Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace https://cyberpsychology.eu/ <p><em>Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace </em>is a diamond open access, online, peer-reviewed scholarly journal published by Masaryk University. The journal is focused on social science research about cyberspace. It brings psychosocial reflections of the impact of the Internet on people and society. The journal is interdisciplinary, publishing works written by scholars of psychology, media studies, communication science, sociology, political science, ICT security, organizational psychology and also other disciplines with relevance to psychosocial aspects of cyberspace. The journal accepts original research articles, as well as theoretical studies and research meta-analyses.</p> <p>Follow our profiles on social media:</p> <p><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/cyberpsy.bsky.social" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img src="https://cyberpsychology.eu/public/site/images/mbedrosova/bluesky-black-small.png" alt="" width="40" height="40" /></a> <a href="https://www.facebook.com/cyberpsychologyjournal" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img src="https://cyberpsychology.eu/public/site/images/ldedkova/mceclip3.png" width="40" height="40" /></a> <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/cyberpsychology" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img src="https://cyberpsychology.eu/public/site/images/mbedrosova/linkedin.png" alt="" width="41" height="41" /></a></p> Masaryk University, Faculty of Social Studies en-US Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace 1802-7962 <p>By submitting a work (hereinafter referred to as the “Work”) into the <em>Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace</em> (<a href="https://cyberpsychology.eu/">https://cyberpsychology.eu/</a>) (hereinafter referred to as the “Journal”) for the consideration for publication, the author grants the Masaryk University (hereinafter referred to as “MUNI”) a license to the Work, under the following conditions:</p> <p><strong>1. Author’s Statements</strong></p> <p>1.1 The author declares that the Work is free of copyright or other legal defects, it was neither published anywhere else, nor simultaneously offered for publication, except the platforms of standard scientific pre-submission communications (e.g. SSRN, ResearchGate, Academia).</p> <p>1.2 The author declares that he/she is the real author or the joint author of the Work and his/her freedom to grant the license is not limited or excluded, and the author is entitled to dispose of the Work, because especially, but not limited to:</p> <ol> <li>the Work is not an Employee work where the employee would not be entitled to exercise the rights to the Work,</li> <li>using of the Work within the scope of the granted license is not limited by the conditions of provided grant or other financial support</li> <li>using of the Work within the scope of the granted license is not limited by the third parties’ rights (e.g. copyright, the right to the protection of personal data),</li> <li>the Work is not the work of joint authors, where the other joint authors would not agree to grant the license.</li> </ol> <p>1.3 In the case that the Work is the work of joint authors, the author declares that all the joint authors have been informed of these License Terms and that he/she is authorized to grant MUNI the license under these License Terms on behalf of the joint authors.</p> <p>1.4 The author agrees that if the Work is accepted for publication, the proposal to conclude a license agreement for the Work will be on his/her behalf aimed at an indefinite number of persons, while the content of the agreement will be determined by reference to the publicly available licence conditions <em>Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 International </em>(available from: <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/</a>); such proposal will not be done for the works or the elements (e.g. image or photographic documentation) used by the author in the Work under a contractual license with a third party.</p> <p>1.5 If any of the author’s statements prove to be untrue, the author is aware that he/she is liable for the resulting damage, including the costs associated with any litigation and damage caused by a violation of the Journal’s and/or MUNI’s reputation.</p> <p><strong>2. License Grant</strong></p> <p>2.1 The author grants MUNI gratuitous non-exclusive license to use the Work in all the known manners of use (especially, but not limited to, reproduction, distribution and communication to public), individually, in the collection or together with any other works or elements unlimited as regards to amount and form and media of expression (including electronic).