Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace https://cyberpsychology.eu/ <p><em>Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace </em>is a diamond open access, online, peer-reviewed scholarly journal published by Masaryk University. The journal publishes original, high-quality social science research articles, including theoretical articles, systematic literature reviews, and meta-analyses, that advance understanding of how digital technologies, platforms, and digital media practices shape human experience, behavior, and society.</p> <p>Follow our profiles on social media:</p> <p><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/cyberpsy.bsky.social" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img src="https://cyberpsychology.eu/public/site/images/mbedrosova/bluesky-black-small.png" alt="" width="40" height="40" /></a> <a href="https://www.facebook.com/cyberpsychologyjournal" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img src="https://cyberpsychology.eu/public/site/images/ldedkova/mceclip3.png" width="40" height="40" /></a> <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/cyberpsychology" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img src="https://cyberpsychology.eu/public/site/images/mbedrosova/linkedin.png" alt="" width="41" height="41" /></a></p> en-US <p>By submitting a work (hereinafter referred to as the “Work”) into the <em>Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace</em> (<a href="https://cyberpsychology.eu/">https://cyberpsychology.eu/</a>) (hereinafter referred to as the “Journal”) for the consideration for publication, the author grants the Masaryk University (hereinafter referred to as “MUNI”) a license to the Work, under the following conditions:</p> <p><strong>1. Author’s Statements</strong></p> <p>1.1 The author declares that the Work is free of copyright or other legal defects, it was neither published anywhere else, nor simultaneously offered for publication, except the platforms of standard scientific pre-submission communications (e.g. SSRN, ResearchGate, Academia).</p> <p>1.2 The author declares that he/she is the real author or the joint author of the Work and his/her freedom to grant the license is not limited or excluded, and the author is entitled to dispose of the Work, because especially, but not limited to:</p> <ol> <li>the Work is not an Employee work where the employee would not be entitled to exercise the rights to the Work,</li> <li>using of the Work within the scope of the granted license is not limited by the conditions of provided grant or other financial support</li> <li>using of the Work within the scope of the granted license is not limited by the third parties’ rights (e.g. copyright, the right to the protection of personal data),</li> <li>the Work is not the work of joint authors, where the other joint authors would not agree to grant the license.</li> </ol> <p>1.3 In the case that the Work is the work of joint authors, the author declares that all the joint authors have been informed of these License Terms and that he/she is authorized to grant MUNI the license under these License Terms on behalf of the joint authors.</p> <p>1.4 The author agrees that if the Work is accepted for publication, the proposal to conclude a license agreement for the Work will be on his/her behalf aimed at an indefinite number of persons, while the content of the agreement will be determined by reference to the publicly available licence conditions <em>Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 International </em>(available from: <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/</a>); such proposal will not be done for the works or the elements (e.g. image or photographic documentation) used by the author in the Work under a contractual license with a third party.</p> <p>1.5 If any of the author’s statements prove to be untrue, the author is aware that he/she is liable for the resulting damage, including the costs associated with any litigation and damage caused by a violation of the Journal’s and/or MUNI’s reputation.</p> <p><strong>2. License Grant</strong></p> <p>2.1 The author grants MUNI gratuitous non-exclusive license to use the Work in all the known manners of use (especially, but not limited to, reproduction, distribution and communication to public), individually, in the collection or together with any other works or elements unlimited as regards to amount and form and media of expression (including electronic).</p> <p>2.2 The license is granted as territorially and quantitatively unlimited.</p> <p>2.3 The license is granted royalty-free.</p> <p>2.4 The license is granted for the duration of economic rights to the Work.</p> <p>2.5 MUNI shall be entitled to grant an authorisation forming part of the licence to the third party or parties, in whole or in part under a sublicense agreement, with or without remuneration.</p> <p>2.6 By granting the license, the author agrees with including the Work into the scientific and bibliographical databases (eg. EBSCO, CEEOL) as well as information systems for providing the informational services, where the Journal is currently indexed as well as those, where it will be indexed <em>pro futuro</em>.</p> <p>2.7 MUNI shall be not obliged to make use of the license.