Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace https://cyberpsychology.eu/ <p><em>Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace </em>is a diamond open access, online, peer-reviewed scholarly journal published by Masaryk University. The journal is focused on social science research about cyberspace. It brings psychosocial reflections of the impact of the Internet on people and society. The journal is interdisciplinary, publishing works written by scholars of psychology, media studies, communication science, sociology, political science, ICT security, organizational psychology and also other disciplines with relevance to psychosocial aspects of cyberspace. The journal accepts original research articles, as well as theoretical studies and research meta-analyses.</p> <p>Follow our profiles on social media:</p> <p><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/cyberpsy.bsky.social" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img src="https://cyberpsychology.eu/public/site/images/mbedrosova/bluesky-black-small.png" alt="" width="40" height="40" /></a> <a href="https://www.facebook.com/cyberpsychologyjournal" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img src="https://cyberpsychology.eu/public/site/images/ldedkova/mceclip3.png" width="40" height="40" /></a> <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/cyberpsychology" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img src="https://cyberpsychology.eu/public/site/images/mbedrosova/linkedin.png" alt="" width="41" height="41" /></a></p> Masaryk University, Faculty of Social Studies en-US Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace 1802-7962 <p>By submitting a work (hereinafter referred to as the “Work”) into the <em>Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace</em> (<a href="https://cyberpsychology.eu/">https://cyberpsychology.eu/</a>) (hereinafter referred to as the “Journal”) for the consideration for publication, the author grants the Masaryk University (hereinafter referred to as “MUNI”) a license to the Work, under the following conditions:</p> <p><strong>1. Author’s Statements</strong></p> <p>1.1 The author declares that the Work is free of copyright or other legal defects, it was neither published anywhere else, nor simultaneously offered for publication, except the platforms of standard scientific pre-submission communications (e.g. SSRN, ResearchGate, Academia).</p> <p>1.2 The author declares that he/she is the real author or the joint author of the Work and his/her freedom to grant the license is not limited or excluded, and the author is entitled to dispose of the Work, because especially, but not limited to:</p> <ol> <li>the Work is not an Employee work where the employee would not be entitled to exercise the rights to the Work,</li> <li>using of the Work within the scope of the granted license is not limited by the conditions of provided grant or other financial support</li> <li>using of the Work within the scope of the granted license is not limited by the third parties’ rights (e.g. copyright, the right to the protection of personal data),</li> <li>the Work is not the work of joint authors, where the other joint authors would not agree to grant the license.</li> </ol> <p>1.3 In the case that the Work is the work of joint authors, the author declares that all the joint authors have been informed of these License Terms and that he/she is authorized to grant MUNI the license under these License Terms on behalf of the joint authors.</p> <p>1.4 The author agrees that if the Work is accepted for publication, the proposal to conclude a license agreement for the Work will be on his/her behalf aimed at an indefinite number of persons, while the content of the agreement will be determined by reference to the publicly available licence conditions <em>Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 International </em>(available from: <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/</a>); such proposal will not be done for the works or the elements (e.g. image or photographic documentation) used by the author in the Work under a contractual license with a third party.</p> <p>1.5 If any of the author’s statements prove to be untrue, the author is aware that he/she is liable for the resulting damage, including the costs associated with any litigation and damage caused by a violation of the Journal’s and/or MUNI’s reputation.</p> <p><strong>2. License Grant</strong></p> <p>2.1 The author grants MUNI gratuitous non-exclusive license to use the Work in all the known manners of use (especially, but not limited to, reproduction, distribution and communication to public), individually, in the collection or together with any other works or elements unlimited as regards to amount and form and media of expression (including electronic).</p> <p>2.2 The license is granted as territorially and quantitatively unlimited.</p> <p>2.3 The license is granted royalty-free.</p> <p>2.4 The license is granted for the duration of economic rights to the Work.</p> <p>2.5 MUNI shall be entitled to grant an authorisation forming part of the licence to the third party or parties, in whole or in part under a sublicense agreement, with or without remuneration.</p> <p>2.6 By granting the license, the author agrees with including the Work into the scientific and bibliographical databases (eg. EBSCO, CEEOL) as well as information systems for providing the informational services, where the Journal is currently indexed as well as those, where it will be indexed <em>pro futuro</em>.