Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace https://cyberpsychology.eu/ <p><em>Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace </em>is a diamond open access, online, peer-reviewed scholarly journal published by Masaryk University. The journal is focused on social science research about cyberspace. It brings psychosocial reflections of the impact of the Internet on people and society. The journal is interdisciplinary, publishing works written by scholars of psychology, media studies, communication science, sociology, political science, ICT security, organizational psychology and also other disciplines with relevance to psychosocial aspects of cyberspace. The journal accepts original research articles, as well as theoretical studies and research meta-analyses.</p> <p>Follow our profiles on social media:</p> <p><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/cyberpsy.bsky.social" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img src="https://cyberpsychology.eu/public/site/images/mbedrosova/bluesky-black-small.png" alt="" width="40" height="40" /></a> <a href="https://www.facebook.com/cyberpsychologyjournal" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img src="https://cyberpsychology.eu/public/site/images/ldedkova/mceclip3.png" width="40" height="40" /></a> <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/cyberpsychology" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img src="https://cyberpsychology.eu/public/site/images/mbedrosova/linkedin.png" alt="" width="41" height="41" /></a></p> en-US <p>By submitting a work (hereinafter referred to as the “Work”) into the <em>Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace</em> (<a href="https://cyberpsychology.eu/">https://cyberpsychology.eu/</a>) (hereinafter referred to as the “Journal”) for the consideration for publication, the author grants the Masaryk University (hereinafter referred to as “MUNI”) a license to the Work, under the following conditions:</p> <p><strong>1. Author’s Statements</strong></p> <p>1.1 The author declares that the Work is free of copyright or other legal defects, it was neither published anywhere else, nor simultaneously offered for publication, except the platforms of standard scientific pre-submission communications (e.g. SSRN, ResearchGate, Academia).</p> <p>1.2 The author declares that he/she is the real author or the joint author of the Work and his/her freedom to grant the license is not limited or excluded, and the author is entitled to dispose of the Work, because especially, but not limited to:</p> <ol> <li>the Work is not an Employee work where the employee would not be entitled to exercise the rights to the Work,</li> <li>using of the Work within the scope of the granted license is not limited by the conditions of provided grant or other financial support</li> <li>using of the Work within the scope of the granted license is not limited by the third parties’ rights (e.g. copyright, the right to the protection of personal data),</li> <li>the Work is not the work of joint authors, where the other joint authors would not agree to grant the license.</li> </ol> <p>1.3 In the case that the Work is the work of joint authors, the author declares that all the joint authors have been informed of these License Terms and that he/she is authorized to grant MUNI the license under these License Terms on behalf of the joint authors.</p> <p>1.4 The author agrees that if the Work is accepted for publication, the proposal to conclude a license agreement for the Work will be on his/her behalf aimed at an indefinite number of persons, while the content of the agreement will be determined by reference to the publicly available licence conditions <em>Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 International </em>(available from: <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/</a>); such proposal will not be done for the works or the elements (e.g. image or photographic documentation) used by the author in the Work under a contractual license with a third party.</p> <p>1.5 If any of the author’s statements prove to be untrue, the author is aware that he/she is liable for the resulting damage, including the costs associated with any litigation and damage caused by a violation of the Journal’s and/or MUNI’s reputation.</p> <p><strong>2. License Grant</strong></p> <p>2.1 The author grants MUNI gratuitous non-exclusive license to use the Work in all the known manners of use (especially, but not limited to, reproduction, distribution and communication to public), individually, in the collection or together with any other works or elements unlimited as regards to amount and form and media of expression (including electronic).</p> <p>2.2 The license is granted as territorially and quantitatively unlimited.</p> <p>2.3 The license is granted royalty-free.</p> <p>2.4 The license is granted for the duration of economic rights to the Work.</p> <p>2.5 MUNI shall be entitled to grant an authorisation forming part of the licence to the third party or parties, in whole or in part under a sublicense agreement, with or without remuneration.</p> <p>2.6 By granting the license, the author agrees with including the Work into the scientific and bibliographical databases (eg. EBSCO, CEEOL) as well as information systems for providing the informational services, where the Journal is currently indexed as well as those, where it will be indexed <em>pro futuro</em>.