</p> <p><strong>3. Further Use of Work</strong></p> <p>3.1 Given granted the non-exclusive license to the Work, the author shall be entitled to further use the Work. For the purpose of such further use of the Work, the author shall be obliged to state the Journal as the source of publication of the Work.</p> <p>3.2 In the case of disclosure of the Work on the platforms of standard scientific pre-submission communications within the meaning of Art. 1.1, the author shall be obliged to additionally state the Journal as the source of publication of the Work, without undue delay.</p> <p>3.3 The reputation of MUNI and/or Journal shall not be negatively affected by the further use of the Work.</p> <p><strong>4. Varia</strong></p> <p>4.1 Legal relations based on the license shall be governed by the laws of the Czech Republic; any disputes arising out of the license shall be settled by the courts of the Czech Republic.</p> <p>4.2 If the Work is rejected for publication in the Journal, the license shall be, at the moment of the decision of rejection, restricted in such a way that it shall cover use of Work only in the necessary extent within related editorial activities (e.g. review and archiving).</p> info@cyberpsychology.eu (Cyberpsychology) marie.bedrosova@fss.muni.cz (Marie Jaron Bedrosova) Fri, 04 Sep 2026 13:59:38 +0200 OJS 3.2.1.4 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 AI-based writing assistants for emotional tone: Investigating users’ acceptance and recipients’ perceptions in online negotiations https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/41122 <div> <p class="Abstract"><span lang="EN-US">With the use of AI, modern writing-assistants can offer users recommendations on more subjective, socially relevant communication style aspects like emotional tone. While these recommendations commonly aim to affect interpersonal interaction outcomes, user acceptance determines the recommendations’ actual impact on the resulting messages and potential downstream effects on message recipients. The present research aimed to investigate this interplay of an AI-based writing-assistant’s recommendations for emotional tone, users’ acceptance, and recipients’ perceptions of the messages and the sender. Two online experiments used the context of online negotiations (<em>N<sub>total</sub></em> = 1,532, native English speakers residing in the UK) to investigate if users’ acceptance of a writing assistant for emotional tone was affected by whether its recommendations a) utilized AI-based functionalities and b) promoted a positive or negative emotional tone. Users tended to show greater acceptance of AI-based than non-AI recommendations, independent of whether a positive or negative emotional tone was recommended. A third study (<em>N</em> = 408) then investigated recipients’ perceptions of the produced messages. Recipients’ ratings of revised and original messages differed significantly regarding the messages’ emotional tone, their interpersonal impression of the messages’ sender, and their willingness to make concessions. Results thus suggest that the examined recommendations can elicit revisions to the emotional tone of interpersonal messages in the recommended direction and that these changes consequently affect the messages’ social effects. Hence, the present research illustrates the relevance of AI-based functionalities in writing-assistants for users’ acceptance and potential effects on interpersonal interaction outcomes once messages are sent.</span></p> </div> Josephine Hagedorn, Roman Klinger, Kai Sassenberg Copyright © 2026 Josephine Hagedorn, Roman Klinger, Kai Sassenberg https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/41122 Fri, 04 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0200 Immerse & befriend: The role of synthetic relationship perception and narrative transportation in a mental health app https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/40615 <p>The global mental health crisis has driven the rise of apps using conversational agents (CAs) to complement or replace human professional support. Offline, the success of such interventions often depends on the relationship between the help-seeker and the support provider. Online, psychological processes elicited by specific app features relating to the CA and its unique story design might play a significant role. However, research on these processes and their consequences on user engagement and well-being is scarce. To shed light on this, we conducted a cross-sectional study with 348 active users of the mental health app Betwixt. The app integrates a scripted CA as a mentor, guiding users through levels of self-development within a dream-like fantasy narrative. We tested how perceived synthetic relationships with the CA (based on the Relational Models Theory, Fiske, 1992) and narrative transportation (i.e., the extent to which users become absorbed in the story) relate to app engagement and perceived stress. Our findings indicate that a strong sense of narrative transportation and perceiving the CA as friend-like positively predict hedonic benefits and future usage intentions. However, these factors were not significantly associated with perceived stress. Our results contribute to the emerging field of synthetic relationships and highlight the potential of narrative transportation for developers of apps using similar designs. We also discuss the ethical concerns of fostering friend-like relationships with CAs and their practical implications for developers and mental health professionals.