</p> <p>2.7 MUNI shall be not obliged to make use of the license.</p> <p><strong>3. Further Use of Work</strong></p> <p>3.1 Given granted the non-exclusive license to the Work, the author shall be entitled to further use the Work. For the purpose of such further use of the Work, the author shall be obliged to state the Journal as the source of publication of the Work.</p> <p>3.2 In the case of disclosure of the Work on the platforms of standard scientific pre-submission communications within the meaning of Art. 1.1, the author shall be obliged to additionally state the Journal as the source of publication of the Work, without undue delay.</p> <p>3.3 The reputation of MUNI and/or Journal shall not be negatively affected by the further use of the Work.</p> <p><strong>4. Varia</strong></p> <p>4.1 Legal relations based on the license shall be governed by the laws of the Czech Republic; any disputes arising out of the license shall be settled by the courts of the Czech Republic.</p> <p>4.2 If the Work is rejected for publication in the Journal, the license shall be, at the moment of the decision of rejection, restricted in such a way that it shall cover use of Work only in the necessary extent within related editorial activities (e.g. review and archiving).</p> AI aversion? Effects of author disclosure on young people’s perceptions of mental health advice https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/40848 <p>The increasing use of large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, is already impacting how young people seek mental health support online. However, AI aversion, the reluctance or resistance individuals feel toward AI, may influence individuals’ perceptions and willingness to engage with LLM-generated advice. In this mixed-method study, we investigated how 440 young people (aged 17–21) perceived mental health advice from ChatGPT compared with that of health professionals, emphasizing the effect of author disclosure. Participants assessed answers from ChatGPT and health professionals across four dimensions—Validation, Relevance, Clarity, and Utility—and were asked to recommend answers. The findings indicate a preference for AI-generated answers when participants were unaware of the author’s identity: ChatGPT’s answers scored significantly higher on Validation, Relevance, Clarity, and Utility. Conversely, when the author was disclosed, participants favored responses from health professionals and rated their answers significantly higher for Validation, indicating AI aversion. Qualitative data further revealed that participants became more critical when they knew the content was AI-generated, while responses from health professionals were viewed as more credible, empathetic, and tailored. These findings may indicate human favoritism. The study makes the key contribution of identifying how source awareness impacts the reception of AI-generated content in a sensitive domain. To address the potential for AI aversion within help-seeking, our findings suggest the importance of developing hybrid human–AI support models that combine the efficiency of AI with the relational legitimacy of human professionals, improving both the acceptance and impact of digital mental health support.</p> Petter Bae Brandtzaeg Marita Skjuve Asbjørn Følstad Copyright © 2026 Petter Bae Brandtzaeg, Marita Skjuve, Asbjørn Følstad https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 2026-04-14 2026-04-14 20 2 10.5817/CP2026-2-1 Social media as sources of sexual health knowledge: A compensatory or complementary form of education? https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/40133 <p style="font-weight: 400;">Recent research has shown that information about sexuality is increasingly prevalent on social media. At the same time, it is well-documented that sexual health content shared or created by laypeople can be misleading or inaccurate. This study investigates who consumes sexual health knowledge on these platforms and tests whether social media technologies have a compensatory (i.e., making up for a lack of sexual education elsewhere) or complementary (i.e., enhancing sexual information individuals obtain elsewhere) function for sexual education. Results from a survey conducted in early 2023 among <em>N</em> = 1,245 adult social media users living in Germany (age: <em>M</em> = 41.94 years, <em>SD</em> = 14.47; gender identity: 50.3% identified as female, 49.3% as male, 0.4% as other) indicated that young, male, and highly educated individuals are more likely to be exposed to sexual education on social media. Among participants, 54.1% indicated that they encounter sexual misinformation at least sometimes. Findings further provide evidence for both mechanisms—educational compensation and educational enhancement: Individuals with stronger sexual communication apprehension, as well as those who tend to engage in sexuality-related talk in everyday life, expose themselves more frequently to sexual education. These findings have implications for theory building in the field of informal education processes through contemporary technologies and for the design of sexuality-related educational interventions.