</p> <p>2.7 MUNI shall be not obliged to make use of the license.</p> <p><strong>3. Further Use of Work</strong></p> <p>3.1 Given granted the non-exclusive license to the Work, the author shall be entitled to further use the Work. For the purpose of such further use of the Work, the author shall be obliged to state the Journal as the source of publication of the Work.</p> <p>3.2 In the case of disclosure of the Work on the platforms of standard scientific pre-submission communications within the meaning of Art. 1.1, the author shall be obliged to additionally state the Journal as the source of publication of the Work, without undue delay.</p> <p>3.3 The reputation of MUNI and/or Journal shall not be negatively affected by the further use of the Work.</p> <p><strong>4. Varia</strong></p> <p>4.1 Legal relations based on the license shall be governed by the laws of the Czech Republic; any disputes arising out of the license shall be settled by the courts of the Czech Republic.</p> <p>4.2 If the Work is rejected for publication in the Journal, the license shall be, at the moment of the decision of rejection, restricted in such a way that it shall cover use of Work only in the necessary extent within related editorial activities (e.g. review and archiving).</p> info@cyberpsychology.eu (Cyberpsychology) marie.bedrosova@mail.muni.cz (Marie Bedrosova) Thu, 30 Jan 2025 12:39:24 +0100 OJS 3.2.1.4 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 Prevalence and impact of Internet Gaming Disorder: A population-based study https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/38092 <p>Internet Gaming Disorder (IGD) has emerged as a significant public health concern, yet not enough is known about its prevalence among the general population as well as its relationship to well-being, mental health, specifically depression and anxiety, and gaming genres. This study aimed to address these questions. The research was conducted on a representative sample of the Croatian general population including 4,994 participants, aged between 15 and 64 years (<em>M</em> = 40.75, <em>SD</em> = 15.49). The Ten-Item Internet Gaming Disorder Test, Mental Health Inventory-5, Personal Well-being Index, Gaming time and Game Genres Preferences were used. The prevalence of the IGD in the general population of Croatia, aged 15-64 years, was estimated at 0.48%, 95% CI [0.30%, 1%], and among video game players (<em>N</em> = 1,239) at 1.63%, 95% CI [1.11%, 3%]. The highest prevalence was observed among young males. IGD showed the strongest relationship with depression, and weaker relationships with anxiety and well-being. Among the individual criteria, negative consequences for significant relationships, deception and escape had the strongest, while tolerance, loss of control and withdrawal had the weakest relationship to depression, anxiety and well-being, in a relative sense. Sports games and casual games players had lower risk for IGD, while other genres did not differ in their risk for IGD. Online and offline games did not differ in their risk for IGD. This study has shown that IGD has a relatively low prevalence among the general population and video game players, and that not all IGD criteria are equally relevant. Future longitudinal studies and studies on clinical samples are needed.</p> Josip Razum, Renata Glavak-Tkalić Copyright © 2025 Josip Razum, Renata Glavak-Tkalić https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/38092 Thu, 30 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0100 Supportive parenting and adolescents digital citizenship behaviors: The mediating role of self-regulation https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/33751 <p>A plethora of studies have shown that parenting practices can lead to problematic Internet use. However, few studies have explored how parents foster positive online behavior in adolescents. This study addresses this gap by using self-determination theory to examine how supportive parenting practices, such as autonomy support and structure provision, can influence digital citizenship behaviors in adolescents. The study considered the mediating role of adolescents’ self-regulation, and examined how sex and adolescence stage moderate these relationships. The study included 570 Mexican adolescents (48% girls and 52% boys), and structural equation modeling and multigroup invariance statistics were conducted for analysis. The results showed that autonomy support was positively associated with all dimensions of digital citizenship, while structure provision was only positively associated with online civic engagement. Self-regulation was found to mediate the relationship between autonomy support, structure provision, and digital citizenship behaviors. The multigroup analysis confirmed that sex and adolescence stage did not affect the relationship between parenting practices and digital citizenship behaviors. Overall, the results suggest that supportive parenting practices can encourage positive digital citizenship behaviors among adolescents.