</p> Marisa Tschopp, Stefanie H. Klein, Christine Anderl, Henrik Sætra , Sonja Utz Copyright © 2026 Marisa Tschopp, Stefanie H. Klein, Christine Anderl, Henrik Sætra , Sonja Utz https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/40615 Fri, 04 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0200 Perceptions of AI-generated profile pictures: Effects on quality, attractiveness, and trustworthiness https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/39165 <p>This study investigates perceptions of AI-generated profile pictures and how disclosure of AI use shapes impressions. In a preregistered experiment, U.S. adults (<em>N</em> = 817; ages 18–99, <em>M</em> = 47.83, <em>SD</em> = 18.79; 48% men and 50% women) evaluated what they were told were social media profile pictures. The 2 × 2 factorial design varied whether images, all with a professional headshot style, were AI-generated and whether they were disclosed as AI-generated. Across three outcomes, AI-generated images were rated as higher quality than professional photos of the same subjects, but disclosure that an image was AI-generated reduced perceived quality. On average, AI generation and disclosure did not significantly affect perceptions of the person's social attractiveness or trustworthiness. Exploratory analyses indicated that self-assessed AI knowledge moderated responses to disclosure: lower-knowledge respondents downgraded labeled images and the depicted person, whereas higher-knowledge respondents evaluated labeled images and the person more positively. Taken together, the findings suggest that disclosure of AI use primarily affects evaluations of the image as an object rather than person-level impressions.</p> Jacob Long, Jingyi Xiao, Shamira McCray, Ertan Ağaoğlu, Abdullah Alajmi, Chinwendu Akalonu, Yanzhen Xu Copyright © 2026 Jacob Long, Jingyi Xiao, Shamira McCray, Ertan Ağaoğlu, Abdullah Alajmi, Chinwendu Akalonu, Yanzhen Xu https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/39165 Fri, 04 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0200 Media-multitasking and attentional control: A theory-driven research agenda https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/41567 <p class="Abstract"><span lang="EN-US">Mobile digital technologies provide ample incentives and opportunities for media-multitasking, and media consumption has become almost synonymous with media-multitasking as a result. Concerns have been raised about the potential sustained impact of media-multitasking on attentional control, and ample empirical studies have been devoted to this topic. However, recent reviews and meta-analyses demonstrate that cross-sectional outcomes on the relationship between media-multitasking and attentional control remain inconsistent and inconclusive. This obstructs theoretical advancement regarding sustained impact and, consequently, hinders clear insight into the question about whether, when, and for whom remedial interventions should be considered. In the current paper, we argue that extant research has suffered from a collective failure to consider relevant intra-individual variation in attentional control. We investigate the theoretical and methodological implications of this neglect for the study of sustained media-multitasking effects on attentional control, outlining the tenets of a theory-driven research agenda to guide a new generation of cross-sectional studies. These will be much needed in providing the evidence base to justify and inform more resource-intensive causal research in this field.</span></p> Elger Abrahamse, Douglas Parry, Daniel le Roux, Susanne Baumgartner Copyright © 2026 Elger Abrahamse, Douglas Parry, Daniel le Roux, Susanne Baumgartner https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/41567 Fri, 04 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0200 Disentangling the paradox of the privacy paradox on social media: The role of privacy dimensions, perceived benefits, privacy self-efficacy, and privacy cynicism https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/41371 <p class="Abstract"><span lang="EN-US">This study extends research on the ‘privacy paradox’ to the horizontal (privacy vis-à-vis peers) and vertical (privacy vis-à-vis institutions) dimensions of privacy on social media, and tests perceived benefits, privacy self-efficacy, and privacy cynicism as moderating factors for the privacy paradox on both dimensions. A cross-sectional online survey with a sample of U.S. adult social media users (<em>N</em> = 1,398) revealed no evidence for the privacy paradox on either the horizontal or the vertical privacy dimension (i.e., privacy concerns were positively associated with privacy management behaviors). Interestingly, perceived benefits and privacy cynicism moderated the relationships between privacy concerns and privacy management behaviors, though in the opposite direction to our prediction. In particular, the positive relationship between privacy concerns and privacy management behaviors was stronger among those with higher perceived benefits on the vertical dimension, and among those with higher privacy cynicism on both the horizontal and vertical dimensions. On the other hand, privacy self-efficacy was not a significant moderator on either dimension. Results demonstrate the multidimensional nature of online privacy and highlight the impact of conceptual and operational decisions on “finding” the privacy paradox.