</p> German Neubaum Jan-Sebastian Grund Copyright © 2026 German Neubaum, Jan-Sebastian Grund https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 2026-04-14 2026-04-14 20 2 10.5817/CP2026-2-2 Selling yourself short: How sexualized online dating profiles affect viewers’ perceptions and relationship intentions https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/40025 <p class="Abstract"><span lang="EN-US">People often use sexualized images in their online dating profiles to stand out. However, this strategy can backfire, hurting their chances of finding a partner. Three studies examined the effects of sexualized profiles on how viewers see profile owners while investigating why and when sexualization can have negative effects. Across all studies, unpartnered participants assessed sexualized and non-sexualized dating profiles, providing ratings on their perceptions of profile owners and their own relationship intentions. Study 1 revealed that owners of sexualized profiles faced heightened negative judgments and were perceived as less desirable partners (although these findings should be regarded as preliminary due to the use of different profile owners across conditions). Study 2 found diminished interest in establishing long-term relationships with sexualized profile owners due to perceiving them as less suitable partners. Study 3 showed that adding humanizing self-descriptions counteracted the negative effects of sexualization for female profiles but not for male profiles. These findings suggest that whether sexualization leads to negative judgments depends on its contextual meaning.</span></p> Gurit E. Birnbaum Kobi Zholtack Harry T. Reis Copyright © 2026 Gurit Birnbaum, Kobi Zholtack, Harry T. Reis https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 2026-04-14 2026-04-14 20 2 10.5817/CP2026-2-3 Knowledge benefits through work-related social media use: A preregistered measurement burst study https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/40062 <p>The claim that work-related social media use can help people to get better access to information has received cross-sectional empirical support, but it remains unclear to what extent these benefits are really media effects or rather selection effects. We conducted a year-long five-wave panel study with two intensive measurement periods (bi-daily assessment for one workweek after Waves 3 and 4) to disentangle within- and between-person effects. Within-person effects would support the claim that there are media effects on work-related outcomes. By looking at two different timeframes (half-day vs. three months), we also aim to explore on which timescales these effects evolve. Our analyses focused on reading and posting on social media and controlled for networking (waves) and workload (bursts) as potential confounders. In line with preregistered predictions, we found that within-person increases in reading and posting differentially predicted increases in informational benefits, ambient awareness, serendipity, creativity, and productivity measured at the same time period. Reading was positively related to the outcomes in both bursts and waves. Posting, in contrast, showed positive associations with most outcomes only within the same half‑day (bursts), and with creativity alone in the waves. In contrast, we found no consistent lagged effects at half-day or three-month intervals. In addition, between-person differences also emerged, especially for posting. Individuals who posted more often reported higher creativity and serendipity. Overall, the stronger within-person effects observed in the bursts suggest that WRSMU may provide positive, but predominantly short-term, benefits.</p> Christine Anderl Franziska Gaiser Sonja Utz Copyright © 2026 Christine Anderl, Franziska Gaiser, Sonja Utz https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 2026-04-14 2026-04-14 20 2 10.5817/CP2026-2-4 The role of nonverbal communication cues in reducing videoconference fatigue: A comparison of 2D and virtual reality videoconference platforms https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/40292 <p class="Abstract"><span lang="EN-US">Videoconferencing for work and study purposes has become increasingly prevalent in people's daily lives. However, the negative effects of prolonged and frequent use of videoconferencing, particularly videoconference fatigue (VF), have also become more severe. With technological advancements, virtual reality (VR) videoconferencing has been proposed as a potential solution to mitigate these negative impacts, especially concerning nonverbal communication cues. This study investigates the varying effects of VR conferencing and traditional 2D videoconferencing on users’ nonverbal communication cues and VF. In total, 216 university students (<em>M<sub>age</sub></em> = 22.65, <em>SD</em> = 3.28; 44% male, 56% female) were randomly paired and assigned to use either VR or Zoom for a videoconferencing task. The findings revealed that students using VR reported fewer negative outcomes from nonverbal communication cues compared to those using Zoom. Among the nonverbal communication cues studied, only perceptions of feeling physically trapped significantly influenced VF, while mirror anxiety, production of nonverbal cues, and hyper-gaze were not found to be related. The results suggest that VR conferencing may offer a more effective approach to reducing VF by minimizing the negative effects of nonverbal communication cues.