</p> <p>2.2 The license is granted as territorially and quantitatively unlimited.</p> <p>2.3 The license is granted royalty-free.</p> <p>2.4 The license is granted for the duration of economic rights to the Work.</p> <p>2.5 MUNI shall be entitled to grant an authorisation forming part of the licence to the third party or parties, in whole or in part under a sublicense agreement, with or without remuneration.</p> <p>2.6 By granting the license, the author agrees with including the Work into the scientific and bibliographical databases (eg. EBSCO, CEEOL) as well as information systems for providing the informational services, where the Journal is currently indexed as well as those, where it will be indexed <em>pro futuro</em>.</p> <p>2.7 MUNI shall be not obliged to make use of the license.</p> <p><strong>3. Further Use of Work</strong></p> <p>3.1 Given granted the non-exclusive license to the Work, the author shall be entitled to further use the Work. For the purpose of such further use of the Work, the author shall be obliged to state the Journal as the source of publication of the Work.</p> <p>3.2 In the case of disclosure of the Work on the platforms of standard scientific pre-submission communications within the meaning of Art. 1.1, the author shall be obliged to additionally state the Journal as the source of publication of the Work, without undue delay.</p> <p>3.3 The reputation of MUNI and/or Journal shall not be negatively affected by the further use of the Work.</p> <p><strong>4. Varia</strong></p> <p>4.1 Legal relations based on the license shall be governed by the laws of the Czech Republic; any disputes arising out of the license shall be settled by the courts of the Czech Republic.</p> <p>4.2 If the Work is rejected for publication in the Journal, the license shall be, at the moment of the decision of rejection, restricted in such a way that it shall cover use of Work only in the necessary extent within related editorial activities (e.g. review and archiving).</p> Does the mere presence of smartphones impact cognition in the high school classroom? https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/40111 <p>The regulation of smartphone use in high schools is a contentious issue. Among others, a key question is whether the location of learners’ phones affects their cognitive performance in the classroom. While some studies have found that a smartphone’s mere presence can impair cognition, others suggest that the evidence is weak, or that when separated from their phones, adolescents may experience anxiety which can also harm cognitive performance. We conducted two experimental studies at different high schools to test the effects of smartphone location on performance in a fluid intelligence task. Study 1 (<em>n</em> = 195; learner’s desk: <em>n</em> = 96; schoolbag: <em>n</em> = 99) was conducted at a boys-only high school, while Study 2 (<em>n</em> = 115; learner’s desk:<em> n</em> = 41; schoolbag: <em>n</em> = 49; teacher’s desk: <em>n</em> = 25) was conducted a girls-only high school. Both studies were conducted in normal class settings and administered by teachers to enhance ecological validity. Across both studies, we found no clear evidence that having the phone on the desk impaired performance. In some comparisons, learners performed slightly worse when phones were in schoolbags and slightly better when phones were placed on the teacher’s desk, but these effects were small and not robust. Learners did not report elevated anxiety when separated from their phones. Overall, our findings highlight the need for further research to clarify whether and how phone location influences cognitive performance in school settings, and to better understand the psychological and attentional mechanisms involved.</p> Daniel B. le Roux Douglas A. Parry Jennifer Feldman Copyright © 2025 Daniel B. le Roux, Douglas A. Parry, Jennifer Feldman https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 2025-09-18 2025-09-18 19 4 10.5817/CP2025-4-1 Investigating the cross-sectional and longitudinal relationship of X and LINE use with online relationship and life satisfaction: A 4-Year cohort study among Japanese adults https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/40155 <p class="Abstract"><span lang="EN-US">The rise of social media has sparked extensive research on its relationship with well-being, yet drawing definitive conclusions remains challenging due to the multifaceted nature and diversification of these platforms. To gain a clearer understanding of this relationship, it is essential to explore how various social media platforms both cross-sectionally and longitudinally relate to well-being as well as to explore direct and indirect relationships mediated by other factors. Such investigation is lacking especially in Non-Western