</span></p> Laurent Wang, Tobias Dienlin, Miriam Metzger Copyright © 2026 Laurent Wang, Tobias Dienlin, Miriam Metzger https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/41371 Fri, 04 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0200 Balancing the scales of privacy: Perceptions of privacy issues and digital risk among domestic internet of things users https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/40774 <p>While the proliferation of smart home technologies and the domestic Internet of Things (IoT) bring opportunities for a high level of control over household appliances and entertainment systems, it also presents challenges, not least in terms of privacy. In this study, we explore domestic IoT users’ perceptions of privacy issues and digital risk through in-depth semistructured interviews and digital home visits with 12 adults in 10 households in Norway. Based on the results of this study, we present a framework for an updated understanding of current privacy protection behaviors and decision-making from the perspective of domestic IoT users. Our “Scales of Privacy" model provides a holistic view of the process underlying the privacy calculus framework, incorporating both perceived risks and perceived benefits of data disclosure and including neutralizing factors, such as privacy cynicism and “nothing to hide” arguments. The results show a variety of perceived sources of risk, including national entities, technology companies, hackers, and partners/family. However, we highlight a discrepancy between the understanding of risk and perceived risk of our informants, on the one hand, and their actual behavior, on the other. We examine users’ stated reasons for utilizing an IoT-connected technology despite the risk, identifying five underlying motivations. Two were intrinsically related to the frictionless user experience provided by the devices (i.e., convenience and ease of use), whereas the remaining three (i.e., inevitability, unimpeachability and indiscernibility) revealed attitudes toward privacy protection partially influenced by a sense of being overwhelmed by the friction-filled experience of setting boundaries around personal data in the current digital environment.</p> Cristina Paupini, Dominique Kost, Terje Gjøsæter Copyright © 2026 Cristina Paupini, Dominique Kost, Terje Gjøsæter https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/40774 Fri, 04 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0200 Safer sexting: Who cares and how? https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/36706 <p>Sexting denotes technology-mediated sexual interactions from text messages to video calls. Involving sensitive data, safer sexting necessitates privacy management. Yet, digital privacy protection in intimate relationships remains understudied. We developed a four-factorial model of privacy strategies, the Sexting Privacy Management Inventory (SPMI). The SPMI distinguishes four kinds of privacy strategies along two dimensions: behaviors individuals employ alone or in interaction with their sexting partner (personal vs. interpersonal), and behaviors before or after sexting (preventive vs. reactive). As predictors of sexting privacy protection, we tested privacy concerns, romantic rejection sensitivity, sexting frequency, and sexting frequency in interaction with loneliness. Results of an online survey in a <strong>quota-based</strong> sample of 557 sexters (49.9% male) between 16 and 40 years (<em>M</em> = 28.97, <em>SD</em> = 6.67) confirmed the four-factor structure of the SPMI and showed differential effects for the four strategies. Privacy concerns against the sexting partner (social privacy concerns) predicted all privacy strategies, while concerns about how apps handle data (institutional privacy concerns) were unrelated to privacy protection. Individuals with higher romantic rejection sensitivity did not report less privacy management. More frequent sexting was related to more employment of privacy protection behaviors if individuals asynchronously sent storable files (e.g., pictures or videos). Effects of sexting frequency on privacy strategies were independent of loneliness. Thus, safer sexting was reported by those who were concerned about their sexting partner(s) and by frequent sexters (asynchronous). Overall, our four-dimensional model could be applied to other domains of privacy management.