactance, trust, and privacy concerns in predicting job satisfaction in the post-pandemic workplace https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/35298 <p>Recent technological advancements combined with the accelerated trend toward remote work since the pandemic have contributed to a significant rise in electronic performance monitoring (EPM) in the workplace. Currently, nearly 80% of U.S. employers engage in some form of EPM to manage their employees. Using a theoretical foundation of Psychological Reactance Theory and the Stakeholders’ Privacy Calculus Model, this study examines employees’ perceptions of the risks and benefits associated with two common electronic monitoring practices (keyboard and video camera monitoring), and demonstrates how these factors influence employees’ privacy concerns, trust in their employer, and job satisfaction. Results from an online survey of 633 participants indicate that while employees appreciate the benefits of working remotely (and understand that EPM is a necessary component of it), they were also well aware of the risks associated with monitoring, including privacy invasion. Privacy concerns stemming from EPM were associated with a sizable reactance effect among respondents, which was, in turn, negatively correlated with both their attitude toward monitoring and their job satisfaction. That said, employer trust was strongly correlated with employees’ positive attitude toward monitoring, which exceeded the level of negative response associated with their reactance. Taken in tandem, these findings suggest that employees are weighing the perceived risks and benefits of monitoring as suggested by the Stakeholders’ Privacy Calculus Model in determining their reactance to EPM, their attitudes toward monitoring, and their job satisfaction.</p> Nancy Brinson, Bahareh Amini, Laura Lemon, Claudia Bawole Copyright © 2024 Nancy Brinson, Bahareh Amini, Laura Lemon, Claudia Bawole https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/35298 Fri, 29 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0100