context. To address this gap, the author examined the cross-sectional and longitudinal relationships of X (formerly Twitter) and LINE use with life satisfaction—a key indicator of well-being—both directly and indirectly through the quality of online relationships, within a 4-year cohort of 1,674 Japanese adults. Multivariate latent growth curve modeling revealed a mixed relationship between X use and life satisfaction. Direct relationships with life satisfaction were negative, both cross-sectionally and longitudinally. In contrast, an indirect relationship—mediated by online relationships—was positive both cross-sectionally and longitudinally. In contrast, LINE use consistently showed positive relationships with life satisfaction, with both direct and indirect positive cross-sectional associations through online relationships. These findings underscore the growing diversity of social media platforms and the need to recognize that the relationship between social media use and life satisfaction varies depending on the platform in both Western and non-Western contexts. To support well-being, public education and digital literacy efforts should address the risks of excessive use of open-network platforms like X, while avoiding overgeneralizations to closed-network platforms like LINE, which may enhance well-being through supportive relationships.</span></p> Yu Takizawa Copyright © 2025 Yu Takizawa https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 2025-09-18 2025-09-18 19 4 10.5817/CP2025-4-2 The relationship between usage of social networking sites and meaning in life: Anonymous versus identifiable contexts https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/38288 <p class="Abstract"><span lang="EN-US">Social networking sites (SNSs) allow people to choose how they want to engage with others. Some behaviours are more associated with aspects of well-being (i.e., meaning in life) than others. Online environments also afford people the opportunity to interact with other people at varying levels of anonymity and identifiability, which could further impact well-being. However, whether people use SNSs differently when they are anonymous versus identifiable – and how this relates to their meaning in life – has not been investigated. To test this, we sampled 192 participants (<em>M</em><sub>age</sub> = 19.72) to investigate differences in how people use and post on SNSs while anonymous and identifiable. Furthermore, we assessed how these behaviours were associated with meaning in life. We found that: (1) People were most likely to use SNSs passively across anonymous and identifiable environments. (2) People were most likely to post about life updates/social activities in identifiable environments, and intellectual or negative topics in anonymous environments. (3) Passive usage was negatively associated with meaning in life in identifiable environments. (4) Active-targeted usage (behaviours that are directed towards a specific person or a small group) and posting about life updates/social activities were positively associated with meaning in life, but only in identifiable environments. We demonstrate that meaning in life is related to how people use SNSs, but also the specific online environments they seek out.</span></p> Lewis Nitschinsk Stephanie J. Tobin Nino Gugushvili Carly McComb Philippe Verduyn Copyright © 2025 Lewis Nitschinsk, Stephanie J. Tobin, Nino Gugushvili, Carly A. McComb, Philippe Verduyn https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 2025-09-18 2025-09-18 19 4 10.5817/CP2025-4-3 Navigating the digital landscape: Exploring the relationship between social media affordances and Chinese Generation Z’s online prosocial and antisocial behaviors https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/39370 <p>Online prosocial and antisocial behaviors are increasingly prevalent on social media, highlighting the need to explore the factors that shape these online social behaviors. Understanding the influencing factors, including social media use, is crucial for fostering healthy online interactions and mitigating potential risks in digital environments. In this study, we examine whether and how online prosocial and antisocial behaviors are associated with social media affordances, specifically the notions of bandwidth, social presence, anonymity, and ephemerality. Based on the collected sample of Chinese Generation Z (<em>N</em> = 782), the online survey study finds that bandwidth and social presence are positively associated with online prosocial behavior through online social support. On the other hand, anonymity is negatively related to online prosocial behavior through online social support and positively related to online antisocial behavior through online disinhibition. Also, ephemerality is positively associated with online antisocial behavior through the indirect effect of online disinhibition. Interestingly, while online social support positively predicts online prosocial behavior and online disinhibition positively predicts online antisocial behavior, the relationship between online social support and online antisocial behavior is not as simple. The relation is found to be positive for females and emerging adults, negative for adolescents, and insignificant for males. Theoretical implications for social media use and online social behaviors, as well as practical implications for online prosocial and antisocial behavior interventions, are discussed.