</p> Marina F. Thomas, Alice Binder, Jörg Matthes Copyright © 2026 Marina F. Thomas, Alice Binder, Jörg Matthes https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/36706 Fri, 04 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0200 No evidence of protection: Imaginary bulletproof glass fails to reduce psychological harm in content moderation https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/43077 <p>Content moderators exposed to graphic content online are at risk of negative mental health outcomes including depression, anxiety and distressing intrusive thoughts—a hallmark symptom of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Yet, there is little research on strategies to protect people exposed to graphic content. Here, we empirically tested a strategy suggested on a range of online sources for handling traumatic imagery–visualizing bulletproof glass exists between oneself and the screen. Using a content moderator simulation paradigm with Amazon Mechanical Turk participants (<em>N</em> = 202), we experimentally tested whether this intervention reduces outcomes associated with exposure to graphic imagery. We found no empirical support for this intervention influencing intrusive thought frequency, negative intrusion characteristics like intensity, anxiety, positive affect, or negative affect. We conclude that this bulletproof glass strategy should not be recommended to groups exposed to graphic content, like content moderators.</p> Chloe McDonough, Sarah Lewitzka, Victoria Bridgland, Ella Moeck, Reginald Nixon, Carolyn Semmler, Melanie Takarangi Copyright © 2026 Chloe McDonough, Sarah Lewitzka, Victoria Bridgland, Ella Moeck, Reginald Nixon, Carolyn Semmler, Melanie Takarangi https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/43077 Fri, 04 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0200 When fast becomes too fast: Working memory constraints in accelerated video playback https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/42432 <div> <p class="Abstract"><span lang="EN-US">This study investigated whether accelerated video playback affects cognitive load and comprehension, focusing on the moderating role of working memory capacity. With speed control widely available on digital platforms, it is crucial to understand how individuals cognitively process video content presented at varying speeds. To examine this, eye movements were recorded while 38 participants (16 males, 22 females; age range = 19–26 years, </span><em><span lang="EN-US">M</span></em><span lang="EN-US"> = 22.5, </span><em><span lang="EN-US">SD</span></em><span lang="EN-US"> = 1.9) watched information-oriented videos at varying speeds, followed immediately by a recall test. Results indicated that as playback speed increased, perceptual load increased for all participants. However, cognitive load and comprehension patterns differed by working memory capacity. Individuals with lower working memory capacity showed shallow processing, as indicated by the absence of elevated cognitive load, and exhibited significantly reduced accuracy in recall tasks. This suggests that they were unable to sufficiently process and retain key information due to the limitations in their cognitive resources. In contrast, individuals with higher capacity showed increased cognitive load under high-speed conditions yet maintained stable recall performance. This implies that their greater capacity to process information enabled deep processing and successful transfer to long-term memory. These findings highlight the importance of considering individual cognitive differences when evaluating the effectiveness of speed-watching strategies. Working memory capacity critically determines how well viewers can cope with the rapid presentation of multimodal content. Ultimately, our findings suggest that speed adjustment may not be an efficient strategy for all users, highlighting the need for cognitively responsive designs that foster user-centered ICT environments.</span></p> </div> Hyenyeong Chung, Yunju Nam, Upyong Hong Copyright © 2026 Hyenyeong Chung, Yunju Nam, Upyong Hong https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/42432 Fri, 04 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0200 Online connectedness: The meaning of online social interactions for young adults with mild intellectual disabilities https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/42283 <p>Young adults with mild intellectual disabilities are increasingly engaging in online social interactions. While online participation offers these young adults opportunities for connection, research on their perspectives remains scarce. Therefore, this study explores their experiences and interpretations of online social interactions. Six Dutch young adults aged 19–31 years old with mild intellectual disabilities participated in semi-structured interviews, which were analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis. Four experiential themes were identified: 1) online connections feel important, yet offline connectedness remains essential, 2) balancing between the wish and reality of fitting in online, 3) online safety as an ongoing learning process, and 4) feeling and dealing with the dark sides of online interactions. The current study concludes that online interactions can enrich, but do not replace, offline social relationships. Nevertheless, positive online interactions are not self-evident; our findings underscore the importance of strong and supportive offline networks for fostering safer, more meaningful online contact and enhancing resilience to negative experiences.