</span></p> Benjamin Li Heng Zhang Copyright © 2026 Benjamin Li, Heng Zhang https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 2026-04-14 2026-04-14 20 2 10.5817/CP2026-2-5 The dark triad and cyber aggression: Testing the longitudinal mediation of moral disengagement and toxic online disinhibition https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/39710 <p class="Abstract"><span lang="EN-US">An emerging body of research has consistently linked the Dark Triad traits—Machiavellianism, narcissism, and psychopathy—to cyber aggression. Moral disengagement and toxic online disinhibition have been identified as two psychological processes that may explain this association. However, longitudinal studies simultaneously examining these two mediators in the context of cyber aggression remain scarce, even though such designs are essential for clarifying temporal order and capturing dynamic processes. To address this gap, we conducted a three-wave longitudinal study in which 625 participants completed all three waves of the survey (<em>M</em><sub>age</sub> = 27.54, <em>SD</em><sub>age</sub> = 6.23, age range: 20–58; 392 females). We tested a longitudinal mediation model to examine whether moral disengagement and toxic online disinhibition mediate the relationship between the Dark Triad traits and cyber aggression. Toxic online disinhibition was found to be the only significant mediator. This mediating effect was statistically significant for Machiavellianism and psychopathy, but not for narcissism. These findings suggest that toxic online disinhibition may serve as a more robust pathway than moral disengagement in explaining how specific Dark Triad traits contribute to cyber aggression.</span></p> Cheng-Yen Wang Yih-Lan Liu Chia-Yun Chang Copyright © 2026 Cheng-Yen Wang, Yih-Lan Liu, Chia-Yun Chang https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 2026-04-14 2026-04-14 20 2 10.5817/CP2026-2-6 Phubbing and relational evaluation among college students: A longitudinal study https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/39454 <p class="Abstract"><span lang="EN-US">Phubbing, the act of ignoring others in favor of mobile phone use, has become a widespread phenomenon in social settings and poses increasing challenges to college students’ interpersonal relationships. The present study used a three-wave longitudinal design to examine the impact of peer phubbing on relational evaluation, with a particular focus on the mediating role of psychological needs threat, the moderating role of perceived social norms, and the cumulative nature of these effects over time. Data were collected from 593 Chinese college students across three waves spanning six months. The results showed that peer phubbing at earlier time points predicted higher levels of psychological needs threat and lower relational evaluation at later time points, whereas relational evaluation did not predict subsequent phubbing behavior. Psychological needs threat significantly mediated the longitudinal association between peer phubbing and relational evaluation, while perceived social norms did not moderate the effect of peer phubbing on needs threat and relational evaluation. These findings suggest that peer phubbing undermines situational interpersonal relationship experiences regardless of its perceived normative status. Moreover, peer phubbing appears to function not merely as a momentary interpersonal disruption but as a recurring form of everyday social exclusion with cumulative psychological and relational consequences.</span></p> Ronghua Zhang Xiaofeng Guo Na Yang Chenguang Du Copyright © 2026 Ronghua Zhang, Xiaofeng Guo, Na Yang, Chenguang Du https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 2026-04-14 2026-04-14 20 2 10.5817/CP2026-2-7 Problematic Mobile Media Use as a Family Issue: A Latent Profile Analysis in Parent-Child Dyads https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/41888 <p class="Abstract"><span lang="EN-US">Current research primarily addresses children’s problematic mobile media use (PMMU) and its negative outcomes, leaving a gap in our understanding of how parents’ PMMU might contribute to a problematic media culture within the home. The study aimed to (a) identify family profiles based on PMMU by the child and parent simultaneously through latent profile analysis and examine their associations with (b) sociodemographic factors and (c) key indicators of family well-being, specifically child self-esteem, parental self-efficacy and parent-child conflict. Using a sample of 410 parent-child dyads, primarily mother-daughter pairs (42.4%), with preadolescent children (8-14 years; <em>M<sub>age</sub></em> = 11.5), we identified four profiles based on cross-sectional dyadic survey data; Families with high child PMMU (46.6%), families with low child PMMU (16.1%), media-balanced families (33.2%) and media-immersed families (4.2%). Results showed notable sociodemographic variations, including a higher prevalence of only-child families in the media-immersed group, and revealed that families with high child PMMU and media-immersed family profiles were linked to lower personal and relational well-being within the family. These findings emphasize the importance of family-centered approaches to PMMU prevention and intervention.</span></p> Nele Janssens Sarah Coyne Kathleen Beullens Copyright © 2026 Nele Janssens, Sarah Coyne, Kathleen Beullens https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 2026-04-14 2026-04-14 20 2 10.5817/CP2026-2-8