</p> Wu Li Pengya Ai Tian You Guo Lianshan Zhang Copyright © 2025 Wu Li, Pengya Ai, Tian You Guo, Lianshan Zhang https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 2025-09-18 2025-09-18 19 4 10.5817/CP2025-4-4 Breaking barriers: The impact of intergroup contact on bystanders' actions against bias-based cyberbullying https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/38053 <p class="Abstract"><span lang="EN-US">Bystanders are present in most bullying and cyberbullying incidents, and when they intervene in favor of the victim, they can effectively stop it. Evidence suggests that intergroup factors, such as social identification, increase bystanders’ helping intentions in bullying episodes. However, relatively little is known about the potential positive effects of intergroup factors on bystanders’ attitudes and behaviors when witnessing bias-based cyberbullying (i.e., cyberbullying based on identity). Two studies examined bystanders’ responses to cyberbullying toward two minority groups (i.e., LGBTQI+ and Black youth); and what can influence their helping intentions when they witness bias-based cyberbullying episodes. Study 1 (<em>N</em> = 2,253) showed that bystanders' responses vary depending on the target of cyberbullying, helping an LGBTQI+ youth target less than a Black target, and showing less empathy, less positive group norms, less inclusive identities, less positive attitudes, and more intergroup anxiety. Study 2 (<em>N</em> = 2,254) revealed that high quality offline contact is associated with more helping behaviors via increased empathy, outgroup attitudes, dual-identity representations and decreased intergroup anxiety (for the LGBTQI+ target), and via empathy, one-group identity, and group norms (for the Black target). Implications for efforts to promote more helping behaviors and positive intergroup attitudes in the online context are discussed.</span></p> Raquel António Rita Guerra Lindsey Cameron Carla Moleiro Copyright © 2025 Raquel António, Rita Guerra, Lindsey Cameron, Carla Moleiro https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 2025-09-18 2025-09-18 19 4 10.5817/CP2025-4-5 Bystanders’ perceptions on online hate speech: Investigating the effects of perpetrators’ justifications and the bystander’s role on bystanders’ attitude and prosocial intervention intentions https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/39145 <p>On social media, users are exposed to online hate speech (OHS), which is a type of speech that attacks a person or a group based on a group characteristic, e.g., gender identity or sexual orientation. Not every bystander evaluates OHS as offensive and/or feels the need to intervene, which can lead to the continuation of OHS and damaging consequences for victims. The goal of the present study was to understand attitudinal and behavioral components of bystanders’ perceptions on OHS by investigating content-related, contextual, and personal characteristics. More precisely, the effects of the presence or absence of online moral disengagement strategies or moral excuses in OHS messages (e.g., “I’m posting this because it doesn't hurt if I share my opinion online”) and the bystander’s role (pure bystander or vicarious victim) on bystanders’ attitudes and behaviors were tested, while controlling for previous experience with OHS and connectedness with the target group. To this aim, a repeated measures experiment (5x2x2 mixed design) was conducted among 633 adults aged 18–25. The results indicated no difference in bystanders’ perceived offensiveness of OHS and intention to intervene when exposed to OHS containing a moral excuse compared to OHS without. When bystanders were vicarious victims (being exposed to OHS targeting an individual with whom the bystander shares the targeted group characteristic), OHS was perceived as more offensive and bystanders had a higher intention to intervene with prosocial bystander behavior, compared to when bystanders did not share the group characteristic. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.