</p> Hannah van Alem, Dr. Noud Frielink, Dr. Wieneke Penninga, Prof. Dr. Petri Embregts Copyright © 2026 Hannah van Alem, Dr. Noud Frielink, Dr. Wieneke Penninga, Prof. Dr. Petri Embregts https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/42283 Fri, 04 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0200 Bridging the digital divide: How smartphones are associated with physical, psychological, and social well-being in marginalized groups https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/39895 <p>This paper examines the digital divide by investigating how smartphone use and digital exclusion are associated with the physical, psychological, and social well-being of marginalized populations—including migrants, people experiencing homelessness, and prisoners—across five correlational studies (total <em>N</em> = 817). The findings reveal both benefits (e.g., fostering integration and connection) and drawbacks (e.g., exacerbating psychological challenges) of smartphone use. Study 1 explored smartphone usage among migrants (<em>N</em> = 278), showing that information-seeking apps (e.g., location services) were positively associated with psychological need satisfaction, physical health, and adaptation, whereas communication apps were not significantly associated with any of the outcome variables. Studies 2a (<em>N</em> = 75) and 2b (<em>N</em> = 174) focused on migrants during their migration journeys. In Study 2a, smartphone use for communication was positively associated with adaptation. In contrast, using smartphones for emotional regulation was linked to poorer psychological well-being in both studies. Study 3 investigated smartphone use among people experiencing homelessness (N = 71), revealing that communication was positively associated with psychological health, whereas use for emotional regulation was tied to lower psychological well-being. Finally, Study 4 examined prisoners (<em>N</em> = 219), linking limited technological skills to poorer physical and psychological well-being, while lack of access alone was not significantly associated with these outcomes. Overall, the results point to meaningful links between smartphone use and experiences of integration and connection among marginalized groups, as well as to poorer psychological well-being associated with using smartphones for emotion regulation and to the adverse effects of digital exclusion.</p> Ilenia Gasparini, Marco Marinucci, Luca Pancani, Paolo Riva Copyright © 2026 Ilenia Gasparini, Marco Marinucci, Luca Pancani, Paolo Riva https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/39895 Fri, 04 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0200 Comparative role of self-factors: A gender-based network analysis of problematic social media use and physical health https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/42230 <div> <p class="Abstract"><span lang="EN-GB">The growing prevalence of problematic social media use (PSMU) and its negative association with health has become a significant public health concern. Despite increasing attention to its psychological correlates, there remains a critical need to investigate factors that might be associated with the co-occurrence of physical health and PSMU on a fine-grained level. This study aims to examine the symptom-level relationships between PSMU, physical health, self-esteem, and self-compassion and investigate potential gender differences in these relationships. A sample of 2912 Czech adults (Age: <em>M</em> = 27.6, <em>SD</em> = 12.3, Females: 61.02%) was used to examine the relationships. A stratified network analysis based on undirected mixed graphical models and network comparison tests were conducted to inspect the gender differences. Distinct gender-specific patterns were found. In women, the use of social media to escape negative emotions emerged as a bridge symptom linking PSMU with physical health. In men, fewer and weaker connections were observed between specific PSMU and physical health symptoms. Self-esteem bridged a new cluster of physical health symptoms through escape-use in both genders. Self-compassion bridged escape-use with physical health symptoms in women, whereas no direct associations were observed in men. However, the inclusion of self-compassion in the men’s network was associated with changes in existing connections, making all links between PSMU and physical health absent. These findings highlight the gender-specific nature of PSMU and underscore the need for nuanced approaches when fostering potentially protective factors that may be relevant to physical health.</span></p> </div> Jakub Helvich, Lukas Novak, Bibiana Jozefiakova, Eva Milkova, Peter Tavel Copyright © 2026 Jakub Helvich, Lukas Novak, Bibiana Jozefiakova, Eva Milkova, Peter Tavel https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/42230 Fri, 04 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0200 Associations between prior parental mediation and digital wellbeing among young adults: Incorporating both variable- and person-centered approaches https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/41492 <p>Amid pervasive digital connectivity, maintaining digital wellbeing is increasingly important for young people. Yet empirical research on the relationship between parental mediation and digital wellbeing remains limited. Incorporating both variable- and person-centered