</p> Agustín Morales-Álvarez, Angel Alberto Valdés-Cuervo, Lizeth Guadalupe Parra-Pérez Copyright © 2025 Agustín Morales-Álvarez, Angel Alberto Valdés-Cuervo, Lizeth Guadalupe Parra-Pérez https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/33751 Thu, 30 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0100 Online experience sharing without explicit social interaction does not foster social bonding https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/38751 <p>Humans have a unique capacity to bond with others through shared experiences, even in the absence of explicit communication. Yet it is unknown whether this capacity is flexible enough to accommodate the different kinds of virtual environments on which we increasingly rely. In the current pre-registered study, we examined whether this capacity still operates effectively on shared screens during non-communicative video mediated interactions, in dyads and in groups. Participants (<em>N</em> = 144 US participants, 71 female, 72 male, 1 non-binary) either watched a video on a shared screen together with (pre-recorded) partners or watched individually while these partners attended to something else. Equivalence tests showed that self-reported social bonding scores were practically equivalent between conditions. Thus, in contrast to several in-person studies, there was no difference in social bonding between conditions. These results show that, in the absence of explicit communication, some of humans’ most fundamental social bonding mechanisms might not operate as effectively in video mediated social interactions. As such, without sufficient active social or emotional engagement, the social costs of increasingly relying on video mediated social interactions might be greater than previously thought.</p> Wouter Wolf, Kayley Dotson Copyright © 2025 Wouter Wolf, Kayley Dotson https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/38751 Thu, 30 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0100 Tackling hate speech online: The effect of counter-speech on subsequent bystander behavioral intentions https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/38275 <p>Counter-speech is considered a promising tool to address hate speech online, notably, by promoting bystander reactions that could attenuate the prevalence or further dissemination of hate. However, it remains unclear which types of counter-speech are most effective in attaining these goals and which might backfire. Advancing the literature, we examined the effect of four types of counter-speech (i.e., educating the perpetrator, calling on others to intervene, diverting the conversation, and abusing the perpetrator) on a range of bystander behavioral intentions in an experimental study (<em>N</em> = 250, UK-based adults). Overall, counter-speech did not affect bystanders’ subsequent responses to hate speech. Having said this, as expected, diversionary counter-speech increased intentions to ignore hate speech, which suggests unintended consequences. The study illustrates that counter-speech may not be sufficiently impactful in regulating bystanders’ reactions to hate speech online.</p> Yue Jia, Sandy Schumann Copyright © 2025 Yue Jia, Sandy Schumann https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/38275 Thu, 30 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0100 The adolescent Internet Adaptability Scale: Development and psychometric properties https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/37522 <p>This study presents the development and validation of the Adolescent Internet Adaptability Scale (AIAS), designed to assess adolescents’ adaptive capacities in Internet use. The scale development encompassed multiple phases with diverse sample sizes: item pool generation through interviews (<em>n</em> = 15), scale structure analysis via Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA, <em>n</em> = 553) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA, <em>n</em> = 4,637), along with reliability (<em>n</em> = 4,637) and validity (<em>n</em> = 4,637) analyses. The reliability phase included alpha, composite reliability, and retest reliability (<em>n</em> = 132), while the validity phase covered structural, convergent, discriminant, criterion-related validity, and measurement invariance tests. The AIAS, comprising eight dimensions—Internet curiosity, Internet self-efficacy, Internet learning ability, Internet socialization ability, Internet information search ability, Internet information protection ability, Internet self-control ability, and Internet positive coping ability—demonstrates strong reliability and validity. It shows positive correlations with Internet use—parental active help, well-being, and meaning in life, and negative correlations with Internet addiction and depression, with stronger associations observed with positive indicators. These findings highlight the Internet’s potential as a platform for strength acquisition. The AIAS, with its comprehensive nature, is promising for tailoring adolescent support from a positive psychology perspective, enabling holistic assessment and targeted interventions. It also advances understanding of youth development in the digital era, proving valuable for clinical and research applications. Ongoing evaluation, cross-cultural validation, and longitudinal research are essential for realizing its full potential. This multidimensional scale significantly advances the assessment of adolescent Internet use, equipping stakeholders to effectively address adolescents’ digital behaviors for enhancing well-being.</p> Weijun Wang, Jianmei Ye, Rouchun Dong, Shihao Ma, Dawei Huang, Xin Zhao Copyright © 2025 Weijun Wang, Jianmei Ye, Rouchun Dong, Shihao Ma, Dawei Huang, Xin Zhao https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/37522 Thu, 30 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0100