</p> Sara Pabian Copyright © 2025 Sara Pabian https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 2025-09-18 2025-09-18 19 4 10.5817/CP2025-4-6 Unravelling social network usage patterns: A study based on unsupervised learning https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/39343 <p>We are facing a growing concern regarding the consequences of Problematic Social Network Use (PSNU). Therefore, the aim of the present study was to explore the profiles of social network (SN) users and contrast their differences across variables linked to PSNU in the literature. A sample of 726 participants aged 16 and above (77.0% female) residing in Spain was analysed using Latent Class Analysis (LCA). ANOVA and chi-square test were employed to investigate differences in sociodemographic variables, digital preferences, impulsivity, emotional intelligence, empathy and aggression among the latent classes. The three-class model, which proved the most parsimonious, identified functional, risky, and problematic users. Notably, greater differences were observed between functional and risky users regarding impulsivity and emotional regulation, whereas differences in empathy and aggression were more pronounced between problematic users and the other two groups. The study provides relevant information about the characteristics of different groups of SN users. This information may be useful for the early detection of inappropriate online behaviours that may lead to PSNU, as well as for identifying users who may have already developed it.</p> Alfredo Zarco-Alpuente Víctor Ciudad-Fernández Marta Carrique-Martínez Lucas Serrano-Pastor Elisabeth Malonda-Vidal Anna Llorca-Mestre Rafael García-Ros Paula Samper-García Copyright © 2025 Alfredo Zarco-Alpuente, Víctor Ciudad-Fernández, Marta Carrique-Martínez , Lucas Serrano-Pastor, Elisabeth Malonda-Vidal, Anna Llorca-Mestre , Rafael García-Ros, Paula Samper-García https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 2025-09-18 2025-09-18 19 4 10.5817/CP2025-4-7 Convergent and divergent predictors of extensive use time and problematic TikTok use https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/38352 <p>Short videos on TikTok provided an entertaining pastime for 1.5 billion users worldwide in 2023. The increasing popularity of TikTok has generated considerable research interest in the psychological and social predictors of problematic use. However, recent empirical studies on Internet-based activities have found evidence that extensive time spent on TikTok is not necessarily problematic. This study explores convergent and divergent predictors of extensive and problematic TikTok use including demographics, psychological distress, and TikTok activities. A total of 618 Hungarian TikTok users (80.1% women, 18.8% men; <em>M</em><sub>age</sub> = 22.1 years, <em>SD</em> = 4.2) completed an online questionnaire. The unidimensional, six-item Problematic TikTok Use Questionnaire was developed, demonstrating good psychometric properties in terms of factor structure, reliability, and validity. Based on latent profile analysis, 3.07% of TikTok users were found to be at risk of problematic TikTok use. Using a structural equation model, it was found that symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress had stronger associations with problematic use than with extensive time spent on TikTok. Exploring the Discover page and viewing content creators’ videos predicted only problematic use severity. Exploring the For You page and reading comments posted to others’ videos were the strongest predictors of both extensive use time and problematic use. These factors collectively explained a notable proportion of the variance of problematic use severity (45%). The findings provide a detailed picture of risky use patterns and extend knowledge of the differences between extensive use time and problematic TikTok use.</p> Ágnes Zsila Mara S. Aruguete Reza Shabahang Ágnes Buvár Gábor Orosz Copyright © 2025 Ágnes Zsila, Mara S. Aruguete, Reza Shabahang, Ágnes Buvár, Gábor Orosz https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 2025-09-18 2025-09-18 19 4 10.5817/CP2025-4-8 Fear of missing out mediates the relationship between intolerance of uncertainty and problematic smartphone use severity https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/38936 <p>Despite the widespread use of smartphones, not all users develop problematic use. Understanding the pathways that lead from healthy to Problematic Smartphone Use (PSU) is essential for uncovering underlying mechanisms and informing effective prevention strategies. Building on theoretical models of PSU, this study explores a maladaptive regulatory-focused pathway linking Intolerance of Uncertainty (IU) to PSU through Fear of Missing Out (FoMO) as a mediator. Although previous research has linked IU, FoMO, and PSU in pairs, few studies have examined these constructs simultaneously within a unified