approaches, this study explores the associations between prior parental mediation, digital disconnection and digital wellbeing among young adults. Data were drawn from 994 Chinese first-year college students (aged between 15 to 22), a developmental stage marked by increasing autonomy over digital life. Variable-centered analyses indicated that only prior active mediation was significantly associated with digital wellbeing, with rule-based disconnection mediating this association. Latent profile analysis showed that most parents practiced different mediation strategies in a balanced way. Five distinct youth-perceived mediation patterns were identified: moderate-involved (37.12%), low-involved (31.79%), high-involved (16.00%), supportive (10.97%), and restriction-oriented (4.12%). Subsequent analysis showed that the high-involved and supportive mediation pattern was most favorable for digital wellbeing, while the low-involved</p> Wei Ren, Suchuan Ma, Kaili Wang Copyright © 2026 Wei Ren, Suchuan Ma, Kaili Wang https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/41492 Fri, 04 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0200 Should I speak or should I go? Relationship closeness and descriptive norms on reactions to hate memes in private chat groups https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/42065 <div> <p class="Abstract"><span lang="EN-US">Visually and humorously packaged hate messages spread quickly on social media and thus may be shared in private chat groups, where they may trigger conflicts. In such situations, individuals must decide whether to speak up, remain passive, and/or leave the group. This study investigates how relational dynamics influence individual responses in such potentially contentious situations. Specifically, we examined the effects of relationship closeness and conformity to descriptive norms on the intention to comment and the intention to leave a group following the posting of a racist meme. A total of 1,090 German-speaking participants (60% female, 40% male, 1% diverse) with a mean age of 49.8 (<em>SD</em> = 13.84, range = 24–87) took part in an online experiment. Participants were randomly assigned to one of six conditions in a 2×3 factorial design, manipulating relationship closeness (low, high) and group response to a racist meme (no reaction, full reaction, mixed reaction). Higher relationship closeness to the group significantly increased the intention to comment on the meme, whereas participants in the high-closeness condition reported a significantly lower intention to leave the group. Contrary to expectations, group response had no significant effect on the intention to comment, challenging assumptions about conformity pressures in online groups. The results suggest that relationship closeness is more influential than mere descriptive norms in private group settings, contributing to a refined understanding of social impact and conformity processes in digital environments.</span></p> </div> Christina Josupeit Copyright © 2026 Christina Josupeit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/42065 Mon, 07 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0200 Adolescents’ social media use and conspiracy beliefs: The moderating role of rational and experiential thinking https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/40992 <p>A growing number of teenagers use social media, where they are frequently exposed to misinformation, including conspiracy theories. This cross-sectional study examines the relationships between social media use (with a focus on overall frequency and information-seeking use), tendency toward rational and experiential thinking, and conspiracy beliefs among adolescents from Romania and Poland. We hypothesized that while social media tends to spread conspiracy theories, such information is most likely to translate into beliefs among those with lower levels of rational thinking. The total sample comprised 561 participants (<em>M<sub>age</sub></em> = 17.27, <em>SD<sub>age</sub></em> = 0.79). The results indicated that social media use for information-seeking—but not the frequency of social media use—positively predicts conspiracy beliefs among adolescents. However, tendencies toward both rational and experiential thinking moderated these relationships: the positive associations between social media use and conspiracy beliefs were significant only among adolescents with low or medium levels of rational thinking (for both frequency of use and information-seeking use), as well as among those with low or medium levels of experiential thinking (for information-seeking use only). We also found moderating effects for other purposes of social media use, specifically self-presentation and entertainment. In general, our study shows that the tendency toward rational thinking moderates the relationship between more purposes of social media use and conspiracy beliefs, suggesting that rational-analytical processing provides broader protection across different online activities.</p> Magdalena Iwanowska, Rosana Stan, Anna Maria Zawadzka Copyright © 2026 Magdalena Iwanowska, Rosana Stan, Anna Maria Zawadzka https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/40992 Fri, 04 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0200