explanatory framework. By integrating them into a theoretically grounded mediation model, this study offers a more comprehensive understanding of psychological mechanisms that may underlie PSU. We conducted a cross-sectional online survey with 343 U.S. undergraduate students, recruited through a university research pool in exchange for course credit. Participants completed self-report measures of IU, FoMO, and PSU. Using structural equation modeling, we examined a mediation model incorporating latent variables for IU, FoMO, and PSU, assessing both direct and indirect effects of IU on PSU through FoMO. Results indicated that IU showed a positive association with FoMO, which was further associated with elevated PSU levels. The direct association between IU and PSU was non-significant. These findings support theoretical models positing that personal predispositions, such as IU, contribute to PSU through Internet-related cognitive biases like FoMO. Preventive initiatives should focus on raising awareness about the adverse effects of IU and FoMO on PSU and promoting strategies to effectively manage IU and FoMO, potentially reducing the risk of PSU.</p> Nisha Yao Caleb Hallauer Elyse Hutcheson Jon Elhai Copyright © 2025 Nisha Yao, Caleb Hallauer, Elyse Hutcheson, Jon Elhai https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 2025-09-18 2025-09-18 19 4 10.5817/CP2025-4-9 Theory of mind predicts emoji comprehension in a sample of early adolescents: The moderating effect of social media use https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/39572 <p>Despite the widespread use of social media and communication apps among early adolescents, little is known about which psychological variables affect their comprehension of emojis, i.e., pictograms delivering emotional cues in digital messages. To fill this gap, the present study explores the role of Theory of Mind (ToM) in emoji comprehension at the boundary condition of low vs high Social Media Use (SMU), in a sample of 303 Italian early adolescents (134 females) aged between 10 and 14 years old. Participants completed an SMU scale, two ToM measures, namely the Reading the Mind in the Eyes test and Real/apparent Emotions task, and an emoji comprehension task. Results showed that both ToM measures positively predicted emoji comprehension. Moreover, there was a significant interaction between the Real/apparent Emotions task and SMU, with stronger relationships between ToM and emoji comprehension for low SMU. Separate analyses with easy- and difficult-to-classify emojis as dependent variables showed the same interaction effect only on easy emojis, while we found no significant interaction effect on difficult emojis. Taken together, these results suggest that youngsters less familiar with social media rely on ToM to encode and decode emojis and interpret digital messages. Conversely, the more they use social media, the more automated this task becomes. In this sense, ToM training could be relevant to promote preparatory skills among early adolescents starting to approach digital communication.</p> Elisa Bisagno Simone Pinetti Alice Lucarini Martina Basciano Alessia Cadamuro Copyright © 2025 Elisa Bisagno, Simone Pinetti, Alice Lucarini, Martina Basciano, Alessia Cadamuro https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 2025-09-18 2025-09-18 19 4 10.5817/CP2025-4-10 Meme-ingful connections: Unleashing the power of memes, GIFs, and emojis in relationship-oriented online communication https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/38321 <p>This study examines the influence of graphic icons in building and maintaining social connections in computer-mediated communication interactions. Through an online survey, participants (<em>N</em> = 395) were randomly assigned to reflect on conversations with either a close contact (strong tie) or an acquaintance (weak tie) and reported their use of graphic icons. We found that the use of graphic icons can be viewed as part of routine relational maintenance practices. More frequent use of memes, GIFs, and emojis was associated with greater self-disclosure breadth and depth, stronger intimacy, and better relationship maintenance. Social anxiety and tie strength moderated these relationships. The effects were stronger for less socially anxious individuals and in weak tie relationships, suggesting that graphic icons may serve different social functions depending on individual characteristics and relational contexts. These findings provide evidence that memes, GIFs, and emojis can serve as useful tools to improve social connection and relationship management in digital communication.</p> Rachel X. Peng Jin Chen Copyright © 2025 Rachel X. Peng, Jin Chen https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 2025-09-18 2025-09-18 19 4 10.5817/CP2025-4-11